![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 I was just thumbing through a publication my fiance happen to subscribe for me as a birthday present, and they had an ad in there for the Big South Fork Airpark/Scott Municipal, in Oneida, TN (KSCX). In wanting to find out more about it, I pull it up on Airnav, and see that Runway 23 has an SDF approach. It looks like a LOC approach, no OM, MM, IM, or glideslope. So my question is, what exactly is this type of approach, and how does it differ from a LOC approach? BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJFVIyBkZmuMZ8L8RAqEsAJ9byUmUyDp1l80YTlO+jT EF9159dgCff7XU ig72lDvGiAhdOs12FC2OCSs= =e5kX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote in
t: In wanting to find out more about it, I pull it up on Airnav, and see that Runway 23 has an SDF approach. It looks like a LOC approach, no OM, MM, IM, or glideslope. So my question is, what exactly is this type of approach, and how does it differ from a LOC approach? The Simplified Directional Facility is similar to a Localizer but may be offset from the runway and the course may be wider than a Localizer. -- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 12:04 am, A Guy Called Tyketto
wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was just thumbing through a publication my fiance happen to subscribe for me as a birthday present, and they had an ad in there for the Big South Fork Airpark/Scott Municipal, in Oneida, TN (KSCX). In wanting to find out more about it, I pull it up on Airnav, and see that Runway 23 has an SDF approach. It looks like a LOC approach, no OM, MM, IM, or glideslope. So my question is, what exactly is this type of approach, and how does it differ from a LOC approach? BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJFVIyBkZmuMZ8L8RAqEsAJ9byUmUyDp1l80YTlO+jT EF9159dgCff7XU ig72lDvGiAhdOs12FC2OCSs= =e5kX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- /the course is not as accurate (wider), otherwise probably close to the same |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Thank you both, John and Swag. This has been very educating. I'll have to go out there one of these days to see it in use. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJG5GyBkZmuMZ8L8RAhbNAKDDEe6FroZ6dI6TA6tzYH SZxMzh0wCgxgJ2 RwGO73vPim0DUnR7MWdkGeQ= =LX4d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Godwin wrote:
In wanting to find out more about it, I pull it up on Airnav, and see that Runway 23 has an SDF approach. It looks like a LOC approach, no OM, MM, IM, or glideslope. So my question is, what exactly is this type of approach, and how does it differ from a LOC approach? The Simplified Directional Facility is similar to a Localizer but may be offset from the runway and the course may be wider than a Localizer. The important thing to know is that you fly it just like you fly a localizer... just don't be surprised if the runway is angled away from you a little bit when you break out. I used to have to fly an SDF approach into Greenville, NC all the time. Washington Center would give radar vectors until I picked up the NDB that was the IAF for the approach, then it was all on me. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 05:45:40 -0000, John Godwin
wrote in : The Simplified Directional Facility is similar to a Localizer but may be offset from the runway and the course may be wider than a Localizer. How does an SDF approach differ from an Localizer-type Directional Aid (LDA) approach? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 05:45:40 -0000, John Godwin wrote in : The Simplified Directional Facility is similar to a Localizer but may be offset from the runway and the course may be wider than a Localizer. How does an SDF approach differ from an Localizer-type Directional Aid (LDA) approach? A LOC (whether aligned with the runway or LDA) will have a tighter width. While it varies in angular dimension because from approach to approach, the loc angular width is about 3 degrees. The SDF is 6 or 12. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:08:08 -0400, Ron Natalie
wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 05:45:40 -0000, John Godwin wrote in : The Simplified Directional Facility is similar to a Localizer but may be offset from the runway and the course may be wider than a Localizer. How does an SDF approach differ from an Localizer-type Directional Aid (LDA) approach? A LOC (whether aligned with the runway or LDA) will have a tighter width. While it varies in angular dimension because from approach to approach, the loc angular width is about 3 degrees. The SDF is 6 or 12. Thanks. My instrument training didn't cover SDF approaches. Are they new or just few in number? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
A LOC (whether aligned with the runway or LDA) will have a tighter width. While it varies in angular dimension because from approach to approach, the loc angular width is about 3 degrees. The SDF is 6 or 12. Thanks. My instrument training didn't cover SDF approaches. Are they new or just few in number? Old; few in number. Very few in number. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: A LOC (whether aligned with the runway or LDA) will have a tighter width. While it varies in angular dimension because from approach to approach, the loc angular width is about 3 degrees. The SDF is 6 or 12. Thanks. My instrument training didn't cover SDF approaches. Are they new or just few in number? Old; few in number. Very few in number. Something like 26 in the entire country. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First LPV approach | Viperdoc[_4_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | March 5th 07 03:23 AM |
ILS or LOC approach? | Dan Wegman | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | May 9th 05 11:41 PM |
ILS or LOC Approach | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | May 26th 04 07:29 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Brief an approach | Ditch | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | October 14th 03 12:10 AM |