![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The other night I was on an airline flight...
The weather was VFR. The plane did a low approach, wheels maybe 50' above the runway, and about halfway down the runway kicked the engines on and did a go around. The pilot came on and indicated that there was "an indicator light" that caused them to abort the landing, but that it had been reset and the plane is OK now. When we landed on the next approach, they had the equipment rolling - 4 or 5 Fire Engines, a couple of police cars, and two yellow-strobed Port Authority vehicles. The landing was uneventful, and the fire trucks went back in, but a police car and a PA vehicle followed us all the way to the gate. Based on the low approach, I initially assumed the indicator light was a gear indicator. But would they roll equipment on a second attempt if the indicator was cleared? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Judah wrote: The other night I was on an airline flight... The weather was VFR. The plane did a low approach, wheels maybe 50' above the runway, and about halfway down the runway kicked the engines on and did a go around. The pilot came on and indicated that there was "an indicator light" that caused them to abort the landing, but that it had been reset and the plane is OK now. When we landed on the next approach, they had the equipment rolling - 4 or 5 Fire Engines, a couple of police cars, and two yellow-strobed Port Authority vehicles. The landing was uneventful, and the fire trucks went back in, but a police car and a PA vehicle followed us all the way to the gate. Based on the low approach, I initially assumed the indicator light was a gear indicator. But would they roll equipment on a second attempt if the indicator was cleared? Because they would look like idiots if anything bad happened and they hadn't rolled the equipment. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy,
Because they would look like idiots if anything bad happened and they hadn't rolled the equipment. Exactly. I landed with a failed alternator once and they rolled it just to make sure I wasn't going to burst into flames or something. One of the firemen then directed us into our parking spot... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah wrote:
The other night I was on an airline flight... The necessary response time if the CFR is going to be effective is on the tune of 30 seconds. They will take the advantage of any advance notice to get out in position if there is any even slight possibility that they would be required. I've seen them roll the equipment on a number of situations like overtemp on APU's, etc.. I even had the ANG CFR brigade get called out after me after reporting an burnt electrical smell on a return to landing after maintenance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Natalie" wrote The necessary response time if the CFR is going to be effective is on the tune of 30 seconds. They will take the advantage of any advance notice to get out in position if there is any even slight possibility that they would be required. Besides that, they sit on their butts, most of the time that they are not training or maintaining equipment. They probably look forward to be called out, (and hope they are not really needed) to keep the boredom level down. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 19, 2:53 am, Thomas Borchert
wrote: Roy, Because they would look like idiots if anything bad happened and they hadn't rolled the equipment. Exactly. I landed with a failed alternator once and they rolled it just to make sure I wasn't going to burst into flames or something. One of the firemen then directed us into our parking spot... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) My wife would like that... she likes firefighters. I just don't let her take any home with her... Dean |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Morgans" wrote)
Besides that, they sit on their butts, most of the time that they are not training or maintaining equipment. Which is why I was astonished to hear that one of the firetrucks "didn't work" at OSH this year - when it was needed. Anyone have an update to this scuttle"butt"? Paul-Mont (From the web) Scuttlebutt in nautical terminology is a water fountain or water cask on a ship. It is now more commonly used as slang for "information" or "gossip". "Water for immediate consumption on a sailing ship was conventionally stored in a scuttled butt: a butt (cask or small barrel) which had been scuttled by making a hole in it so the water could be withdrawn. Since sailors exchanged gossip when they gathered at the scuttlebutt for a drink of water, scuttlebutt became U.S. Navy slang for gossip or rumors." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 2 - the C17 [14/14] - "14 C17 rolling in.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 30th 07 10:48 PM |
Today in Oshkosh [4/9] - "04 U2 rolling out.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 27th 07 01:49 AM |
Today at Oshkosh [03/34] - "02 C130 rolling out.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 25th 07 04:31 AM |
"Rolling" to ATC | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 135 | February 10th 07 02:42 AM |
"The Effects of Leadership on Carrier Air Wing Sixteen's Loss Rates during Operation Rolling Thunder, 1965-1968" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 12th 06 01:37 PM |