![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it would even help, if instructors could use
an AoA displaying device to show learning pilots what's happening to the AoA during all kinds of different flight regimes and situations. That would give the unique option to show, that the AoA is the basic counting variable regarding a stall and how that critical AoA could be hit (as you can hit it in different ways)I don't see such a device installed in every common glider in the future. But it might be quite beneficial to have one in a training double seater to bring the Concept of AoA to the learners attention and into his mind. Anybody should get the idea then, just as in 'Rudder and Stick' getting the idea of AoA is the whole point. From that point on, I don't think a permanent display is neccessary any more. I'd think training is better that any display can be and being in severe and urgent trouble, a display, be it visual or audible, might not get through to your overloaded mind, where thorough trained and understood things can still be present and available. regardsAndre |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 16, 9:00 am, Andre Kubasik
wrote: I don't think a permanent display is neccessary any more. I'd think training is better that any display can be and being in severe and urgent trouble, a display, be it visual or audible, might not get through to your overloaded mind, where thorough trained and understood things can still be present and available. regardsAndre Andre, the nice thing about an AOA gauge is that it takes away the need to think about weight or bank angle when maneuvering near the stall. In a trainer, there usually isn't a lot of difference in weight (no ballast) and with a low wingloading, it's often easier to feel the stall coming, so low speed can be flown more by reference to feel than actually crosschecking the airspeed indicator - which often is misreading anyway at those low speeds. Now, move up to high performance glass (maybe with no stall warning), add ballast, and move to a crowded, low, narrow thermal - now there can be a significant difference between stalling airspeed (compared to no ballast, shallow bank, etc.) and if the pilot does not understand that the airspeed he is using has to be adjusted for the specific (and varying conditions - as bank angle changes) situation, it's easy to stall. Thats where the mind gets overloaded. OTOH, with a properly designed AOA system, you just slow down (puill) until you are at the AOA you want, and keep it there. Easier than airspeed, it's just attitude flying, as the AOA responds as fast as you move the stick. Sweet, as the kids say... The problem is simple - up to now, useful AOA systems tend to be complicated, fragile, and powered - unlike airspeed indicators. So they have not been developed for gliders. But you can say the same about variometers - look at what we are now using! Nobody want to go back to pellet varios, and most appreciate the safety factor of TE and audio - but it took demand from the user (and contest wins) to push their development. Somewhat similar change is going to happen eventually with altitude measurement and use - we still use the altimeter, when we really should be using GPS elevation for glides. Altimeter is great for talking to ATC and other gliders (assuming you have a current altimeter setting) but really doesn't show you how high you are above your destination. GPS does. Of course, it's complicated and requires power. Typically, a trainer (at least in the US) provides the student with airspeed (when it should also show him AOA - what the wing is really doing), altitude (when it should also show him elevation, so he understands the difference), and often only rate of climb (when he also needs to see rate of energy gain/loss, i.e. TE). So, we train with inexpensive, pneumatic, simple instruments that provide crude approximations of the information we really want, then hopefully move up to complicated, accurate instruments that provide the direct data we want (at least for vario and elevation). That's OK, as long as the student is made aware of the difference - or he may find out at his own peril! Cheers, KIrk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider angle of attack indicator by SafeFlight | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 53 | December 20th 07 12:29 PM |
Angle of attack | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 27 | December 19th 07 06:17 AM |
Stalls - Angle of Attack versus Vstall | [email protected] | Piloting | 44 | October 6th 06 01:26 AM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |