![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have this idea and have been thinking of applying for a patent. Also
thinking of how much to charge for this product even though a prototype is not yet "in the bag". The idea for this product is a result of advances in technology evolving in Helicopters for the benefit of pilots to reduce work loads and other encumbrances on their skill level in the cockpit. Many pilots now prefer to have GPS, FBW, FADEC, rotor governors and on and on. Currently I am only planning on a simulated passenger with a pilot soon to follow when the fully autonomous flight systems become available. "SANDY" (as my product will affectionately be referred to) will consist of a cellulose cylinder with a sealing flap at both ends. While I don't want to disclose the entire product plan I want to give enough info to determine any interest in the product. Basically it is to offered at first as a "kit" to keep manufacturing and product development cost low. It will consist of the cylinder mentioned previously along with 2 60 lb. bags of #30 grit kiln dried sand. The Two bags of sand can then be poured into the cellulose cylinder (up to 90 pounds worth) and then the ends sealed with glue (included). I realized this leaves a surplus of 30 lb. of sand but this could be saved to make possible repairs to "SANDY" if such emergency should arise. If additional weight is required one would be permitted to modify "SANDY" by using Duct tape available separately to attach the original sand containers to the cellulose cylinder for additional capacity. This is not recommended though as Sandy becomes quite heavy and becomes difficult to board or disembark from the helicopter placing the product at much more risk of wear and tear. Sandy of course will be known as "crew" Sandy while "Captain" Sandy will become available by the time fully autonomous flight systems become available. Sandy is semi-androgenous and will not be available with any gender identifying incidentals. Comments welcomed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
I have this idea and have been thinking of applying for a patent. Also thinking of how much to charge for this product even though a prototype is not yet "in the bag". Sandy of course will be known as "crew" Sandy while "Captain" Sandy will become available by the time fully autonomous flight systems become available. Sandy is semi-androgenous and will not be available with any gender identifying incidentals. Comments welcomed. ![]() minimum weight required in the cockpit. She had to strap 2 army sand bags on the left seat when she was doing her solo work. -- boB, SAG 70 U.S. Army Aviation (retired) Central Texas - 5NM West of Gray Army Airfield (KGRK) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helicopter Question | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 49 | December 5th 05 05:41 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
Helicopter "imcident" question | Chuck | Piloting | 10 | October 19th 04 12:33 AM |
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts | Eric D | Rotorcraft | 22 | March 5th 04 06:11 AM |