![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are
for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe AIM 1-1-19.4.f will help.
CareBear "Newps" wrote in message . .. Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the GPS unit's AOM or Pilots Guide.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:03:38 -0600, "CareBear" wrote: Maybe AIM 1-1-19.4.f will help. CareBear "Newps" wrote in message ... Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need the FAR or Advisory Circular that covers this. The AIM is
actually the root of the problem. I believe it to be wrong and isn't the legal basis anyways. CareBear wrote: Maybe AIM 1-1-19.4.f will help. CareBear "Newps" wrote in message . .. Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My KLN 94 has a POH supplement that states the Pilots Guide is
incorporated by reference. The KLN94 Pilots Guide Part Number 006-18207-0000 page 2-4 states "Note: By FAA regulation, you are required to have a current navigation database in order to use the KLN 94 for a non-precision approach." Since the POH is required to be adhered to, and the Pilot's Guide is incorporated by reference, it would seem to be the legal basis mandataing a current database for any non-ILS approach with that unit. It would have been nice of them to footnote what FAA regulation they're referring to when they say that one requires a current navigation database. Perhaps emailing Bendix/King and enquiring would get them to send you the reference? On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:49:41 -0700, Newps wrote: I need the FAR or Advisory Circular that covers this. The AIM is actually the root of the problem. I believe it to be wrong and isn't the legal basis anyways. CareBear wrote: Maybe AIM 1-1-19.4.f will help. CareBear "Newps" wrote in message . .. Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Clark wrote: My KLN 94 has a POH supplement that states the Pilots Guide is incorporated by reference. The KLN94 Pilots Guide Part Number 006-18207-0000 page 2-4 states "Note: By FAA regulation, you are required to have a current navigation database in order to use the KLN 94 for a non-precision approach." OK there's no argument on that point. The difference we are having is a terminal/enroute box that you don't shoot approaches with, such as the GX55 in my plane. It can legally substitute for ADF/DME but some folks are saying that the database is required to be current. My box is one that says the user must verify waypoints if the database is expired. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 3, 9:15 pm, Newps wrote:
OK there's no argument on that point. The difference we are having is a terminal/enroute box that you don't shoot approaches with, such as the GX55 in my plane. It can legally substitute for ADF/DME but some folks are saying that the database is required to be current. My box is one that says the user must verify waypoints if the database is expired. Newps, this is a great question. At work we are allowed to MEL the database provided we verify the waypoints (And our box is certified for RNP) , but for part 91, I doubt you have an MEL. This creates a grey area and I dont think the feds would give you a consistent answer. If your manual says it is OK just do it. In the older Boeings there was a requierment for one of the pilots to be in raw data by the FAF so we would dial in the NDB but of course we used the box to fly the course. Nobody could argue with that because we were legal and safe. So just dial in the NDB and use the box for a "Backup" and you will be fine. FB |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote in
: Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. Our's come with expiry dates on the database renewals themselves. When you are within those dates, you're legal and hopefully safe, if you've read the notams, of course. Bertie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AC90-100a Para 10.a.3
(3) The onboard navigation data must be current and appropriate for the region of intended operation and must include the navigation aids, waypoints, and relevant coded terminal airspace procedures for the departure, arrival, and alternate airfields. RNAV STAR procedures may be designed using multiple runway transitions. Operators not having this functionality shall provide an acceptable alternative means (for example, a tailored navigation data base). If no equivalent means are available to fly the charted RNAV procedure containing multiple runway transitions, operators will not file or accept clearance for these procedures. "Newps" wrote in message . .. Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dang.. I get message's that the newsgroup server is not responding.. and
then it posts 4 times.. sorry.. BT "BT" wrote in message ... AC90-100a Para 10.a.3 (3) The onboard navigation data must be current and appropriate for the region of intended operation and must include the navigation aids, waypoints, and relevant coded terminal airspace procedures for the departure, arrival, and alternate airfields. RNAV STAR procedures may be designed using multiple runway transitions. Operators not having this functionality shall provide an acceptable alternative means (for example, a tailored navigation data base). If no equivalent means are available to fly the charted RNAV procedure containing multiple runway transitions, operators will not file or accept clearance for these procedures. "Newps" wrote in message . .. Anybody have the link to the FAR that states what the requirements are for IFR approved GPS's and the database currency for those units. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|