![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't buy lottery tickets, but let's just say I came up with a bunch of
money. Enough to satisfy my aviation needs and wants. One of the airplanes on my list would be something like a Pilatus PC-12 - a big, pressurized, turboprop single which would be an outstanding X/C aircraft for any destination in N. America. As background, I've got about 1,000 total hours. All VFR, with a bunch of X/C trips. I currently fly an RV-6 which has a lot of dyamic performance, but is a very simple airplane. It and rental Cessnas, my old Tomahawk, and a few other similar aircraft are the limits of my experience. Beyond the obvious ratings issues (Complex, High performance, IFR, etc), what would a logical step-up sequence be for moving up to something like the Pilatus? Gain proficiency in an Arrow, then move on to a Malibu, then.... Just curious about what additonal training/experience it would take to effectively transition to something like the Pilatus. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... I don't buy lottery tickets, but let's just say I came up with a bunch of money. Enough to satisfy my aviation needs and wants. One of the airplanes on my list would be something like a Pilatus PC-12 - a big, pressurized, turboprop single which would be an outstanding X/C aircraft for any destination in N. America. As background, I've got about 1,000 total hours. All VFR, with a bunch of X/C trips. I currently fly an RV-6 which has a lot of dyamic performance, but is a very simple airplane. It and rental Cessnas, my old Tomahawk, and a few other similar aircraft are the limits of my experience. Beyond the obvious ratings issues (Complex, High performance, IFR, etc), what would a logical step-up sequence be for moving up to something like the Pilatus? Gain proficiency in an Arrow, then move on to a Malibu, then.... Just curious about what additonal training/experience it would take to effectively transition to something like the Pilatus. Instrument rating...Arrow, Malibu...sure. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote Beyond the obvious ratings issues (Complex, High performance, IFR, etc), what would a logical step-up sequence be for moving up to something like the Pilatus? Gain proficiency in an Arrow, then move on to a Malibu, then.... Just curious about what additonal training/experience it would take to effectively transition to something like the Pilatus. Why bother with step ups? Since you had just come into all of this money, with 1,000 hours, perhaps the best thing would be to get a good instructor that has plenty of time and experience in a big pressurized turboprop, and do a lot of flying with him. Do a bunch of intensive training, then take him along on some challenging trips. Fly in the mountains, fly in the bad weather, fly into short and high strips, fly in the busy complex airspaces, and expand your capabilities with your new mount. Make sense? I would not think that their could be many step ups that could truly prepare you for a Pilatus. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kyle Boatright" writes:
I don't buy lottery tickets, but let's just say I came up with a bunch of money. Enough to satisfy my aviation needs and wants. One of the airplanes on my list would be something like a Pilatus PC-12 - a big, pressurized, turboprop single which would be an outstanding X/C aircraft for any destination in N. America. My understanding (from talking to those who fly them) is that something like a Citation II, faster, cheaper, quieter and goes further -- as long as your flight hours per year are not too high. (Aka, the Citation has a low fixed cost and high hourly cost, while the Pilatus has a high purchase price but a much lower hourly cost.) Chris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message ... Kyle Boatright wrote: I don't buy lottery tickets, but let's just say I came up with a bunch of money. Enough to satisfy my aviation needs and wants. One of the airplanes on my list would be something like a Pilatus PC-12 - a big, pressurized, turboprop single which would be an outstanding X/C aircraft for any destination in N. America. How about a Kodiak? The issue isn't really the airplane. Shoot, if I got enough $, I'd just buy one of each. Of course, I'd need a lot of hangar space, but with all that money I'm sure it wouldn't be a problem. ;-) The question is/was what I would need to do to become a proficient pilot in a substantially more complex, systems dependant airplane... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... I don't buy lottery tickets, but let's just say I came up with a bunch of money. Enough to satisfy my aviation needs and wants. One of the airplanes on my list would be something like a Pilatus PC-12 - a big, pressurized, turboprop single which would be an outstanding X/C aircraft for any destination in N. America. Seems like I remember that this scenario actually happened to one of our posters a few years back...I was just getting into the group then. Any one remember the fella that hit the jackpot and was trying to figure out which planes (plural) to buy? jf |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 5:07 pm, "Kyle Boatright" wrote:
I don't buy lottery tickets, but let's just say I came up with a bunch of money. Enough to satisfy my aviation needs and wants. One of the airplanes on my list would be something like a Pilatus PC-12 - a big, pressurized, turboprop single which would be an outstanding X/C aircraft for any destination in N. America. As background, I've got about 1,000 total hours. All VFR, with a bunch of X/C trips. I currently fly an RV-6 which has a lot of dyamic performance, but is a very simple airplane. It and rental Cessnas, my old Tomahawk, and a few other similar aircraft are the limits of my experience. Beyond the obvious ratings issues (Complex, High performance, IFR, etc), what would a logical step-up sequence be for moving up to something like the Pilatus? Gain proficiency in an Arrow, then move on to a Malibu, then.... Just curious about what additonal training/experience it would take to effectively transition to something like the Pilatus. Boeing Business Jet. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beyond the obvious ratings issues (Complex, High performance, IFR, etc),
what would a logical step-up sequence be for moving up to something like the Pilatus? Gain proficiency in an Arrow, then move on to a Malibu, then.... Hell, if you've got all that money, who cares about a "step-up sequence"? Just buy one of each of the following, and fly 'em every day: - Cub (fun) - Maule (funner) - Helio Courier (funner yet!) - Columbia/Cessna 400 (cool) - Malibu Meridian (cooler) - Pilatus PC12 (coolest!) - Eclipse Jet (fast) - Cessna Mustang (faster) - Falcon (fastest) While you're at it, how 'bout some warbirds? - P-39 Airacobra - P-51 Mustang - F-86 Sabre - F-4 Phantom II - F-16 Viper Dang, this is fun, spending all your money! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
- F-16 Viper I've noticed this elsewhere. When did they stop calling the F16 the Falcon? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
- F-16 Viper
I've noticed this elsewhere. When did they stop calling the F16 the Falcon? I don't know anyone who calls it by its proper name, "Fighting Falcon". I have no idea why the name "Falcon" didn't catch on.... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how much money have you lost on the lottery? NOW GET THAT MONEY BACK! | shane | Home Built | 0 | February 5th 05 07:54 AM |