A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Kittyhawk



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 15th 07, 12:00 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Glenn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,087
Default Kittyhawk


Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ZK-RMH-1 copy.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	144.7 KB
ID:	20526  
  #2  
Old December 15th 07, 02:15 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Tom Callahan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 362
Default Kittyhawk

Why the Subject line Kittyhawk? Isn't this a Tomahawk P-47? Tom in
Pensacola


"Glenn" wrote in message
...



  #3  
Old December 15th 07, 02:26 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Anyolmouse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default Kittyhawk


"Tom Callahan" wrote in
message ...
| Why the Subject line Kittyhawk? Isn't this a Tomahawk P-47? Tom in
| Pensacola
|
|
| "Glenn" wrote in message
| ...
|

I think it was Kittyhawk and Tomahawk for the British Commonwealth.
Warhawk was the US version. All were known as P-40. See he
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_P-40 and he
http://www.p40warhawk.com/ . Also:
http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero...curtissp40.htm

--
Anyolmouse


---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups
  #4  
Old December 15th 07, 03:06 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Tom Callahan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 362
Default Kittyhawk

Thanks. Don't know why I typed P-47 and not P-40. Oh, wait.....I know....I
can't type, Tom


"Anyolmouse" wrote in message
...

"Tom Callahan" wrote in
message ...
| Why the Subject line Kittyhawk? Isn't this a Tomahawk P-47? Tom in
| Pensacola
|
|
| "Glenn" wrote in message
| ...
|

I think it was Kittyhawk and Tomahawk for the British Commonwealth.
Warhawk was the US version. All were known as P-40. See he
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_P-40 and he
http://www.p40warhawk.com/ . Also:
http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero...curtissp40.htm

--
Anyolmouse


---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News
Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to
100,000+ newsgroups



  #5  
Old December 15th 07, 06:06 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Anyolmouse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default Kittyhawk

I have been a "Hunt and Pecker" typist all my life. If I didn't proof
read everything several times I would have more errors in my posts.
Spell checker helps too.

--
Anyolmouse

"Tom Callahan" wrote in
message ...
| Thanks. Don't know why I typed P-47 and not P-40. Oh, wait.....I
know....I
| can't type, Tom
|
|
| "Anyolmouse" wrote in message
| ...
|
| "Tom Callahan" wrote in
| message ...
| | Why the Subject line Kittyhawk? Isn't this a Tomahawk P-47? Tom
in
| | Pensacola
| |
| |
| | "Glenn" wrote in message
| | ...
| |
|
| I think it was Kittyhawk and Tomahawk for the British Commonwealth.
| Warhawk was the US version. All were known as P-40. See he
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_P-40 and he
| http://www.p40warhawk.com/ . Also:
| http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero...curtissp40.htm
|
| --
| Anyolmouse
|
|
| ---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News
| Provider ----
| http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to
| 100,000+ newsgroups
|
|
|
|

---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups
  #6  
Old December 16th 07, 12:00 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Chris D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default Kittyhawk

"Anyolmouse" wrote in message
...

"Tom Callahan" wrote in
message ...
| Why the Subject line Kittyhawk? Isn't this a Tomahawk P-47? Tom in
| Pensacola
|
|
| "Glenn" wrote in message
| ...
|

I think it was Kittyhawk and Tomahawk for the British Commonwealth.
Warhawk was the US version. All were known as P-40. See he
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_P-40 and he
http://www.p40warhawk.com/ . Also:
http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero...curtissp40.htm

--


My grandfather's younger brother was an aircraft mechanic on the Kittyhawk
during the war in the Pacific. He always spoke very fondly of these
aircraft. Shortly before he died, he was very sick and had trouble
remembering people and recent events. But when you asked him about the
Kittyhawk, he would become very switch on and could go into great detail
about the Kittyhawks maintenance procedures and his squadron colleagues
during the war.

I like this comment in wikipedia by former Prime Minister John Gorton on the
Kittyhawk;

John Gorton: RAAF, later Prime Minister of Australia, 1968-71. (Gorton
survived two serious crashes. One required him to undergo extensive plastic
surgery, with his face being changed significantly as a result. When asked
in later life what his most memorable flight had been, Gorton replied: "The
one in which I got my face mixed up with the instrument panel of a
Kittyhawk.")


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kittyhawk Glenn[_2_] Aviation Photos 2 July 8th 07 07:11 PM
Kittyhawk Glenn[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 March 15th 07 08:07 AM
Kittyhawk? Ian McKellan Military Aviation 4 December 31st 03 08:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.