![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Winter despondency seems to be setting in among us northern gliding =
buffs. Still months to go! Smyk bashing as a last resort is not very = seemly .... and will not change the mind of those lucky enough to fly = low performance ships in places so good that they put to shame our feats = in wonderful ships and less than perfect climes. I have a better proposal for all this pent-up energy: a handful of = enthusiasts have been working hard towards a proper online resource = about gliding and gliders. What? Aren't we well enough alone with Alex's = or other directories? Actually, no. These are very welcome resources but = suffer from the bottleneck common to all closed projects. The knowledge = of individuals, however vast, is limited, and projects get stalled when = their authors tire or lack time. The Sailplane Directory for example = hasn't changed in years (no criticism implied of the fine effort made by = its creators). Please have a look he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gliders. = And he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glider. And = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliding. A lot has already been = accomplished. Much more remains to be done, until a full and = authoritative online reference on gliding and gliders comes into being. = For example, only the LS sailplanes are all covered with in-depth = articles at this moment. You will also motice that most work is recent, = dating from the last year or even the last few months.=20 Do you have personal experience about types not yet covered in the list? = Perhaps you have the perfect photo to illustrate a rare glider? Or you = have found a mistake overlooked by previous contributers? No need to ask = anyone's permission. Go ahead, contribute! From personal experience I say that working on these pages is quite = pleasant, with separate contributers meshing their contributions without = any problem, intuitively recognising and respecting their specific areas = and levels of expertise. I am sure it will continue to be so. After all, = we are all knowledgeable gliding savants and very considerate of each = other, aren't we? If you wish to contribute and are new to the open editing concept, spend = some time reading the online guidelines and browsing existing articles = (both about gliding and other subjects). See how they are built up on = the 'Edit' tabs. Check their evolution in the 'History' tab. Appreciate = image publishing policy by visiting the 'Upload file Toolbox'. In = particular, understand the article naming conventions and categories = before trying to change them. Start with small additions to existing = articles, then step up to bolder contributions. You are welcome.=20 As a taster, why not start by bashing the PW5 article? Meet you there, F. Almeida |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tie-down winter hazards | [email protected] | Owning | 6 | January 12th 05 10:23 PM |
Are pilots really good or just lucky??? | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 68 | December 9th 04 01:53 PM |
Cubans: Good years and bad? | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | October 23rd 04 07:53 PM |
WTB: McCreedy speed ring | Slick | Soaring | 7 | July 16th 04 03:11 AM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |