![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've flown several times on Midwest Airlines' Boeing 717 aircraft, and
recently two things happened that I never experienced and hope a pilot might explain. First, about an hour into the flight I smelled what seemed like jet engine exhaust. That lasted for about 10 minutes. The other was really strange (at least to me). About 30 minutes later, the First Officer exited the cockpit and walked the length of the cabin with his arms outstretched, hands running along the overhead compartments. Then he walked back and re-entered the cockpit; when the door opened I saw that a flight attendant was waiting inside. He went in; she came out. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flight Attendant: "No, really - the plane gets narrower the further you go
back". First Officer" "It does not. I'll bet you a dollar it's the same front to back. Flight Attendant" "OK - you go check, and I'll look after your stuff up here". "Jed" wrote in message ... I've flown several times on Midwest Airlines' Boeing 717 aircraft, and recently two things happened that I never experienced and hope a pilot might explain. First, about an hour into the flight I smelled what seemed like jet engine exhaust. That lasted for about 10 minutes. The other was really strange (at least to me). About 30 minutes later, the First Officer exited the cockpit and walked the length of the cabin with his arms outstretched, hands running along the overhead compartments. Then he walked back and re-entered the cockpit; when the door opened I saw that a flight attendant was waiting inside. He went in; she came out. Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, I knew I opened the door when I asked this.
Flight Attendant: "No, really - the plane gets narrower the further you go back". First Officer" "It does not. I'll bet you a dollar it's the same front to back. Flight Attendant" "OK - you go check, and I'll look after your stuff up here". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Jed" wrote:
First Officer exited the cockpit and walked the length of the cabin with his arms outstretched, hands running along the overhead compartments. Putting your hands on the overhead compartments means you don't have to put your hands on every single seatback on the way up and down the aisle. Don't you just love it when the gomer behind you has to grab and pull on your seatback? -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 7:12 am, Bob Noel
wrote: In article , "Jed" wrote: First Officer exited the cockpit and walked the length of the cabin with his arms outstretched, hands running along the overhead compartments. Putting your hands on the overhead compartments means you don't have to put your hands on every single seatback on the way up and down the aisle. That's usually what I do. Seems to work ok for balance when the plane starts to hit some garbage. Some folks aren't aware or just don't seem to care about their surroundings as they waddle up/down the aisle. Don't you just love it when the gomer behind you has to grab and pull on your seatback? Indeed. Especially on a long flight when you're trying to grab some shuteye. Too bad there isn't a device analagous to noise-canceling phones that work well dealing with loud babies during trans-oceanic flights, that would cancel vibrations ![]() Then there's the large farm animal in the seat in front that decides to dump their seat back into your kneecaps when you're working on dinner or the laptop. I saw a show on PBS a while back where they went back to through the history of commercial aviation in the US. International airlines do a much better job in providing a better overall comfort package these days; but I was amazed to see how much of a comfort it used to be to fly in the US in the early days. They showed passengers eating actual meals (a real cut of steak). Now they're even cutting out the complimentary "meals" on many flights (under 5 hours, IIRC?). Guess the bailout didn't quite cover the margin and now we're the cattle sigh... Even as recently as back in '98 or so, on a 1-hour morning leg from Sydney to Brisbane on Ansett, they served a real muffin. Yeah, ok, Ansett's no longer, but I doubt it was correllated to the oversized muffin ![]() On any coast-to-coast or longer flight, I make sure I'm stocked with supplies, just to make the ride tolerable. Call me eclectic, but grazing on the third pack of mini-pretzels starts to get a little old ![]() I checked on http://www.acela.com and the Boston to DC Express run is around 6.5 hours for a little over $200. And it's only that long due to the fact that they can't sustain 150mph the whole way. Of course there are stops along the way, but the main impediment is track restrictions. Between waiting at the airport, taxi in/out times, what used to be a 1-hour ride checks in closer to 3 these days. If Acela could get that ride down to around = 4 hours (time is only part of the package for me), and airline delays continue, rail mode would be a winner for me. Just curious, how long does it nominally take the little guys (say a Piper or something that can make it w/o having to re-fuel) to get from BOS to DCA, assuming weather isn't an issue? -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) Regards, Jon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon wrote in
ups.com: Then there's the large farm animal in the seat in front that decides to dump their seat back into your kneecaps when you're working on dinner or the laptop. Fortunately, I think the airlines have reduced the recline of the seats so that it only goes back about an inch... I checked on http://www.acela.com and the Boston to DC Express run is around 6.5 hours for a little over $200. And it's only that long due to the fact that they can't sustain 150mph the whole way. Of course there are stops along the way, but the main impediment is track They go 150mph for a surprisingly short amount of time. I believe it's through the south end of Rhode Island, and lasts about 15 minutes. I haven't done that ride in a while, but that's about what it used to be. Just curious, how long does it nominally take the little guys (say a Piper or something that can make it w/o having to re-fuel) to get from BOS to DCA, assuming weather isn't an issue? From BOS to DCA is about 350nm. In an Archer @ ~115kts, that would be just over 3 hours. However, a direct flight would take you through NYC and Philly airspace, which could add time. Wind is also a factor. In a Bonanza @~ 170kts you'll save almost an hour and arrive in just over 2 hours. I wouldn't land BOS or DCA in an Archer or a Bo, though. I don't think Logan is very GA friendly, and there are airports nearby to choose from that are much more GA friendly (I used to land OWD quite a bit a few years back). DCA is very restricted since 9/11. I don't think GA aircraft are allowed to land there at all anymore, and pilots need special clearance in order to land at any of the three nearest public airports. I think the nearest usable airport now is probably Freeway in Bowie, and it has a fairly short runway, though... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon" wrote in message ups.com... Just curious, how long does it nominally take the little guys (say a Piper or something that can make it w/o having to re-fuel) to get from BOS to DCA, assuming weather isn't an issue? That "weather thing" would be a big assumption. Even if pilot and plane are instrument rated (many are not) the traveling schedule of your average "Piper or something" is very vulnerable to bad weather. More than one pilot-traveler has abandoned an airplane and taken the airlines home to wait for better weather to return and fetch the family airplane. I am an enthusiastic pilot, but realize that light airplanes do not make good travel tools unless you have significant flexibility in your schedule and are willing to change your plans in the interest of safety. Vaughn |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vaughn Simon wrote:
Just curious, how long does it nominally take the little guys (say a Piper or something that can make it w/o having to re-fuel) to get from BOS to DCA, assuming weather isn't an issue? That "weather thing" would be a big assumption. Even if pilot and plane are instrument rated (many are not) the traveling schedule of your average "Piper or something" is very vulnerable to bad weather. More than one pilot-traveler has abandoned an airplane and taken the airlines home to wait for better weather to return and fetch the family airplane. I am an enthusiastic pilot, but realize that light airplanes do not make good travel tools unless you have significant flexibility in your schedule and are willing to change your plans in the interest of safety. WTH? There are plenty of days where it's safe to fly relatively long distances VFR. The only caveat is that it's one of those deals where the ultimate go/no go decision is going to have to be the same day just before you take off (assuming you do). Now I understand that the ultimate go/ no go is done then on every flight but my point is that an IFR rated pilot is able to plan with an excellent chance of mission completion days ahead while a VFR only pilot really can't. Now to answer the other gentlemen's question: it depends on the aircraft. A C-210 could make the trip in just a couple of hours (I'm estimating... I made a nonstop from Rock Hill, SC to Beverly, MA once in a 210 on one tank of gas some years ago so the Washington to Boston leg must have been 2 hours or so. In a C-172 or Warrior, I would guess closer to three or three and a half hours. Certainly something doable on a pretty day on the Eastern seaboard. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 1:02 pm, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com
wrote: Vaughn Simon wrote: Just curious, how long does it nominally take the little guys (say a Piper or something that can make it w/o having to re-fuel) to get from BOS to DCA, assuming weather isn't an issue? That "weather thing" would be a big assumption. Even if pilot and plane are instrument rated (many are not) the traveling schedule of your average "Piper or something" is very vulnerable to bad weather. Understood that weather up in these parts is often a factor. I was looking for a best case time. [good datapoints snipped for brevity] Now to answer the other gentlemen's question: it depends on the aircraft. A C-210 could make the trip in just a couple of hours (I'm estimating... I made a nonstop from Rock Hill, SC to Beverly, MA once in a 210 on one tank of gas some years ago so the Washington to Boston leg must have been 2 hours or so. In a C-172 or Warrior, I would guess closer to three or three and a half hours. Certainly something doable on a pretty day on the Eastern seaboard. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com Thanks Judah, Vaughn, and Mortimer for the info. The reason I asked was that there was some talk a few years back about the whether it would be feasible for work to go with their own shuttle option (lease? rent?). On a typical day, I imagine there's at least half a dozen or more that take the USAir shuttle to DCA and United to IAD, so I'm revisiting the concept. Just given the numbers of trips, there's usually at least a couple horror stories about delays for a variety of reasons, not always weather related. That and the cost of .gov fare are not at all competitive given we usually have no choice but to fly on the contract carriers. The Tech Center has a shuttle to/from IAD-ACY which I've taken a few times when work takes me there. Not sure what type of plane it is, but I wanna say it's around a 40 seater and they run two daily trips each way. It's loaded up in the cockpit for bad weather ("Weatherscope", as I recall), and I was thinking something along those lines (or smaller) would be good for helping with marginal weather days. Regards, Jon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Vaughn Simon wrote: Just curious, how long does it nominally take the little guys (say a Piper or something that can make it w/o having to re-fuel) to get from BOS to DCA, assuming weather isn't an issue? That "weather thing" would be a big assumption. Even if pilot and plane are instrument rated (many are not) the traveling schedule of your average "Piper or something" is very vulnerable to bad weather. More than one pilot-traveler has abandoned an airplane and taken the airlines home to wait for better weather to return and fetch the family airplane. I am an enthusiastic pilot, but realize that light airplanes do not make good travel tools unless you have significant flexibility in your schedule and are willing to change your plans in the interest of safety. WTH? There are plenty of days where it's safe to fly relatively long distances VFR. The only caveat is that it's one of those deals where the ultimate go/no go decision is going to have to be the same day just before you take off (assuming you do). Now I understand that the ultimate go/ no go is done then on every flight but my point is that an IFR rated pilot is able to plan with an excellent chance of mission completion days ahead while a VFR only pilot really can't. We did that trip recently (Culpeper, VA to OWD) in less then 3 hours and on the way home we went ORD to Lancaster, PA where we put down and rented a car (2 hour drive home) due to T-storms. The next weekend we went back to Lancaster to get the plane. We probably still beat the airline times even driving the last 100 miles :-). Margy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flight level questions | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 14th 06 09:13 PM |
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | November 23rd 05 10:31 PM |
Nice Surprize During Pre Flight, And A Few Odd Questions | MRQB | Owning | 12 | March 24th 04 11:26 PM |
IFR flight in MSFS '98 questions | Sydney Hoeltzli | Simulators | 9 | July 31st 03 12:05 AM |
A few questions about Flight Sims and equipment | Dave Pearson | Simulators | 0 | July 29th 03 09:05 AM |