![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I've been looking at the possibilty of buying and owning a 1977 Hawk XP that is very near its 1500 TBO. As I understand it, starting in 1979, the engine TBO went to 2000. What is the difference and can the 2000 TBO engine be put in the 1977 Hawk XP? Or can the changes that make it a 2000 TBO vs 1500 TBO be applied to the enginer during a rebuild? What costs are involved in making this change? What other differences are there between a 1979-1981 Hawk XP and a 1977? Thanks, John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Johnny Google" wrote in message oups.com... : Hi all, : : I've been looking at the possibilty of buying and owning a 1977 Hawk : XP that is very near its 1500 TBO. : : As I understand it, starting in 1979, the engine TBO went to 2000. : : What is the difference and can the 2000 TBO engine be put in the 1977 : Hawk XP? : Or can the changes that make it a 2000 TBO vs 1500 TBO be applied to : the enginer during a rebuild? : : What costs are involved in making this change? : : What other differences are there between a 1979-1981 Hawk XP and a : 1977? : : Thanks, : : John : TBO number is just a recommendation for USA CFR 14 part 91 operations... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand to beef up the engine from the IO-360-K to the IO-360-KB
(2000), one needs a stronger crankcase and crankshaft. Costs? Differences between the years: The FAA TCDS 3A17 page 20 shows the IO-360-KB commenced installation in S/N R1722930 - thru to 3454 (ie from year 1979-1981). I cannot see any other differences other than TBO. Why are peoples thoughts on a FADEC installtion, when approved for that engine? regards Ron "Blueskies" wrote in message . net... "Johnny Google" wrote in message oups.com... : Hi all, : : I've been looking at the possibilty of buying and owning a 1977 Hawk : XP that is very near its 1500 TBO. : : As I understand it, starting in 1979, the engine TBO went to 2000. : : What is the difference and can the 2000 TBO engine be put in the 1977 : Hawk XP? : Or can the changes that make it a 2000 TBO vs 1500 TBO be applied to : the enginer during a rebuild? : : What costs are involved in making this change? : : What other differences are there between a 1979-1981 Hawk XP and a : 1977? : : Thanks, : : John : TBO number is just a recommendation for USA CFR 14 part 91 operations... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
14V for R1722000-2724, then 28V for R1722725 (1978+) onwards.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 8:36 pm, "Johnny Google" wrote:
Hi all, I've been looking at the possibilty of buying and owning a 1977 Hawk XP that is very near its 1500 TBO. As I understand it, starting in 1979, the engine TBO went to 2000. What is the difference and can the 2000 TBO engine be put in the 1977 Hawk XP? Or can the changes that make it a 2000 TBO vs 1500 TBO be applied to the enginer during a rebuild? What costs are involved in making this change? What other differences are there between a 1979-1981 Hawk XP and a 1977? Thanks, John Real question is: How is it running? Probability of going past TBO depends a lot on the condition of the cylinders which depends a lot on how often it's been flown and other factors. The other thing that blows the whistle on these IO360 engines is something cracked on the case. I've seen this on turbo Skymasters especially. If it's running OK, who cares where it is relative to TBO? Could easily go past 1500. If it's not running OK, doesn't matter whether it's a KB or not. If you are up in the yellow arc of tbo, you will find that it won't be economical to fix a few bad cylinders and you will be facing TBO when cylinders start to wheeze. I have a hunch it won't make it much past 1500 in any event. You should buy it as if it's run out and you have to major it tommorrow. And then you would upgrade it to a KB. FWIW. Bill Hale A&P |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 8:34 am, " wrote:
On Apr 4, 8:36 pm, "Johnny Google" wrote: Hi all, I've been looking at the possibilty of buying and owning a 1977 Hawk XP that is very near its 1500 TBO. As I understand it, starting in 1979, the engine TBO went to 2000. What is the difference and can the 2000 TBO engine be put in the 1977 Hawk XP? Or can the changes that make it a 2000 TBO vs 1500 TBO be applied to the enginer during a rebuild? What costs are involved in making this change? What other differences are there between a 1979-1981 Hawk XP and a 1977? Thanks, John Real question is: How is it running? Probability of going past TBO depends a lot on the condition of the cylinders which depends a lot on how often it's been flown and other factors. The other thing that blows the whistle on these IO360 engines is something cracked on the case. I've seen this on turbo Skymasters especially. If it's running OK, who cares where it is relative to TBO? Could easily go past 1500. If it's not running OK, doesn't matter whether it's a KB or not. If you are up in the yellow arc of tbo, you will find that it won't be economical to fix a few bad cylinders and you will be facing TBO when cylinders start to wheeze. I have a hunch it won't make it much past 1500 in any event. You should buy it as if it's run out and you have to major it tommorrow. And then you would upgrade it to a KB. FWIW. Bill Hale A&P- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bill, Actually, that is exactly what I was trying to make sure I *could* do - my question was geared towards determining if it was possible, how the change works - must you purchase a entirely different engine, or does a particular modification change the engine from a K to a KB, and what costs are involved in going from a K to a KB. (or is it the same costs assuming it is time to overhaul anyway) Thanks, John |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 9:56 am, "Johnny Google" wrote:
