VC-25A synthetic Vision

I believe this is the one:

http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...e=1&imageNum=2

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 11/29/2003 11:57 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

I believe this is the one:


http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...cat=comsys&sub
cat=&page=1&imageNum=2

Congratulations, tarver, you almost provided independant proof of one of your
claims for the very first time in your life.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 11/29/2003 11:57 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

I believe this is the one:


http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...cat=comsys&sub
cat=&page=1&imageNum=2

Congratulations, tarver, you almost provided independant proof of one of
your
claims for the very first time in your life.

It is only for you non-technical types, Dan. Most at ram could have typed
"synthetic vision" into a search engine themselves.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 11/29/2003 12:31 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 11/29/2003 11:57 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

I believe this is the one:


http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...cat=comsys&sub
cat=&page=1&imageNum=2

Congratulations, tarver, you almost provided independant proof of one of
your
claims for the very first time in your life.

It is only for you non-technical types, Dan. Most at ram could have typed
"synthetic vision" into a search engine themselves.

It was sarcasm, tarver. You still haven't backed up your statement about it
being on AF1 and when asked to cite a source you said "me" which means nothing
to anyone but you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...

snip
It was sarcasm, tarver. You still haven't backed up your statement about
it
being on AF1 and when asked to cite a source you said "me" which means
nothing
to anyone but you.

Your medical retirment from the USAF was for what, Dan?

From: "Tarver Engineering"

snip

Your medical retirment from the USAF was for what, Dan?


I didn't get a medical retirement.

Try to keep on subject. I know it's very hard for you to do, but I bet you can
if you try very hard.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
I believe this is the one:


http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...e=1&imageNum=2

Air Force 1 also carries AMRAAM.....Check it out, here's my proof..

http://www.raytheon.com/products/amraam/

"Brian" wrote in message
.. .

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
I believe this is the one:



http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...e=1&imageNum=2

Air Force 1 also carries AMRAAM.....Check it out, here's my proof..

http://www.raytheon.com/products/amraam/

Sorry to have stirred up your troll self, Brian.

My URL was not offered as proof, only as what is on the airplane, for those
interested.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 11/30/2003 12:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Brian" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
I believe this is the one:




http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...cat=comsys&sub
cat=&page=1&imageNum=2

Air Force 1 also carries AMRAAM.....Check it out, here's my proof..

http://www.raytheon.com/products/amraam/

Sorry to have stirred up your troll self, Brian.

My URL was not offered as proof, only as what is on the airplane, for those
interested.

Tarver, clarity is a must. You just said your link wasn't proof and that it was
proof all in one sentence.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 11/30/2003 12:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Brian" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
I believe this is the one:




http://www.rockwellcollins.com/newsr...cat=comsys&sub
cat=&page=1&imageNum=2

Air Force 1 also carries AMRAAM.....Check it out, here's my proof..

http://www.raytheon.com/products/amraam/

Sorry to have stirred up your troll self, Brian.

My URL was not offered as proof, only as what is on the airplane, for
those
interested.

Tarver, clarity is a must. You just said your link wasn't proof and that
it was
proof all in one sentence.

Nope.