![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A NASA CV-990, modified as a Landing Systems Research Aircraft (LSRA), is
serviced on the ramp at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California, before a test of the space shuttle landing gear system. The space shuttle landing gear test unit, operated by a high-pressure hydraulic system, allowed engineers to assess and document the performance of space shuttle main and nose landing gear systems, tires and wheel assemblies, plus braking and nose wheel steering performance. The series of 155 test missions for the space shuttle program provided extensive data about the life and endurance of the shuttle tire systems and helped raise the shuttle crosswind landing limits at Kennedy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't the CV-990 the same type aircraft that collided with a P-3 on approach
to Moffett Field in the early 70's? There was only one survivor from that crash and he got run over by a crash truck while unconscious on the ground. Rob "J.F." wrote in message ... A NASA CV-990, modified as a Landing Systems Research Aircraft (LSRA), is serviced on the ramp at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California, before a test of the space shuttle landing gear system. The space shuttle landing gear test unit, operated by a high-pressure hydraulic system, allowed engineers to assess and document the performance of space shuttle main and nose landing gear systems, tires and wheel assemblies, plus braking and nose wheel steering performance. The series of 155 test missions for the space shuttle program provided extensive data about the life and endurance of the shuttle tire systems and helped raise the shuttle crosswind landing limits at Kennedy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting. I'll have to research that. Thanks for the reply.
"Scubabix" wrote in message ... Isn't the CV-990 the same type aircraft that collided with a P-3 on approach to Moffett Field in the early 70's? There was only one survivor from that crash and he got run over by a crash truck while unconscious on the ground. Rob "J.F." wrote in message ... A NASA CV-990, modified as a Landing Systems Research Aircraft (LSRA), is serviced on the ramp at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California, before a test of the space shuttle landing gear system. The space shuttle landing gear test unit, operated by a high-pressure hydraulic system, allowed engineers to assess and document the performance of space shuttle main and nose landing gear systems, tires and wheel assemblies, plus braking and nose wheel steering performance. The series of 155 test missions for the space shuttle program provided extensive data about the life and endurance of the shuttle tire systems and helped raise the shuttle crosswind landing limits at Kennedy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a left-hand pattern west of the air station. There are two parallel
runways at NAS Moffett Field, California 32L and 32R. Only the right runway was equipped for Moffett Field, located 30 miles south of San Francisco, California, was a busy facility in 1973. The air station was the headquarters for all US Navy patrol activity in the Pacific, and in this role it was home to many patrol squadrons flying the Lockheed P-3Orion. NAS Moffett Field California was also home to NASA's Ames Research Center, which at the time operated a wide variety of research and experimental aircraft. On April 12, 1973, a Navy P-3C and a Convair 990 operated by NASA collided while on final approach to Moffett field, killing 16 of the 17 people aboard the two aircraft. The Navy P-3C, bureau number 157332, was assigned to Patrol Squadron 47 (VP-47). It had departed NAS Moffett Field, California for a training flight approximately five and a half hours prior to the accident. LT Stephen A. Schwarting was in command of the P-3,along with two pilots in training, a flight engineer, and two observers. LT Schwarting had been a Navy pilot for five years, and at age 29 he had logged 2014 flight hours, 1014 of those in P-3aircraft. During the first part of the training flight, the P-3 operated over the ocean off of Big Sur, California. The P-3 and its crew then returned to NAS Moffett Field, California to practice approaches and landings. At the time of the accident, the P-3 crew had been flying approaches to touch-and-go landings on runway 32L for about an hour and a half, circling instrument approaches, but on the day of this collision the weather was fair and the visibility was excellent. While the P-3 was flying approaches on runway 32L, a Convair 990 operated by NASA was south of NAS Moffett Field, California flying a straight in approach. The Convair 990 was a flying laboratory, nicknamed Galileo, which was operated in conjunction with scientific programs at Ames Research Center. The Convair 990, N711NA, was delivered to NASA in 1964 and was one of four 990 models operated by NASA over the years. On the day of the accident Galileo was returning from a two hour flight over Monterey Bay to test a newly installed system for surveying migratory sea mammals. In past experiments Galileo had chased the 1967 solar eclipse, taken astronomers aloft to study comets, and it had last been used in a joint Soviet-American survey of the Bering Sea. The pilot of Galileo was James P. Riley, age 28. There were a total of eleven men on board Galileo: seven were NASA employees, Northrop, Inc. employed two and Teledyne, Inc employed two. Galileo's pilot first contacted the NAS Moffett Field, California tower at 1446, stating that he was ten miles south of the air station