On Apr 5, 8:34 am, " wrote: On Apr 4, 8:36 pm, "Johnny Google" wrote: Hi all, I've been looking at the possibilty of buying and owning a 1977 Hawk XP that is very near its 1500 TBO. As I understand it, starting in 1979, the engine TBO went to 2000. What is the difference and can the 2000 TBO engine be put in the 1977 Hawk XP? Or can the changes that make it a 2000 TBO vs 1500 TBO be applied to the enginer during a rebuild? What costs are involved in making this change? What other differences are there between a 1979-1981 Hawk XP and a 1977? Thanks, John Real question is: How is it running? Probability of going past TBO depends a lot on the condition of the cylinders which depends a lot on how often it's been flown and other factors. The other thing that blows the whistle on these IO360 engines is something cracked on the case. I've seen this on turbo Skymasters especially. If it's running OK, who cares where it is relative to TBO? Could easily go past 1500. If it's not running OK, doesn't matter whether it's a KB or not. If you are up in the yellow arc of tbo, you will find that it won't be economical to fix a few bad cylinders and you will be facing TBO when cylinders start to wheeze. I have a hunch it won't make it much past 1500 in any event. You should buy it as if it's run out and you have to major it tommorrow. And then you would upgrade it to a KB. FWIW. Bill Hale A&P- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bill, Actually, that is exactly what I was trying to make sure I *could* do - my question was geared towards determining if it was possible, how the change works - must you purchase a entirely different engine, or does a particular modification change the engine from a K to a KB, and what costs are involved in going from a K to a KB. (or is it the same costs assuming it is time to overhaul anyway) Thanks, John- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Also wanted to note I agree that if the engine is running fine, I won't be making this change or overhaul prematurely - just want to know what options I have when I do have to overhaul. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 6:28 am, "Ron" wrote:
I understand to beef up the engine from the IO-360-K to the IO-360-KB (2000), one needs a stronger crankcase and crankshaft. Costs? Differences between the years: The FAA TCDS 3A17 page 20 shows the IO-360-KB commenced installation in S/N R1722930 - thru to 3454 (ie from year 1979-1981). I cannot see any other differences other than TBO. Why are peoples thoughts on a FADEC installtion, when approved for that engine? regards Ron "Blueskies" wrote in message . net... "Johnny Google" wrote in message roups.com... : Hi all, : : I've been looking at the possibilty of buying and owning a 1977 Hawk : XP that is very near its 1500 TBO. : : As I understand it, starting in 1979, the engine TBO went to 2000. : : What is the difference and can the 2000 TBO engine be put in the 1977 : Hawk XP? : Or can the changes that make it a 2000 TBO vs 1500 TBO be applied to : the enginer during a rebuild? : : What costs are involved in making this change? : : What other differences are there between a 1979-1981 Hawk XP and a : 1977? : : Thanks, : : John : TBO number is just a recommendation for USA CFR 14 part 91 operations...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ron, Thanks - so, one could make a K into a KB by replacing the crankshaft and crankcase? Is there a way to see if this is really all the changes? Perhaps Continental or Cessna? Is there a online source to go and retrieve information like this? Thanks, John |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Johnny Google wrote:
Actually, that is exactly what I was trying to make sure I *could* do - my question was geared towards determining if it was possible, how the change works - must you purchase a entirely different engine, or does a particular modification change the engine from a K to a KB, and what costs are involved in going from a K to a KB. (or is it the same costs assuming it is time to overhaul anyway) It's possible to change an engine from one model to another at overhaul. If the differences are simple, it can be done by an overhaul shop. The devil is in the details, and Continental will be the keeper of the details in this case. The more common option is to swap your old K for a KB at overhaul time. The case and the crankshaft represent the two most expensive parts to replace. It may actually be cheaper to do a swap. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 2:54 pm, "JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote:
Johnny Google wrote: Actually, that is exactly what I was trying to make sure I *could* do - my question was geared towards determining if it was possible, how the change works - must you purchase a entirely different engine, or does a particular modification change the engine from a K to a KB, and what costs are involved in going from a K to a KB. (or is it the same costs assuming it is time to overhaul anyway) It's possible to change an engine from one model to another at overhaul. If the differences are simple, it can be done by an overhaul shop. The devil is in the details, and Continental will be the keeper of the details in this case. The more common option is to swap your old K for a KB at overhaul time. The case and the crankshaft represent the two most expensive parts to replace. It may actually be cheaper to do a swap. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted viahttp://www.aviationkb.com Thanks - Does someone have recent / realistic costs associated with swapping a K for a KB at overhaul on a 172 XP? Is it a standard rebuilt engine cost for the KB (if so - what is this cost for this engine) and would get some sort of core or exchange value for the K you are 'swaping' ? Assuming that even if I get another 500 hours out of this 360-K, I would like to know what total costs will be involved in swapping out for a 360-KB? Any one recently gone through this with their XP? Thanks, John |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Curtiss Hawk 75 | JDupre5762 | Restoration | 0 | June 22nd 04 01:34 AM |
I have my new Sparrow Hawk | Patrick McLaughlin | Soaring | 36 | May 9th 04 04:37 AM |
Black Hawk down | C.H. | Military Aviation | 0 | November 15th 03 05:31 PM |
Is Hawk 128 "yesterday's jet"? | Urban Fredriksson | Military Aviation | 7 | August 8th 03 07:31 AM |
Hawk 200 questions | Kerry Ferrand | Military Aviation | 14 | July 31st 03 11:14 AM |