![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I've been doing some researching for a while, but haven't found any recent topics. I would like to hear some comments/experiences about Pitts S-2A and the Zlin 142. Is there any way to find decent specimens of these for under 65K? I am under the impression that the Pitts is a much more capable acro machine, but it seems the setup of the Zlin (tricycle gear) would be more conducive to using it for upset training and private/commercial training while also enabling me to do/instruct acro for a lot less insurance cost (since all my time would be tricycle-type gear time by the time I'm ready to purchase). But I may be way off on what it cost to get a decent 142 these days. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Paul CFI/CFII |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() YeahBuddy wrote: I am under the impression that the Pitts is a much more capable acro machine, but it seems the setup of the Zlin (tricycle gear) would be more conducive to using it for upset training and private/commercial training while also enabling me to do/instruct acro for a lot less insurance cost (since all my time would be tricycle-type gear time by the time I'm ready to purchase). But I may be way off on what it cost to get a decent 142 these days. Any input would be greatly appreciated. I've never had the chance to fly a Zlin 142/242, but I'd say that the statement that the Pitts is much more capable is accurate. Also the 142 has the Walter inline engine, which could be a pain to maintain. The 242 with the 200hp Lyc. is more attractive-more expensive. (Anyone around here that has tried to provide training/rental with a Zlin hasn't lasted long, although one college uses the 242 as a trainer.) If you want a tricycle gear trainer that can do basic aeros, why not just get an Aerobat? It will be a lot less expensive to purchase/operate than the Zlin and almost as capable. (As I understand it, the 142 can do basic sportman maneuvers, but not snap rolls. The Aerobat can't fly inverted, but can snap.) As for the Pitts, it's a wonderful airplane, but will require a serious checkout even if you have tailwheel time and you would probably have to operate dual only. If you want to teach students how to get back upright after an upset, the aerobat might suffice. (The Pitts rolls so easily, I'm not sure it gives a student a realistic feel for what rolling a typical airplane is like. Also, since most airplanes have yokes, maybe the students should experience a yoke for emergency upset training.) Training students for competition aeros or similar is another kettle of fish entirely. The Decathlon/Pitts/Extra is the typical way to go for that. Just my $0.00 worth, rick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |