![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hello, I've noticed during a flight the other day to Columbus that our Mode C was reading high... by about 250 feet. The altimeter seems to be indicating fine as on the ground, with the correct altimeter setting, it shows the correct altitude. As well, flying the ILS, i make a habit to check the altitude when crossing the FAF and it is correct too. Any thoughts on what the issue is? Thanks, Dico |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/11/07 07:49, Dico wrote:
Hello, I've noticed during a flight the other day to Columbus that our Mode C was reading high... by about 250 feet. The altimeter seems to be indicating fine as on the ground, with the correct altimeter setting, it shows the correct altitude. As well, flying the ILS, i make a habit to check the altitude when crossing the FAF and it is correct too. Any thoughts on what the issue is? The transponder uses its own altitude encoder, not the plane's altimeter. I think there's a regulation which states that the transponder must be within 100 feet of actual pressure altitude, so you probably should have it looked at. Thanks, Dico -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not necessarily. There are optical encoding altimeters. They are not
common, but they do exist. Jim "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... Any thoughts on what the issue is? The transponder uses its own altitude encoder, not the plane's altimeter. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dico wrote:
Hello, I've noticed during a flight the other day to Columbus that our Mode C was reading high... by about 250 feet. The altimeter seems to be indicating fine as on the ground, with the correct altimeter setting, it shows the correct altitude. As well, flying the ILS, i make a habit to check the altitude when crossing the FAF and it is correct too. Any thoughts on what the issue is? Thanks, Dico You could have water in the line. This usually causes strange readings. If it is past the Altimeter then it will not affect it. Michelle P |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dico wrote:
Hello, I've noticed during a flight the other day to Columbus that our Mode C was reading high... by about 250 feet. The altimeter seems to be indicating fine as on the ground, with the correct altimeter setting, it shows the correct altitude. As well, flying the ILS, i make a habit to check the altitude when crossing the FAF and it is correct too. Any thoughts on what the issue is? The altitude your mode C reports comes from a separate pressure transducer, not your flight instruments, so the accuracy/precision of your mode C altitude is not related to the accuracy/precision of your flight instrument. The mode C reported altitude is pressure altitude, so needs to be corrected for barometric pressure for comparison with your flight instrument. The altitude shown on ATC's display is corrected to the local altimeter setting, but the raw data from your transponder is not. Mode C altitude typically has a resolution of 100 feet, which gives rise to possible sizable rounding errors. Newer pressure transducers used with TSO146 GPSs have a resolution of 10 feet. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 11, 7:49 am, "Dico" wrote:
Hello, I've noticed during a flight the other day to Columbus that our Mode C was reading high... by about 250 feet. The altimeter seems to be indicating fine as on the ground, with the correct altimeter setting, it shows the correct altitude. As well, flying the ILS, i make a habit to check the altitude when crossing the FAF and it is correct too. Any thoughts on what the issue is? 1) the attitude from your transponder is pressure altitude, ATC corrects for pressure. 2) I learned long ago not to try to debug issues with transponders, they seem to be well out of the range of non-radio,electronics people. However, generally adjustments are very inexpensive. In fact, most places that quote fixed price IFR certs include basic adjustments to the transponder. Every time I bring my plane in for IFR cert they have to do some tuning of the unit. -Robert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
......somebody in rec.aviation.ifr would just *love* this one.....
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... 1) the attitude from your transponder is pressure altitude, ATC corrects for pressure. snip -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why?
dlevy wrote: .....somebody in rec.aviation.ifr would just *love* this one..... "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... 1) the attitude from your transponder is pressure altitude, ATC corrects for pressure. snip -Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transponder attitude is not corrected by ATC. Never has and never will be.
I, as the pilot in command, control transponder attitude. I'll shut the damn thing off. "Newps" wrote in message . .. Why? dlevy wrote: .....somebody in rec.aviation.ifr would just *love* this one..... "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... 1) the attitude from your transponder is pressure altitude, ATC corrects for pressure. snip -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 3:38 pm, "dlevy" wrote:
Transponder attitude is not corrected by ATC. Never has and never will be. I, as the pilot in command, control transponder attitude. I'll shut the damn thing off. How do you control the altitude the transponder puts out? -Robert, CFII |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New transponder mode S vs. mode C | Tom N. | Soaring | 39 | November 7th 06 07:40 AM |
Winter mechanical vario reading high | Alan Meyer | Soaring | 13 | April 13th 06 02:38 AM |
IFR reading | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | February 24th 05 09:12 PM |
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... | Dave S | Home Built | 8 | June 2nd 04 04:12 PM |
high copper reading in oil analysis | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | March 26th 04 03:32 PM |