Logistics Air Force Partnering

In article ,
says...
I'm looking for this kind of collaboration in USA on the web,
I've found a lot of information about other partnering, but nothing
about this one.


Have you considered asking in rec.aviation.military ?

This group deals mainly with US Army maners...

--

You're right,
I'm sorry.


Not meant to drive you away it is just that those with the expertizee will
be found there.

Good luck with the search.


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...

Good luck with the search.

I thought us.army.mil had a no crossposting fettish.

Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:58:39 -0700, a stranger
called by some "Tarver Engineering" came forth and
told this tale in us.military.army


"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
nk.net...

Good luck with the search.

I thought us.army.mil had a no crossposting fettish.

Not off-topic groups or to more than three total is what's in the
charter, IIRC.

2 groups, and they both relate to the military.

--

Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail

WE *ARE* UMA
Lemmings 404 Local

"Douglas Berry" wrote in message
...
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:58:39 -0700, a stranger
called by some "Tarver Engineering" came forth and
told this tale in us.military.army


"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
nk.net...

Good luck with the search.

I thought us.army.mil had a no crossposting fettish.

Not off-topic groups or to more than three total is what's in the
charter, IIRC.

2 groups, and they both relate to the military.

It has not been so long ago that us.army.mil was asking to be left out of
crossposts from ram. Do not pull the netcop stunt again, now that your
users are initiating the contact.

In article , says...

"Douglas Berry" wrote in message
...
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:58:39 -0700, a stranger
called by some "Tarver Engineering" came forth and
told this tale in us.military.army


"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
nk.net...

Good luck with the search.

I thought us.army.mil had a no crossposting fettish.

Not off-topic groups or to more than three total is what's in the
charter, IIRC.

2 groups, and they both relate to the military.

It has not been so long ago that us.army.mil was asking to be left out of
crossposts from ram. Do not pull the netcop stunt again, now that your
users are initiating the contact.

I pointed the person asking the question to the group most relevant.

us.army.mil is NOT a newsgroup fool.

The newsgroup is us.military.army

And who was asking that us.military.army be left out ?

And where was he netcopping ?
You seemed to be the one tryiing to..



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:45:12 -0700, Tarver Engineering wrote:

Not off-topic groups or to more than three total is what's in the
charter, IIRC.

2 groups, and they both relate to the military.

It has not been so long ago that us.army.mil was asking to be left out of
crossposts from ram. Do not pull the netcop stunt again, now that your
users are initiating the contact.

Sheesh, take a pill and calm down. Also, asking to be left out of
crossposts and netcopping are two different things last I checked.

Besides, it depends on what the crossposting is about. If it's only about
aircraft then it's probably off-topic for uma. If it's only about the Army then
it's probably off-topic for ram.

Dave
--
You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us!
US Army Signal Corps!!

www.geocities.com/davidcasey98
Added Patriot live fire pics from June 2002,
Bosque fire pics from June 2003, CQB training
pics from October 2003, FTX pics from October 2000,
NBC training pics from September 2000, and
Dining Out pics from October 2000!

"David Casey" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:45:12 -0700, Tarver Engineering wrote:

Not off-topic groups or to more than three total is what's in the
charter, IIRC.

2 groups, and they both relate to the military.

It has not been so long ago that us.army.mil was asking to be left out
of
crossposts from ram. Do not pull the netcop stunt again, now that your
users are initiating the contact.

Sheesh, take a pill and calm down. Also, asking to be left out of
crossposts and netcopping are two different things last I checked.

You boys went luney last time.

Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:45:12 -0700, a stranger
called by some "Tarver Engineering" came forth and
told this tale in us.military.army

It has not been so long ago that us.army.mil was asking to be left out of
crossposts from ram. Do not pull the netcop stunt again, now that your
users are initiating the contact.

Take the stick out of your ass, and understand that I will continue to
act as I feel necessary.

"Tarver Engineering" I remember you! Still a nutcase these days?
--

Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail

WE *ARE* UMA
Lemmings 404 Local

"Douglas Berry" wrote in message
...
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:45:12 -0700, a stranger
called by some "Tarver Engineering" came forth and
told this tale in us.military.army

It has not been so long ago that us.army.mil was asking to be left out of
crossposts from ram. Do not pull the netcop stunt again, now that your
users are initiating the contact.

Take the stick out of your ass, and understand that I will continue to
act as I feel necessary.

Go fetch the stick ...

In article , says...

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...

Good luck with the search.

I thought us.army.mil had a no crossposting fettish.


Stop thinking then.

That's my email son.




--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.