![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi everybody:
I am representing a company that is specialized in proposing a series of customized solutions for the fight against counterfeiting and for protection of Intellectual Property, thanks to several security tecnologies that might be stand-alone or embedded in other products for friendly use. The keys for secure identification are visible and invisible security technologies which need special devices to be positively identified. While one of the first logical application of such technologies seems to be the fashion-related world, I would like to propose these products to the aerospace industry which is in these years more and more concerned by not-OEM spare parts that eventually build a parallel market the airlines are sometimes not aware to feed. If you were to propose such ideas and concepts, which key-manager or airframe maker department would you ask for an apointment? In a few words, is there any particular position in the airplane manufacturers world that i specially taking care of this? I thank you in advance for your suggestion or direct experience. Regards Andrea Milan, ITALY |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The FAA has had the procedure in place for many years.
Criminals can sell bogus parts now and any system you can invent can also be ignored by criminals who will use it to sell their bad parts, citing your certification. 109 results for bogus parts out of at least 6,015 ( Details ) These sources have been queried: a.. Federal Forms - No result retrieved in 0.138s, 50 requested. (1 page requested - 1 OK) b.. FirstGov FAQs - No result retrieved in 0.141s, 20 requested. (1 page requested - 1 OK) c.. My Money - No result retrieved in 0.133s, 200 requested. (1 page requested - 1 OK) d.. Podcasts - No result retrieved in 0.145s, 20 requested. (1 page requested - 1 OK) e.. Web Results - Top 100 results retrieved out of 6,015 in 1.026s, 100 requested. (2 pages requested - 2 OK) f.. Web Results - Top 9 results retrieved out of 9 in 0.213s, 10 requested. (1 page requested - 1 OK) v 1.7 1.. Federal Aviation Administration - faasafety.gov - Flight Safety ... [new window][preview][close preview] It is common to refer to unapproved parts as "bogus parts", and a bogus part in the minds of most people correlates to counterfeit parts. It is accurate to say that counterfeit parts are ... www.faasafety.gov/hottopics.aspx?id=21- Cached -More from this site 2.. 3.. 4.. NTSB - Advisory [new window][preview][close preview] Bogus" Parts Case in Italy. According to widely reported news media accounts, earlier this year authorities discovered a cache of replacement parts for Airbus aircraft in Italy that might have ... www.ntsb.gov/Pressrel/2002/020225.htm- Cached -More from National Transportation Safety Board 5.. "AWG" wrote in message ... | Hi everybody: | | I am representing a company that is specialized in proposing a series of | customized solutions for the fight against counterfeiting and for protection | of Intellectual Property, thanks to several security tecnologies that might | be stand-alone or embedded in other products for friendly use. The keys for | secure identification are visible and invisible security technologies which | need special devices to be positively identified. | While one of the first logical application of such technologies seems to be | the fashion-related world, I would like to propose these products to the | aerospace industry which is in these years more and more concerned by | not-OEM spare parts that eventually build a parallel market the airlines are | sometimes not aware to feed. | If you were to propose such ideas and concepts, which key-manager or | airframe maker department would you ask for an apointment? | In a few words, is there any particular position in the airplane | manufacturers world that i specially taking care of this? | I thank you in advance for your suggestion or direct experience. | | Regards | | Andrea | Milan, ITALY | | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Built and sold spare parts my whole life. Anyone can phony up a part. The deal is it just doesnt happen very often. The parts are tracable right back to the manufacture down to every sub that performed an operation. If someone sold a faulty part they would get caught. When an aerospace company buys parts all certs are required. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluckyguess wrote:
"Built and sold spare parts my whole life. Anyone can phony up a part. The deal is it just doesnt happen very often. The parts are tracable right back to the manufacture down to every sub that performed an operation. If someone sold a faulty part they would get caught. When an aerospace company buys parts all certs are required. Not true at all - you might want to check into what the ASA says about this. You might also want to check into what the FAA says about "building" spare parts. You seem to be confusing serviceability with traceability. The fact is, anyone can buy and sell anything without paperwork as long as they do not represent it at serviceable material. Industry standard does require trace to the last regulated source that owned the part, but there is no law saying it must be provided. In addition, industry standard certainly does not require trace to the manufacturer for most aircraft parts. The exceptions are life limited engine parts, which ARE generally required to be traced to the manufacturer. Maintenance documents for the life of the part are also not required, even for the above mentioned life limited parts. Disclaimer - The above refers to commercial industry standards, not FAA requirements or GA spare parts. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AWG wrote:
