![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks nice, but could suffer from some of the "Cirrus-like" links
between marketing and safety record. Still, if I had the money, it would be the ultimate ride. (as long as your kids don't want to ride along). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko1WY...elated&search= http://www.avtechgroup.com/ They've been talking about this thing for a while, but it would seem that there is only one flying..? --Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 May 2007 16:32:46 -0700, Dan wrote in
.com: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko1WY...elated&search= Truly awesome! Breathtaking! I hear Hayden "Jim" Sheaffer's* has a deposit down on one of those. Pilots like him shouldn't have any problem thinking ahead of an aircraft like the Javelin. :-) * http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...050523faa.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 May 2007 16:32:46 -0700, Dan wrote:
They've been talking about this thing for a while, but it would seem that there is only one flying..? Reminds me of a T-33. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B A R R Y" wrote in message ... On 5 May 2007 16:32:46 -0700, Dan wrote: They've been talking about this thing for a while, but it would seem that there is only one flying..? Reminds me of a T-33. Form does follow function, in this case, doesn't it? 2 engines, 2 seat, small, no need for heavy carry capability. Plop! There it is; almost like a T-33! -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 6 May 2007 08:41:56 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote: Form does follow function, in this case, doesn't it? 2 engines, 2 seat, small, no need for heavy carry capability. Plop! There it is; almost like a T-33! I meant some of the details, like the intakes, and the arches along the size. Lots of 2 seat jets with similar capability don't look like a T-33. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 May 2007 12:45:42 -0400, B A R R Y
wrote: I meant some of the details, like the intakes, and the arches along the size. Lots of 2 seat jets with similar capability don't look like a T-33. What a maroon I am... I was actually referring to the Javelin resembling a T-38, the trainer version of the F5. Hey, _I_ knew what I was talking about! G |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B A R R Y" wrote What a maroon I am... I was actually referring to the Javelin resembling a T-38, the trainer version of the F5. Hey, _I_ knew what I was talking about! G Yeah, I did too, and I wasn't even in your head! I didn't catch the mistake, either. Seriously though, given the project's mission, it is not surprising to me that it came out looking a lot like the T-38. There are not that many different ways you can arrange things, and make it perform as the designers intended. I'm sure they did a lot of, "well, what is out there, that does what we want to do, and does it look cool. It has to look cool!" -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
Looks nice, but could suffer from some of the "Cirrus-like" links between marketing and safety record. Still, if I had the money, it would be the ultimate ride. (as long as your kids don't want to ride along). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko1WY...elated&search= http://www.avtechgroup.com/ They've been talking about this thing for a while, but it would seem that there is only one flying..? --Dan What's the minimum length runway needed?? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 1:37 pm, Erik wrote:
Dan wrote: Looks nice, but could suffer from some of the "Cirrus-like" links between marketing and safety record. Still, if I had the money, it would be the ultimate ride. (as long as your kids don't want to ride along). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko1WY...elated&search= http://www.avtechgroup.com/ They've been talking about this thing for a while, but it would seem that there is only one flying..? --Dan What's the minimum length runway needed??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Technical features for the Javelin MK-10 Engines: Two - 1,700 pound thrust, turbo-fan Williams International FJ33-4A-17M Seating capacity: Two, tandem Max gross weight: 6,200 pounds Wing span: 23.25 feet Length: 36 feet Height: 10.5 feet Wing area: 120 square feet Take-off ground roll (std day, SL, 6,200 lb): 1,800 feet Balanced field (std day, SL, 6,200 lb): 3,000 feet Max rate of climb: 10,000 ft/min Time to climb to 41,000 ft (ISA, std day, 6,200 lb): 13 min. Cruise speed (ISA, std day, 5,500 lb, 35,000 ft): 0.90 Mach, 525 KTAS, 600 mph Stall speed in landing configuration (6,080 lb.): 110 KCAS Approach speed: 132 knots (at max gross weight) Approach speed: 114 knots (at landing weight) Landing distance (std day, SL, 6,080 lb, full flaps) Ground Roll: 2,200 feet Over 50 ft: 5,000 feet Landing Distance (std day, SL, 4,575 lb, full flaps) Ground Roll: 1,800 feet Over 50 ft: 4,200 feet IFR Range (M 0.80): 1,200 nm Endurance: 3.5 hours Fuel capacity: 280 gallons Fuel Consumption at mid-cruise weight Economy cruise (0.80 Mach at 45,000 ft): 75 gal/hr High-speed cruise (0.90 Mach at 35,000 ft) 109 gal/hr Certified ceiling: 45,000 feet Cargo/Baggage: up to 200 lb. Price 2005: $2.795 million (will be indexed, taxes not included) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Dan" wrote)
Technical features for the Javelin MK-10 http://www.viper-aircraft.com/ Check out these guys Forget the price, look at those build hours. Wow. Montblack |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My Dad's Avalon pics : ATG Javelin 2 | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 30th 07 10:11 AM |
How many Javelin Ford V6s actually flew/are flying? | Bret Ludwig | Home Built | 12 | October 10th 05 03:29 PM |