![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Contrary to what most of the non-technical idiots in FAA
management think, facilities are important for Air Safety Systems to check for a dangerous weather condition were faulty at the time of Sunday's devastating air crash at Phuket airport, Thai officials say. Some of the airport's wind shear alert systems were not working properly, said aviation official Vutichai Singhamany. Investigators have said wind shear - a sudden change in either wind speed or direction - was among the possible causes of the crash. Officials in Phuket are still working to identify the victims of the crash.At least 89 people were killed when the plane, operated by budget airline One-Two-Go, skidded off the runway.Many foreigners were on the flight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7000919.stm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WhoGivesAFig? wrote in news:x_RHi.25$W76.19
@newsfe12.lga: Contrary to what most of the non-technical idiots in FAA management think, facilities are important for Air Safety Systems to check for a dangerous weather condition were faulty at the time of Sunday's devastating air crash at Phuket airport, Thai officials say. Some of the airport's wind shear alert systems were not working properly, said aviation official Vutichai Singhamany. Investigators have said wind shear - a sudden change in either wind speed or direction - was among the possible causes of the crash. Officials in Phuket are still working to identify the victims of the crash.At least 89 people were killed when the plane, operated by budget airline One-Two-Go, skidded off the runway.Many foreigners were on the flight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7000919.stm So, you're taking a possibility and offring it up as a fact to support an opinion. Ecver thought of a job at Fox news? Or maybe the Bush administration? Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WhoGivesAFig? wrote in news:x_RHi.25$W76.19 @newsfe12.lga: Contrary to what most of the non-technical idiots in FAA management think, facilities are important for Air Safety Systems to check for a dangerous weather condition were faulty at the time of Sunday's devastating air crash at Phuket airport, Thai officials say. Some of the airport's wind shear alert systems were not working properly, said aviation official Vutichai Singhamany. Investigators have said wind shear - a sudden change in either wind speed or direction - was among the possible causes of the crash. Officials in Phuket are still working to identify the victims of the crash.At least 89 people were killed when the plane, operated by budget airline One-Two-Go, skidded off the runway.Many foreigners were on the flight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7000919.stm So, you're taking a possibility and offring it up as a fact to support an opinion. Ecver thought of a job at Fox news? Or maybe the Bush administration? Bertie FACT-FAA Management is not technical or qualified only politically correct Vagina's FACT-The aircraft was landing in high winds FACT-Passengers reported the aircraft "going up and down" on approach. That is consistent with wind shear FACT-The aircraft was on it's second landing attempt I would say wind shear and lack of good weather information by the pilot and controllers is a good possibility |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WhoGivesAFig? wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: WhoGivesAFig? wrote in news:x_RHi.25$W76.19 @newsfe12.lga: Contrary to what most of the non-technical idiots in FAA management think, facilities are important for Air Safety Systems to check for a dangerous weather condition were faulty at the time of Sunday's devastating air crash at Phuket airport, Thai officials say. Some of the airport's wind shear alert systems were not working properly, said aviation official Vutichai Singhamany. Investigators have said wind shear - a sudden change in either wind speed or direction - was among the possible causes of the crash. Officials in Phuket are still working to identify the victims of the crash.At least 89 people were killed when the plane, operated by budget airline One-Two-Go, skidded off the runway.Many foreigners were on the flight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7000919.stm So, you're taking a possibility and offring it up as a fact to support an opinion. Ecver thought of a job at Fox news? Or maybe the Bush administration? Bertie FACT-FAA Management is not technical or qualified only politically correct Vagina's FACT-The aircraft was landing in high winds FACT-Passengers reported the aircraft "going up and down" on approach. That is consistent with wind shear FACT-The aircraft was on it's second landing attempt I would say wind shear and lack of good weather information by the pilot and controllers is a good possibility Probably, but you are jumping the gun and using the possibility as a crutch to suport your own agenda. In any case, the crew were advised of the presence of windshear, and would have known it was present anyway, as it always is undr those conditions. Fjukkwit. Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, WhoGivesAFig? posted:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: WhoGivesAFig? wrote in news:x_RHi.25$W76.19 @newsfe12.lga: Contrary to what most of the non-technical idiots in FAA management think, facilities are important for Air Safety Systems to check for a dangerous weather condition were faulty at the time of Sunday's devastating air crash at Phuket airport, Thai officials say. Some of the airport's wind shear alert systems were not working properly, said aviation official Vutichai Singhamany. Investigators have said wind shear - a sudden change in either wind speed or direction - was among the possible causes of the crash. Officials in Phuket are still working to identify the victims of the crash.At least 89 people were killed when the plane, operated by budget airline One-Two-Go, skidded off the runway.Many foreigners were on the flight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7000919.stm So, you're taking a possibility and offring it up as a fact to support an opinion. Ecver thought of a job at Fox news? Or maybe the Bush administration? Bertie FACT-FAA Management is not technical or qualified only politically correct Vagina's FACT-The aircraft was landing in high winds FACT-Passengers reported the aircraft "going up and down" on approach. That is consistent with wind shear FACT-The aircraft was on it's second landing attempt FACT - The FAA doesn't have any influence over Thai air operations. FACT - You are clueless to this fact, and therefore your entire premise is only valid inside your head. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars Hit The Road in the USA | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 06 03:48 AM |
Electronic Facilities and Airport Directory (eFAD) | PS | Products | 4 | September 8th 05 05:02 PM |
Zimbabwe gliding facilities ? | not@top-post | Soaring | 6 | September 28th 04 05:22 AM |
MLS Airports facilities | Gustavo Guido | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | September 16th 04 06:46 PM |
fire at Schleicher factory facilities | Eric van Geetsum | Soaring | 7 | July 24th 03 04:56 AM |