I would like to propose these products to the aerospace industry which is in these years more and more concerned by not-OEM spare parts that eventually build a parallel market the airlines are sometimes not aware to feed. Well, actually, the airlines ARE aware of the market in non-OEM parts. Some airlines even gasp buy PMA parts to install on their aircraft. It's not as much of an issue as you seem to think it is. There is nothing illegal or unethical about non-OEM parts in the spares marketplace. PMA does not equal counterfeiting. I wonder what you think of Pratt & Whitney's decision to manufacture CFM56 parts..... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Emily" wrote in message ... Aluckyguess wrote: "Built and sold spare parts my whole life. Anyone can phony up a part. The deal is it just doesn't happen very often. The parts are traceable right back to the manufacture down to every sub that performed an operation. If someone sold a faulty part they would get caught. When an aerospace company buys parts all certs are required. Not true at all - you might want to check into what the ASA says about this. You might also want to check into what the FAA says about "building" spare parts. You seem to be confusing serviceability with traceability. The fact is, anyone can buy and sell anything without paperwork as long as they do not represent it at serviceable material. Industry standard does require trace to the last regulated source that owned the part, but there is no law saying it must be provided. Then an AP would have to install the part or a FAA approved station. Again what AP or FAA approved work station would install this part. This is what insures the part was built to spec. Again part is traceable. In addition, industry standard certainly does not require trace to the manufacturer for most aircraft parts. Your wrong. Show me one part not traceable. The exceptions are life limited engine parts, which ARE generally required to be traced to the manufacturer. Maintenance documents for the life of the part are also not required, even for the above mentioned life limited parts. The amount of years has changed different companies require different lengths of time. Disclaimer - The above refers to commercial industry standards, not FAA requirements or GA spare parts. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluckyguess wrote:
snip Then an AP would have to install the part or a FAA approved station. Again what AP or FAA approved work station would install this part. This is what insures the part was built to spec. Again part is traceable. You're wrong. I don't know what else to say. Aircraft parts do not have to be traced to the manufacturer. In addition, industry standard certainly does not require trace to the manufacturer for most aircraft parts. Your wrong. Show me one part not traceable. I can show you at least twenty engine part that I dealt with today. Industry standard does NOT require trace to the manufacturer. Industry standard ONLY requires trace to the manufacturer for life limited engine and airframe parts. Please check with ASA, because you are dead wrong on this. I'm very curious as to what company you work for. First, you claim to manufacturer spare aircraft parts - under what authority do you do this? Second, I work with most major parts distributors and brokers and do not have any customers who require that spare parts be traced to a manufacturer. I also work with most every major airline in the world and they do not require spare parts to be traced to the manufacturer. You, sir, are full of it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Emily" wrote in message . .. Aluckyguess wrote: snip Then an AP would have to install the part or a FAA approved station. Again what AP or FAA approved work station would install this part. This is what insures the part was built to spec. Again part is traceable. You're wrong. I don't know what else to say. Aircraft parts do not have to be traced to the manufacturer. Every part we manufactured over the last 30 years commercial and military where part marked with a manufacture number and a part number with rev. I don't know what else to say. In addition, industry standard certainly does not require trace to the manufacturer for most aircraft parts. Your wrong. Show me one part not traceable. I can show you at least twenty engine part that I dealt with today. Industry standard does NOT require trace to the manufacturer. Industry standard ONLY requires trace to the manufacturer for life limited engine and airframe parts. Please check with ASA, because you are dead wrong on this. I'm very curious as to what company you work for. First, you claim to manufacturer spare aircraft parts - under what authority do you do this? Second, I work with most major parts distributors and brokers and do not have any customers who require that spare parts be traced to a manufacturer. I also work with most every major airline in the world and they do not require spare parts to be traced to the manufacturer. You, sir, are full of it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluckyguess wrote:
"Emily" wrote in message . .. Aluckyguess wrote: snip Then an AP would have to install the part or a FAA approved station. Again what AP or FAA approved work station would install this part. This is what insures the part was built to spec. Again part is traceable. You're wrong. I don't know what else to say. Aircraft parts do not have to be traced to the manufacturer. Every part we manufactured over the last 30 years commercial and military where part marked with a manufacture number and a part number with rev. I don't know what else to say. Part number marked on a part does not necessarily mean the part is traced to the manufacturer. It has to be backed up with documentation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |