![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These include Ship-launched versions that use the rocket
motor and airframe from Evolved Sea Sparrow. Which basically makes it an Evolved Sea Sparrow with an AMRAAM seeker head. See: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...6-074eb6a1b82d |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 24, 12:35 am, Henry J Cobb wrote:
wrote: These include Ship-launched versions that use the rocket motor and airframe from Evolved Sea Sparrow. Which basically makes it an Evolved Sea Sparrow with an AMRAAM seeker head. See: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...plckController... Don't you have to delete the Medium Range term if you're not firing it from on high? ASAM I am. -HJC Since Evolved Sea Sparrow has a rang of approx 50km, (more than IHAWK or Standard SM-1) doesn't it qualify as an area-defense system now, as opposed to a point defense system? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 24, 9:02 am, wrote:
On Jul 24, 12:35 am, Henry J Cobb wrote: wrote: These include Ship-launched versions that use the rocket motor and airframe from Evolved Sea Sparrow. Which basically makes it an Evolved Sea Sparrow with an AMRAAMseeker head. See: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...plckController... Don't you have to delete the Medium Range term if you're not firing it from on high? ASAM I am. -HJC Since Evolved Sea Sparrow has a rang of approx 50km, (more than IHAWK or Standard SM-1) doesn't it qualify as an area-defense system now, as opposed to a point defense system? No one? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 23, 11:51 pm, wrote:
These include Ship-launched versions that use the rocket motor and airframe from Evolved Sea Sparrow. Which basically makes it an Evolved Sea Sparrow with an AMRAAM seeker head. See: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...plckController... Oh, that bottom photo withthe 4 + 4 launcher (4 AMRAAM and 4 Aim-9x) is just cool. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 11:12 pm, "David E. Powell"
wrote: On Jul 23, 11:51 pm, wrote: These include Ship-launched versions that use the rocket motor and airframe from Evolved Sea Sparrow. Which basically makes it an Evolved Sea Sparrow with an AMRAAM seeker head. See: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...plckController... Oh, that bottom photo withthe 4 + 4 launcher (4 AMRAAM and 4 Aim-9x) is just cool. Actually, that launcher has only 2 AIM-9X. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
in case you have seen similar versions of this use this one its safe | vamuse | Home Built | 1 | February 12th 05 01:54 AM |
Older versions of X-plane | Fred the Red Shirt | Simulators | 0 | March 20th 04 09:23 PM |
Quick guide to the F-35 JSF versions. | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 70 | March 2nd 04 09:33 PM |
Difference Between FS2002 Pro vs. the Standard Versions? | Bill Wolff | Simulators | 4 | January 12th 04 03:26 AM |
FS2004 Compatibility with Previous Versions? | Peter Greenstein | Simulators | 7 | July 5th 03 11:30 PM |