![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To understand the Constitutional issues involved in holding prisoners in Cuba
go to Google and download the Supreme Court case " Ex Parte Milligan 1866". That will make everything clear. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ArtKramr" wrote in message
... To understand the Constitutional issues involved in holding prisoners in Cuba go to Google and download the Supreme Court case " Ex Parte Milligan 1866". That will make everything clear. I thought the whole situation was to set international precedent now allowing foreign powers to hold US citizens on a whim for years on end without access to legal representation. :^) Si |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Why Guantanamo?
From: "Simon Robbins" Date: 12/28/03 4:21 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... To understand the Constitutional issues involved in holding prisoners in Cuba go to Google and download the Supreme Court case " Ex Parte Milligan 1866". That will make everything clear. I thought the whole situation was to set international precedent now allowing foreign powers to hold US citizens on a whim for years on end without access to legal representation. :^) Si Yes. And the Ex Parte Milligan decision doesn't allow that on US soil. Ergo Guantanamo where one is out of reach of the Milligan decision.. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Simon Robbins" writes: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... To understand the Constitutional issues involved in holding prisoners in Cuba go to Google and download the Supreme Court case " Ex Parte Milligan 1866". That will make everything clear. I thought the whole situation was to set international precedent now allowing foreign powers to hold US citizens on a whim for years on end without access to legal representation. :^) You mean as already happens in various parts of South & Central America, Southeast and Southwest Asia, various spots in the Middle East, and a fair chunk of Sub-Saharan Africa? I wouldn't sweat that precedent so much. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|