![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:24:57 -0800, "gatt"
wrote in : Wild. http://www.glumbert.com/media/flylow Your tax dollars at work. :-( Only the military is exempt from operations at speeds in excess of 250 knots below 10,000'. The kill a civilian in the US now and then due to not being able to see-and-avoid at those speeds, but oh well.... Do you think you could see-and-avoid military aircraft on a MTR? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:24:57 -0800, "gatt" wrote in : Wild. http://www.glumbert.com/media/flylow Your tax dollars at work. :-( What kind of planes are they? Doesn't look like MY tax dollars at work. -c |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gatt" wrote in message ... Wild. http://www.glumbert.com/media/flylow Looks like the "zoomies" finally learned how to really fly--from Army Aviators!!!! :-))))))) Just kidding guys, typical inter service rivalry!! :-))))))))) Paul (retired Master Army Aviator) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've done my share of low level high speed flying (B-52 340KTAS and B-1
540KTAS and higher) and I've done my share of dodging low altitude GA aircraft (500-1000ft AGL) I do not want to know how many I did not see, but those I did were far enough to miss with a Level-S. BT "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:24:57 -0800, "gatt" wrote in : Wild. http://www.glumbert.com/media/flylow Your tax dollars at work. :-( Only the military is exempt from operations at speeds in excess of 250 knots below 10,000'. The kill a civilian in the US now and then due to not being able to see-and-avoid at those speeds, but oh well.... Do you think you could see-and-avoid military aircraft on a MTR? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() gatt wrote: "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:24:57 -0800, "gatt" wrote in : Wild. http://www.glumbert.com/media/flylow Your tax dollars at work. :-( What kind of planes are they? Doesn't look like MY tax dollars at work. Those aren't your tax dollars. That's an old video and is from a foreign country. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote: Only the military is exempt from operations at speeds in excess of 250 knots below 10,000'. That's not true. 91.117 Aircraft speed. [snip] (d) If the minimum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater than the maximum speed prescribed in this section, the aircraft may be operated at that minimum speed. And the USAF has its own rules which basically mirror the FAA requirements on civilian aircraft wrt airspeed limits. Not that it's an exception rather than an exemption. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 11-202, VOLUME 3 16 FEBRUARY 2005 Flying Operations GENERAL FLIGHT RULES 5.7. Aircraft Speed. 5.7.1. Supersonic Flight. The PIC will not allow the aircraft to operate at or above Mach l except as specified in AFI 13-201. Inadvertent flights above Mach will be handled IAW AFI 13-201. 5.7.2. In the NAS. The PIC will: 5.7.2.1. Not allow their aircraft to exceed 250 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS) below 10,000 ft. MSL unless the MAJCOM has approved a higher speed IAW paragraph 5.7.5., FAA Speed Authorization. 5.7.2.2. Not allow their aircraft to exceed 200 KIAS at or below 2,500 ft. AGL within 4 NMs of the primary airport of a Class C or Class D airspace area unless authorized or required by ATC, or required to maintain the minimum safe maneuvering airspeed specified in the aircraft T.O. 5.7.2.3. Not allow their aircraft to exceed 200 KIAS in the airspace underlying a Class B airspace area designated for an airport or in a VFR corridor designated through Class B airspace area, unless required to maintain the minimum safe maneuvering airspeed specified in the aircraft T.O. [snip] 5.7.5. FAA Speed Authorization. The FAA recognizes that certain military operations and training requirements cannot be met under the terms of the FAR 91.117, Aircraft Speed, and has therefore granted a speed authorization. The authorization grants an exception to aircraft having flight characteristics that preclude safe operations at speeds below 250 KIAS by providing that if the minimum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater than the maximum speed prescribed, the aircraft may be operated at the minimum safe speed. 5.7.5.1. When the Authorization Applies. Air Force pilots may operate their aircraft below 10,000 ft. MSL, within US airspace, in excess of 250 KIAS only under the following conditions: 5.7.5.1.1. Within restricted areas. 5.7.5.1.2. Within Military Operating Areas (MOAs). 5.7.5.1.3. When operating within MAJCOM approved large-scale exercises or short-term special missions. 5.7.5.1.4. Within published IFR MTRs. 5.7.5.1.5. Within published VFR MTRs. (Exception. Aircraft will not exceed 250 KIAS on SR routes) 5.7.5.1.6. Within defined areas or routes that have been coordinated and concurred on by the proper MAJCOM and FAA regions, but have not yet been published. This provision is intended to accommodate speed requirements on an interim basis until the area/route can be published. 5.7.5.1.7. When the aircraft T.O. requires or recommends a higher speed in order to maintain safe maneuverability. If the safe maneuvering airspeed in the T.O. is listed as a range, fly the slowest speed practical in that range, based on weight and configuration. This provision is primarily to accommodate climbs/descents and terminal area operations. NOTE: Airspeeds applicable to this exemption must be published in the aircraft T.O. (Dash-1). A MAJCOM supplement or MDS specific Volume 3 does not constitute the aircraft flight manual as referenced in the FAA exemption. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
Your tax dollars at work. :-( I'm with Gatt on this one. I very seriously doubt any of my tax dollars were spent on the equipment in this video. Do you think you could see-and-avoid military aircraft on a MTR? Do you have an alternative to MTRs? -- John T http://sage1solutions.com/TknoFlyer Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com ____________________ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This video has been around for a while. The last go 'round I think the
consensus was that it was the South African airforce. I would still love it even if it were my tax dollars. The only problem is it ain't me. "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:24:57 -0800, "gatt" wrote in : Wild. http://www.glumbert.com/media/flylow Your tax dollars at work. :-( Only the military is exempt from operations at speeds in excess of 250 knots below 10,000'. The kill a civilian in the US now and then due to not being able to see-and-avoid at those speeds, but oh well.... Do you think you could see-and-avoid military aircraft on a MTR? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 2-Jan-2007, "gatt" wrote: What kind of planes are they? Doesn't look like MY tax dollars at work. -c Most of the jets in the video are Mirage F.1s and there is one quick scene tpward the end of three Alpha Jets making a low pass over an airfield. A lot of Air Forces in the world fly both types, but not the U.S. Scott Wilson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
24 Mar 2006 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 25th 06 02:23 AM |
7 Mar 2006 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 8th 06 03:44 AM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Updated List of Military Information-Exchange Forums | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 20th 05 04:13 AM |