![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From today's WSJ...
Air Force Tanker Gets Nod; Boeing, Airbus to Compete By REBECCA CHRISTIE DOW JONES NEWSWIRES April 15, 2006;*Page*A2 WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon said it will let the Air Force start a competition for its next-generation tanker plane, clearing the way for a showdown between Boeing Co. and European rival Airbus. The Defense Department said chief weapons buyer Ken Krieg signed off on the plan late Thursday. Recent studies "indicate that the department has sufficient time to structure a traditional competitive program to gain the best value for the taxpayer," Mr. Krieg said in a memo. The Air Force expects to release its information request within a few weeks. Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne received Mr. Krieg's memo and will issue instructions soon, said Air Force spokesman Doug Karas. The Air Force wants a new tanker, used to refuel aircraft in flight, based on a widely available passenger jet. Its existing tankers, related to Boeing's long-retired 707 passenger jet, are about 45 years old but will continue flying until replacements are ready. Boeing, based in Chicago, wants the Air Force to buy its 767-based tanker, which Italy and Japan already have ordered. But it will face competition from the Airbus 330, which is being converted into a tanker by European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. -- the owner of 80% of Airbus -- and Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman Corp. The coming battle should reassure lawmakers, who blocked an earlier $23 billion plan to lease and buy 100 Boeing planes. That deal mushroomed into a larger procurement scandal when it emerged that a former Air Force weapons buyer, Darleen Druyun, held illegal job talks with Boeing. Ms. Druyun admitted breaking federal conflict-of-interest laws and served a nine-month prison term. Boeing declined to comment on the latest developments. Northrop Grumman, which leads the Airbus-based team, said it has a versatile solution to offer when the Air Force is ready. "Northrop Grumman is pleased to see the process moving forward and we welcome the opportunity to respond to the upcoming request for information and subsequent request for proposal," spokesman Randy Belote said. Analysts don't expect another major contender to emerge, even though several government-backed studies said the Air Force could consider other airplanes. Boeing and Airbus each make other jets that might be suitable, and the studies also looked at prospects for used aircraft or an all-new tanker. Air Force officials have said a request for proposals could come in 2006, with a contract awarded next year. That schedule may slip a bit, said Lexington Institute defense analyst Loren Thompson, who provides consulting services to military aircraft maker Lockheed Martin Corp. and other defense companies. "Sometime early next year there's going to be a request for proposals that will result in the Air Force buying 100 Boeing or Airbus aircraft as its next-generation tanker. I don't see any other solutions that the Air Force is willing to embrace," Mr. Thompson said. Write to Rebecca Christie at FROM THE ARCHIVES * €*Pentagon Study Supports Both Boeing, Airbus 01/26/06 * €*Boeing May Enter Modified 777 in Tanker Battle 12/05/05 * |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 05 08:31 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 05 07:29 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
EADS aims at USAF tanker market | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | September 20th 03 05:54 PM |