|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
May 2nd 07, 04:41 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
Old(ish) scans - 14 - Short SD
--
Andrew "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) 
|
|
#2
May 2nd 07, 04:52 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old(ish) scans - 14 - Short SD
Andrew B wrote:
-- Andrew "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) Those flying sheds were brilliant! -- Moving things in still pictures!
|
|
#3
May 2nd 07, 05:05 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old(ish) scans - 14 - Short SD
"®i©ardo" wrote in message
.uk... Those flying sheds were brilliant! -- Moving things in still pictures! Once flew on one from Manchester to Northern Ireland (Belfast City IIRC), felt as though you were sitting only inches above the runway during take-off and it was a little noisy as we droned slowly along at 8,000ft. The view was quite good though. -- Andrew "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.)
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FAA: Runways come up short | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 10 | November 6th 06 02:06 AM |
Linear Mode
