![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
karl G and Matt B, in lieu of our previous discussion about what appears to
be too low JPI CHT readings in my aircraft, I finally had the opportunity to note the ambient temperatures for all of my JPI probes today, as the aircraft had been sitting for a few days without the Tannis heater plugged in. I thought you might be interested in the readings. Outside temperature was 53 degrees F. Cylinder - EGT/CHT (degrees F) 1 - 50/52 2 - 51/56 3 - 51/53 4 - 54/55 5 - 50/52 6 - 52/52 Oil temp: 55 Like you, both JPI and Tornado Alley also recommended noting the ambient temperatures as a test of the probes' proper calibrations. JPI also added that, "The only way all probes are low at the same time simultaneously is if the calibration is off." I sent these results back to JPI to see if they agree that the probes are properly calibrated. -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter R. wrote: Cylinder - EGT/CHT (degrees F) 1 - 50/52 2 - 51/56 3 - 51/53 4 - 54/55 5 - 50/52 6 - 52/52 Oil temp: 55 That's too wide a variation. On my EI US8A, digital oil temp and OAT I had in my 182 all CHT's, EGT's, OAT and Oil temp were within 1 degree. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe you have the world's coolest runing engine. SOMEbody has too!
Karl "Peter R." wrote in message ... karl G and Matt B, in lieu of our previous discussion about what appears to be too low JPI CHT readings in my aircraft, I finally had the opportunity to note the ambient temperatures for all of my JPI probes today, as the aircraft had been sitting for a few days without the Tannis heater plugged in. I thought you might be interested in the readings. Outside temperature was 53 degrees F. Cylinder - EGT/CHT (degrees F) 1 - 50/52 2 - 51/56 3 - 51/53 4 - 54/55 5 - 50/52 6 - 52/52 Oil temp: 55 Like you, both JPI and Tornado Alley also recommended noting the ambient temperatures as a test of the probes' proper calibrations. JPI also added that, "The only way all probes are low at the same time simultaneously is if the calibration is off." I sent these results back to JPI to see if they agree that the probes are properly calibrated. -- Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Peter R. wrote: Cylinder - EGT/CHT (degrees F) 1 - 50/52 2 - 51/56 3 - 51/53 4 - 54/55 5 - 50/52 6 - 52/52 Oil temp: 55 That's too wide a variation. On my EI US8A, digital oil temp and OAT I had in my 182 all CHT's, EGT's, OAT and Oil temp were within 1 degree. Mine are all within 1 degree if the engine is cold, However if I have the engine preheat turned on (I have Reiff cylinder and sump heat), there is usually a bit more variation. I think he said that he had the tanis heat on. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ray Andraka wrote: Newps wrote: Peter R. wrote: Cylinder - EGT/CHT (degrees F) 1 - 50/52 2 - 51/56 3 - 51/53 4 - 54/55 5 - 50/52 6 - 52/52 Oil temp: 55 That's too wide a variation. On my EI US8A, digital oil temp and OAT I had in my 182 all CHT's, EGT's, OAT and Oil temp were within 1 degree. Mine are all within 1 degree if the engine is cold, However if I have the engine preheat turned on (I have Reiff cylinder and sump heat), there is usually a bit more variation. I think he said that he had the tanis heat on. I have sump heat only. With the heat on and the Kennon nose mitten on the temps are still the same. Every CHT and EGT is 80F and the oil temp is 100F, it's like July in there. That's a **** poor system if you're only seeing mid 50's with a Tanis running. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray Andraka wrote:
I think he said that he had the tanis heat on. No, the Tanis heat had not been used for the three days prior to this verification. I had mentioned the heat because when this issue came up last week, the aircraft was plugged in and I couldn't check it. -- Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
That's too wide a variation. 3 degrees? Well, in any regard, it is not the 60 to 80 degrees below ambient that I would have expected had there been a calibration problem. -- Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter R. wrote: Newps wrote: That's too wide a variation. 3 degrees? The table shows six degrees. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Peter R. wrote: Newps wrote: That's too wide a variation. 3 degrees? The table shows six degrees. I was comparing ambient temperature to all individual probes, not probe to probe variations. Ambient to each probe shows no greater than a +/-3 degrees F variance. JPI replied to my email today that the probe temperatures all looked well within their tolerances. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|