![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After years away from it, I'm in a position where I can think about getting
an airplane. I want to be able to travel with it, not just fly around the patch. I'm a PP-ASEL with about 170 hours in 172/Warrior/Tiger-class aircraft. I'd love to build, but my work has me away from home constantly, so there's no way I could commit the needed time. I also have medical issues that will require a special issuance medical; I've been thinking about getting that for the past 6 months, but haven't been able to do anything about it. I figure I'll need 5-10 hours of dual to get back in the groove. All of that has me convinced I should buy an SLSA that will serve as an IFR platform when I do deal with the medical. There are lots of SLSAs out there, but only a precious few that can be flown legally IFR (at least I think that's the case), with TSOd instruments and certificated engines, not to mention capable avionics. In addition, I think I want a metal airframe. Composites are great, but what happens when it collects hangar damage? Since it's a factory aircraft, I have to have an A&P do the repair, and how many A&Ps do composite repairs? Especially since I live in the middle of nowhere, relatively speaking (Fairmont, MN). Finally, and for many of the same reasons, I's prefer an American-built aircraft. The imports look good, but how many mechanics in rural Minnesota can work on them? How long does it take to get parts that, for an American aircraft, could be bought and shipped overnight from any of a dozen suppliers? So far, I've only seen one SLSA that fits this profile: the AMD Zodiac XLi. There are a bunch of them out there that have been homebuilt; I don't know how many completed ones AMD has sold. I like everything I've read so far. Of course, that's just reading, not flying. I'm planning to visit the AMD factory next week, look the place over, then look closely at the aircraft and take a demo flight. What should I look for? Ask about? Try during the demo? What other aircraft should I look at? Am I full of prunes in my thinking somewhere? -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Maynard wrote:
After years away from it, I'm in a position where I can think about getting an airplane. I want to be able to travel with it, not just fly around the patch. I'm a PP-ASEL with about 170 hours in 172/Warrior/Tiger-class aircraft. I'd love to build, but my work has me away from home constantly, so there's no way I could commit the needed time. I also have medical issues that will require a special issuance medical; I've been thinking about getting that for the past 6 months, but haven't been able to do anything about it. I figure I'll need 5-10 hours of dual to get back in the groove. All of that has me convinced I should buy an SLSA that will serve as an IFR platform when I do deal with the medical. There are lots of SLSAs out there, but only a precious few that can be flown legally IFR (at least I think that's the case), with TSOd instruments and certificated engines, not to mention capable avionics. In addition, I think I want a metal airframe. Composites are great, but what happens when it collects hangar damage? Since it's a factory aircraft, I have to have an A&P do the repair, and how many A&Ps do composite repairs? Especially since I live in the middle of nowhere, relatively speaking (Fairmont, MN). Finally, and for many of the same reasons, I's prefer an American-built aircraft. The imports look good, but how many mechanics in rural Minnesota can work on them? How long does it take to get parts that, for an American aircraft, could be bought and shipped overnight from any of a dozen suppliers? So far, I've only seen one SLSA that fits this profile: the AMD Zodiac XLi. There are a bunch of them out there that have been homebuilt; I don't know how many completed ones AMD has sold. I like everything I've read so far. Of course, that's just reading, not flying. I'm planning to visit the AMD factory next week, look the place over, then look closely at the aircraft and take a demo flight. What should I look for? Ask about? Try during the demo? What other aircraft should I look at? Am I full of prunes in my thinking somewhere? I'm building an XL and have flown in three different 601s including the Zenith demonstrator. It is a fun plane to fly with enough speed to be used X-C travel. You don't mention where you are but there are several 601XLs being used as trainers at various FBOs. Look into that for your dual and that should help you make your decision. As far as the medical goes remember if you try for an fail to get your special issuance you are grounded as far as LSA is concerned. So, if all of your flying is going to fall under the LSA rules you might want to think about not taking the chance of screwing that up. As a PPL sans medical the only privileges you will be giving up are night and higher than 10K feet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-01-04, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
I'm building an XL and have flown in three different 601s including the Zenith demonstrator. It is a fun plane to fly with enough speed to be used X-C travel. You don't mention where you are but there are several 601XLs being used as trainers at various FBOs. Look into that for your dual and that should help you make your decision. I'm in Fairmont, MN (FRM), 120 miles southwest of Minneapolis. The closest school using the Zodiac appears to be in Holland, MI, a long day's drive away. I suspect I'll be getting transition training from or through the folks at AMD. As far as the medical goes remember if you try for an fail to get your special issuance you are grounded as far as LSA is concerned. So, if all of your flying is going to fall under the LSA rules you might want to think about not taking the chance of screwing that up. As a PPL sans medical the only privileges you will be giving up are night and higher than 10K feet. This is why I'm going with an SLSA. I'll worry about the medical later, and only if I know I'll get it. If I do, then I want whatever aircraft I get to be able to serve me well with the upgraded privileges, which is why I'm looking at the XLi. I don't want to have to sell the aircraft in order to take advantage of the medical. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is one for rent at my local airport (LNA) I have checked out in and
used for several hours. There are things I really like about it, and things I don't. The superior visibility alone is almost worth it to me...almost. On balance, I have happily gone back to the rental Cessnas. Be sure to get all of those 5 or 10 hours in a Zodiac, and then you will know if it is the plane for you. A few trips around the patch with a demo pilot won't do it. I have reluctantly come to a conclusion about LSAs as our regulations presently exist in the USA: If you want a plane with a bulletproof engine that any small-plane A&P can fix, then you want an 0-200. If you want a full-tank, fill-both-seats cross-country machine, then you need something powered by an engine lighter than an 0-200; probably something like a 912. There is no free lunch. Where I fly, the Zodiac is the only rental that is not routinely sent out with the tanks full. Vaughn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-01-05, Vaughn Simon wrote:
There is one for rent at my local airport (LNA) I have checked out in and used for several hours. There are things I really like about it, and things I don't. The superior visibility alone is almost worth it to me...almost. On balance, I have happily gone back to the rental Cessnas. Be sure to get all of those 5 or 10 hours in a Zodiac, and then you will know if it is the plane for you. A few trips around the patch with a demo pilot won't do it. Okkay, so what don't you like about it? It's going to be tough for me to get several hours in one. I have reluctantly come to a conclusion about LSAs as our regulations presently exist in the USA: If you want a plane with a bulletproof engine that any small-plane A&P can fix, then you want an 0-200. If you want a full-tank, fill-both-seats cross-country machine, then you need something powered by an engine lighter than an 0-200; probably something like a 912. There is no free lunch. Hm. With a useful load of 550 pounds, and a 30-gallon tank, and me and my roommate together weighing 350 pounds, that leaves 20 pounds of luggage, enough for a weekend. What am I missing? Where I fly, the Zodiac is the only rental that is not routinely sent out with the tanks full. Has it got tabs? -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Maynard" wrote in message ... On 2008-01-05, Vaughn Simon wrote: There is one for rent at my local airport (LNA) I have checked out in and used for several hours. There are things I really like about it, and things I don't. The superior visibility alone is almost worth it to me...almost. On balance, I have happily gone back to the rental Cessnas. Be sure to get all of those 5 or 10 hours in a Zodiac, and then you will know if it is the plane for you. A few trips around the patch with a demo pilot won't do it. Okkay, so what don't you like about it? In general, the thing seems fragile and "fussy" to me. The seat is way too uncomfortable for more than local flying. (It feels like the wing spar is hitting you in the middle of the back) The canopy (which gives great visibility) is a PITA. It almost takes two people to close it because you must spring it into shape to get it to close on both latches. In my personal opinion (I come from a glider and Cessna background so take this with a grain of salt) the thing just needs more wing. It hates to climb and loves to come back down. I like the control stick and the sensitive controls, but others hate it for just that reason. It's going to be tough for me to get several hours in one. How about a nice Florida vacation? PBFT has a nice Zodiac for rent in the Palm Beach area. The flying weather is great during the winter. I have reluctantly come to a conclusion about LSAs as our regulations presently exist in the USA: If you want a plane with a bulletproof engine that any small-plane A&P can fix, then you want an 0-200. If you want a full-tank, fill-both-seats cross-country machine, then you need something powered by an engine lighter than an 0-200; probably something like a 912. There is no free lunch. Hm. With a useful load of 550 pounds, and a 30-gallon tank, and me and my roommate together weighing 350 pounds, that leaves 20 pounds of luggage, enough for a weekend. What am I missing? You are lucky, your average pair of USA pilots runs more like 380 pounds. Also, just my flight bag can weigh 20 pounds. There are also other useful weight-robbing things that you may not have considered, like engine oil and various accessories. Where I fly, the Zodiac is the only rental that is not routinely sent out with the tanks full. Has it got tabs? No, and because of the shape and tilt of the tanks it is hard to tell how much is in them. The gauges on the Zodiac seem to be excellent, particularly compared to the POS in Cessnas. I haven't had enough cross-country in the Zodiac to know if they can truly be trusted. The over-center gas caps are a PITA. I don't mean to sound negative on the Zodiac, there are many things I like about it. Just be sure to invest the time to properly shop around before making such a big investment. Vaughn |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-01-05, Vaughn Simon wrote:
I don't mean to sound negative on the Zodiac, there are many things I like about it. Just be sure to invest the time to properly shop around before making such a big investment. Betcherass. That's why I'm looking for all of the opinions I can get. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vaughn Simon wrote:
(It feels like the wing spar is hitting you in the middle of the back) Strange because the Spar is under your knees. The canopy (which gives great visibility) is a PITA. It almost takes two people to close it because you must spring it into shape to get it to close on both latches. In my personal opinion (I come from a glider and Cessna background so take this with a grain of salt) the thing just needs more wing. It hates to climb and loves to come back down. You think it sucks to close you ought to try building it. I like the control stick and the sensitive controls, but others hate it for just that reason. Are they making any of the factory built LSAs with dual stick? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-01-07, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
Vaughn Simon wrote: I like the control stick and the sensitive controls, but others hate it for just that reason. Are they making any of the factory built LSAs with dual stick? It's listed as a standard option in the current price sheet. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig601XLBuilder" wrote in message ... Strange because the Spar is under your knees. OK, then SOMETHING hits you right in the middle of the back. You think it sucks to close you ought to try building it. I have no doubt! Even the simplest canopies are a bear to build. At least the Zodiac canopy is hinged in the front. I am a "glider guy" & I can tell you confidently that any other configuration is an accident waiting to happen. Are they making any of the factory built LSAs with dual stick? Without dual controls, how would you use it as a trainer? ...or even safely check out a rental pilot? Vaughn |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zodiac XL vs Rans S-19 vs Van's RV-12 | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 12 | July 2nd 06 10:31 PM |
LSA - Zodiac CH601XL | Al | Home Built | 11 | January 12th 06 11:01 PM |
Any opinions on Zodiac XL? | JK | Home Built | 7 | May 3rd 05 10:51 PM |
Thinking about buying a Mooney | Thomas Borchert | Owning | 46 | August 15th 04 09:23 PM |
Zenith Zodiac XL question | Mick | Home Built | 4 | January 14th 04 05:47 PM |