and requesting a straight-in approach. At that time the air traffic controller instructed Galileo's' pilot to approach runway 32R and to contact the tower when he was seven miles south of the air station. There were other aircraft in the pattern at the time, and shortly after his exchange with Galileo, the controller stated to another aircraft that there were numerous P-3's in left traffic for runway 32. At 1448, the pilot of the P-3 contacted the tower and stated that he was turning base with wheels down, for touch and go. The controller acknowledged that transmission and instructed the pilot to continue for the left side. Seconds later, Galileo's pilot contacted the controller and stated that he was seven miles south of the air station. The controller acknowledged the transmission from Galileo, and after an exchange with another aircraft, the controller instructed the Galileo to continue for the right side.. At 1449, the pilot of Galileo contacted the tower and stated gear down and locked. The controller replied by informing the pilot of the wind speed and direction, and then without explanation he stated that Galileo was cleared to land 32L. The pilot of Galileo did not question the change in runway clearance, but acknowledged it by stating 32L, thank you. A few moments later the air traffic control transcript contains a transmission that is probably from LT Schwartings P-3, stating touch and go on left side. The tower acknowledged this transmission by instructing the P-3 to continue. At this point the two aircraft began to converge on the left runway approach. At 1450, the air traffic control transcript contains an unidentified transmission that states "Tower you got that" followed by a second, garbled transmission. The controller replied to these two transmissions by saying "go around, go around, weave". The controller then instructed all aircraft in the pattern to climb and maintain 1500ft. By that time the P-3 and Galileo had collided and crashed together about one half-mile south of the runway. At the time of the collision Galileo was apparently above the P-3, descending on a converging path. According to the official Navy investigation, the fuselage at the base of the P-3s vertical fin showed evidence of two tire marks that matched the dual nose tires of Galileo. In addition to that, three pieces of the P-3s fuselage frame were found embedded in the nose wheels of Galileo. According to eyewitnesses, the P-3 pulled up sharply in the moment before the collision, perhaps in an evasive action. Galileo struck the upper aft fuselage of the P-3 and the two aircraft crashed entangled on the l2th tee of the Sunnyvale Municipal Golf Course. A large fire immediately engulfed the two wrecked aircraft. Although there were people playing golf nearby, miraculously no one on the ground was hurt. The crash scene quickly became chaotic. The two aircraft crashed just 200 yards from the Bay shore Freeway, and drivers left their cars to scale the fence and rush to the burning wreckage. Golfers, and people from nearby office buildings who had seen the crash also swarmed around the site. The large number of onlookers made access difficult for the crews responding from NAS Moffett Field, California and Sunnyvale. At the time of the crash a group of firemen were watching a demonstration of a jaws of life rescue device at the Mountain View training center. When they saw the crash they loaded the rescue equipment and went to the scene. All of the sixteen men who were killed died in the crash or in the fire that followed it. The one survivor was Petty Officer Third Class Bruce N. Mallibert, who was an observer on the P-3. One of the golfers at the crash scene found Mallibert seriously injured and lying unconscious outside of the wreckage, and mistakenly thought that he was dead. He covered Malliberts body with a parachute, but soon after that a fireman checked Mallibert and discovered that he was still alive. Mallibert was lucky to have survived the crash, but he would escape death a second time minutes later. While the parachute covered him a fire truck drove over him, unaware that he was underneath. Miraculously, the trucks wheels missed Mallibert on both sides. He was taken to a nearby hospital where he remained in critical condition for many days. This crash renewed calls for the Navy to leave NAS Moffett Field, California , and several local members of Congress called for a halt to flying from Moffett in the days following the crash. While there had been a large number of crashes around the air station when it was a home to fighters and attack aircraft in the 1950s, the safety record of the P-3 operations was excellent. This collision was the first and only crash of a P-3 near the airfield between the early 1960s and 1994 when the Navy decommissioned NAS Moffett Field, California With the loss of Galileo, NASA lost a unique research asset in addition to losing several of the scientists who had helped to develop the flying laboratory and its experiments. Many of the programs that were to use Galileo were either delayed for years or were cancelled completely following the crash. This accident apparently occurred because of a simple mistake in air traffic control procedures. Neither of the aircraft suffered mechanical problems, the weather was excellent, and the crew aboard each aircraft was well trained and experienced. Sixteen men and two valuable aircraft were lost, but hopefully future accidents were averted by an increased awareness of the factors that caused this tragedy. According to eyewitnesses, the P-3 pulled up sharply in the moment before the collision, perhaps in an evasive action. Galileo struck the upper aft fuselage of the P-3 and the two aircraft crashed entangled on the l2th tee of the Sunnyvale Municipal Golf Course. A large fire immediately engulfed the two wrecked aircraft. Although there were people playing golf nearby, miraculously no one on the ground was hurt. The crash scene quickly became chaotic. The two, aircraft crashed just 200 yards from the Bay shore Freeway, and drivers left their cars to scale the fence and rush to the burning wreckage. Golfers, and people from nearby office buildings who had seen the crash also swarmed around the site. The large number of onlookers made access difficult for the fire crews responding from NAS Moffett Field, California and Sunnyvale. At the time of the crash a group of firemen were watching a demonstration of a jaws of life rescue device at the Mountain View fire training center. When they saw the crash they loaded the rescue equipment and went to the scene. "Scubabix" wrote in message ... Isn't the CV-990 the same type aircraft that collided with a P-3 on approach to Moffett Field in the early 70's? There was only one survivor from that crash and he got run over by a crash truck while unconscious on the ground. Rob "J.F." wrote in message ... A NASA CV-990, modified as a Landing Systems Research Aircraft (LSRA), is serviced on the ramp at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California, before a test of the space shuttle landing gear system. The space shuttle landing gear test unit, operated by a high-pressure hydraulic system, allowed engineers to assess and document the performance of space shuttle main and nose landing gear systems, tires and wheel assemblies, plus braking and nose wheel steering performance. The series of 155 test missions for the space shuttle program provided extensive data about the life and endurance of the shuttle tire systems and helped raise the shuttle crosswind landing limits at Kennedy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now that's some research. Thanks for the added info. I knew if I asked a
question here that someone would know the answer. Rob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All of the sixteen men who were killed died in the crash or in the fire that
followed it. The one survivor was Petty Officer Third Class Bruce N. Mallibert, Bruce did survive, though ended up wheelchair bound for life. He married my sister's best friend, Kathy Keehan. Kathy succumbed to cancer a few years ago. I never met him myself, and I don't know anything of his religious beliefs prior to the accident, but post crash he was and is, a very devout Christian. I lived about a mile from the crash site at the time and remember it very well. Jon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I worked at NASA Ames Research Center a few years, 1974-1976 in high
school and college work experience programs. They had a 990 mounted on a pair of cradles outside the hangers, wings and tail torn off. I was told it had been damaged in a hard landing the Philippines. A few of us students were selected to cap the torn wings and tail with smooth sheet metal, to clean up the appearance. We were told it was going to be set up to train researchers to work in an aircraft setting. I noticed while browsing Ames via Google Earth, that fuselage is gone. Anyone know what happened to it? We had fun that summer, crawling around the belly, and even up into the center fuel tank. Man, is that a tight squeeze! Ah, stupid and immortal youth.... Most memorable moment was finding a small hatch near the back. Reaching up with a length of aluminum angle, we popped it open to find an open round fitting and a t-handle. Being stupid kids and curious, we fashioned a lasso and got it around the t-handle and yanked. Well, someone had been using the aft restroom, and luckily for us, there was just enough advance gurgling that we -barely- escaped the stream as the aft toilet reservoir emptied itself on the ground... I also got to do a bit of work in the flying CV990 they operated then, working with the journeymen. Ah, those were the days.... Jon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 12:12:41 -0700, Jon Anderson
wrote: I worked at NASA Ames Research Center a few years, 1974-1976 in high school and college work experience programs. I also got to do a bit of work in the flying CV990 they operated then, working with the journeymen. Ah, those were the days.... My first real job in '58-9 was as a high school student "engineering assistant" for Convair in SD, mostly at Convair Astro out on Kearney Mesa. They were building the F106 in the long plant along the highway, on the east end of Lindbergh Field. The 990s were being assembled in the big hangar on the south side of the airport road, across from Ryan, which is now the commuter aircraft terminal. That hangar is now Coast Guard. The 880 and especially 990 had efficiency and performance advantages over the Boeing and Douglas birds, but they were late to the game, and developed without urgency. Occasionally we'd have a B-36 come in ... really filled up the small and short Lindbergh runway. Cheers, Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
slightly OT - NASA ER-2 | Skywise | Piloting | 23 | April 25th 06 12:36 AM |
What has NASA done for you? | BobGoFish | Piloting | 34 | August 9th 05 08:14 PM |
NASA Jet Might Have Hit Record 5,000 Mph | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 0 | March 28th 04 04:03 PM |
It all began at NASA.... | Mike Marron | Military Aviation | 1 | February 29th 04 06:23 PM |
The Picture NASA Does NOT Want You To See | Bill Kambic | Naval Aviation | 5 | January 16th 04 10:22 PM |