If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
My flying club has recently started charging out its 172's based on tach
time rather than Hobbes time. In my experience fixed pitched airplanes I've rented have been charged out based on Hobbes, while constant speed airplanes have been charged out based on tach. So recently, a friend and I took a 172 to do some pattern work. We were out a little over an hour according to the Hobbes meter and our wris****ches, but the tach registered about half that. Now I've flown a 182 and noticed about a 10% to 15% difference between Hobbes and tach time depending on what I was doing. Especially in the pattern, I never noticed anything like a 50% difference. So I began to think about it. With a fixed pitch prop, at a given throttle setting, rpms will drop in a climb and increase in a descent. They also drop when the throttle is pulled back. Hence our low tach time in the pattern -- lower than peak rpms in the climb, then low rpms on the downwind and descent because of the reduced throttle. In the 182, however, you have near or maximum rpms in the climb and, with the propeller fully forward, higher rpms in the pattern and descent than you would in a 172 with a similar throttle setting. Hence the tach time should be higher in the 182 than in the 172 despite similar wear and tear on the airplane. So, this got me thinking. Given a 172 charged out based on tach time, what would be the most expensive way and the cheapest way to get from point a to point b? Most expensive -- climb at Vy+5 knots, then cruise at a TAS of 110 knots. Cheapest -- do a Vx climb to altitude (to keep the rpms low); when at altitude, chop the power completely and start a descent. After descending for a while, climb back to altitude at Vx. Repeat until reaching destination (or sick, whichever comes first). Am I crazy? Isn't this why fixed pitch equipped airplanes are usually charged out based on Hobbes time? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
So recently, a friend and I took a 172 to do some pattern work. We were
out a little over an hour according to the Hobbes meter and our wris****ches, but the tach registered about half that. Something is probably wrong. We have two Archers (fixed pitch) and a Dakota (constant speed), and I've never gotten that much of a difference. Taxiing time is far less expensive, because I'm taxiing at less than half max rpm. But simple pattern work? Check the meters. Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
On Apr 30, 11:50 am, Charlie Axilbund wrote:
My flying club has recently started charging out its 172's based on tach time rather than Hobbes time. In my experience fixed pitched airplanes I've rented have been charged out based on Hobbes, while constant speed airplanes have been charged out based on tach. So recently, a friend and I took a 172 to do some pattern work. We were out a little over an hour according to the Hobbes meter and our wris****ches, but the tach registered about half that. Because all the time on taxiing and all the time abeam when you pull power are virtually free. -Robert, CFII |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
On Apr 30, 4:53 pm, Jose wrote:
Because all the time on taxiing and all the time abeam when you pull power are virtually free. No, it's not "free". It's half price, maybe. (1200 rpm?) The rest of it is full price. Jose -- 1200 sounds a bit too high for taxiing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
Most places I am aware of charge simply by Hobbs Time. The general
rule of thumb arround here is that on an average the Tach time will be 80% of the hobbs time. Most businesses do it this way because Hobbs time generates more revenue for the airplane per maintenanence hour. Example: If they charge $100 Hobbs for the airplane. They get about $120 for every Tach Hour. Since they do maintenance off of Tach time they get an extra $2000 for every 100 hours put on the airplane over charging Tach time. I do understand why clubs might prefer to charge by Tach, but they usually do so by charging a higher rate than if they were charging by hobbs. Charging by Tach encourages the pilots to throttle back some which can make the engine last longer. It makes sense to me to charge by Hobbs on constant speed props because charging by Tach encourages running High MFP and Low RPM. Low RPM is ok but need to keep the MFP in line with it as well. With the fixed pitch prop, the roller coaster approach is probably the least expensive. This is simlar to what motor gliders do for cross country. 2nd would probably be to simply run at the best economy cruise. Brian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
1200 sounds a bit too high for taxiing.
It is. And it's low for windmilling. But it's in the (half price) ballpark. Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
In a previous article, Charlie Axilbund said:
So recently, a friend and I took a 172 to do some pattern work. We were out a little over an hour according to the Hobbes meter and our wris****ches, but the tach registered about half that. Now I've flown a That seems like an excessive difference. Our club charges by tach time, and the tach is calibrated for 2400 rpm. With an Archer in the pattern, I'm usually 2450 on climb out, 2000 on downwind, and 1600 on base and final. When I was training, I got about a 15-25% premium on days when all I did was pattern work. Now I fly mostly a Dakota and a Lance, and the rpm/mp chart on the back of the sun visor shows valid 65% power setting at 2200 or 2300 rpm for the altitudes I normally fly. That gives a tiny premium, but nowhere near what I got doing pattern work. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ My group's mission statement - 'You want *what* ? By *WHEN* ?' -- Simon Burr |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
On 2007-04-30, Brian wrote:
It makes sense to me to charge by Hobbs on constant speed props because charging by Tach encourages running High MFP and Low RPM. Low RPM is ok but need to keep the MFP in line with it as well. That's an old wives' tale, I'm afraid. The best regime to operate an engine (most efficient and least maintenance) is the lowest RPM and highest MP for the desired power setting. There are some caveats (some aircraft have a range of RPMs which you should not continuously operate the engine), but generally speaking, using the lowest RPM possible for the desired power setting results in less noise, less vibration and less wear on the engine. The thing about operating engines (specifically normally aspirated flat engines like most of us use) 'above square' is hogwash, I'm afraid. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
Doesn't this also bring up the question of when is an overhaul due
(according to hours)? At 2000 hobbs hours or 2000 tach hours? Lou |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Charging for tach time in a fixed pitch airplane
On Apr 30, 12:50 pm, Charlie Axilbund wrote:
So, this got me thinking. Given a 172 charged out based on tach time, what would be the most expensive way and the cheapest way to get from point a to point b? Most expensive -- climb at Vy+5 knots, then cruise at a TAS of 110 knots. Cheapest -- do a Vx climb to altitude (to keep the rpms low); when at altitude, chop the power completely and start a descent. After descending for a while, climb back to altitude at Vx. Repeat until reaching destination (or sick, whichever comes first). Am I crazy? Isn't this why fixed pitch equipped airplanes are usually charged out based on Hobbes time? Remember your training: check the POH. The setting you want is the best range setting, which will give you the best distance for RPM in a fixed-pitch airplane. If the airplane is really old and doesn't have a range column in the cruise chart, you can find it by reducing the power in cruise 100 RPM at a time, then allowing the airspeed to stabilize and trimming for level flight. Keep track of the airspeed decrease each time until you get a really large ASI drop, then go back to the last setting. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch | Nathan Young | Owning | 25 | October 10th 04 04:41 AM |
Logging Time Consistently - Hobbs AND Tach | Carl Orton | Piloting | 11 | June 29th 04 09:52 PM |
First time airplane buyer, First time posting | Jessewright8 | Owning | 3 | June 3rd 04 02:08 PM |
Tach Vs. Hobbs Time | John Roncallo | Owning | 33 | January 7th 04 12:42 AM |
Next Time I Do Fabric Work on an Airplane | Larry Smith | Home Built | 11 | November 22nd 03 06:23 AM |