![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.aopa.org/aircraft/article...207hangar.html
Glad it's been saved. We're fighting our own hangar battle here, and losing. The historic Boeing/United Hangar -- one of just seven original Boeing air mail hangars left in the country -- is slated for demolition as soon as the snow melts. As anyone steeped in aviation history knows, Iowa City was at the heart of the transcontinental airmail line -- the precursor for all commercial aviation in America and the world. This hangar is an irreplaceable piece of aviation history, but the FAA has deemed it to be "too close to the runway for modern safety standards" -- and it must go. It's so frustrating. I live in one of the most left-wing, liberal cities in America, where government spending on ANYTHING is routinely approved -- but (because it's not a Victorian house) our 78-year old gem isn't even considered by our local "Historic Preservation" groups. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
http://www.aopa.org/aircraft/article...207hangar.html Glad it's been saved. We're fighting our own hangar battle here, and losing. The historic Boeing/United Hangar -- one of just seven original Boeing air mail hangars left in the country -- is slated for demolition as soon as the snow melts. As anyone steeped in aviation history knows, Iowa City was at the heart of the transcontinental airmail line -- the precursor for all commercial aviation in America and the world. This hangar is an irreplaceable piece of aviation history, but the FAA has deemed it to be "too close to the runway for modern safety standards" -- and it must go. It's so frustrating. I live in one of the most left-wing, liberal cities in America, where government spending on ANYTHING is routinely approved -- but (because it's not a Victorian house) our 78-year old gem isn't even considered by our local "Historic Preservation" groups. I remember you talking about this before. Have you contacted any of the historic preservation groups that aren't local? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember you talking about this before. Have you contacted any of the
historic preservation groups that aren't local? Yep. We've had people from all over the country come look at the hangar. They've all decided it's just too danged big to move across the country. Locally, no one cares -- not even our airport commissioners. It's criminal, but it's pretty much a done deal. What really sucks is that they're using a federal grant to tear it down -- and applying for a new federal grant to build a new hangar of equal size! If they wanted to move the old hangar on the airport, it can be done for as little as $30K (not counting site prep and restoration costs, which could, admittedly, run several hundred thousand dollars) and they'd have a perfectly good -- and historic -- hangar. Apparently grants are available for new hangar construction, but not old hangar restoration. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:gOKqj.20266$9j6.9228@attbi_s22... I remember you talking about this before. Have you contacted any of the historic preservation groups that aren't local? Yep. We've had people from all over the country come look at the hangar. They've all decided it's just too danged big to move across the country. Locally, no one cares -- not even our airport commissioners. It's criminal, but it's pretty much a done deal. What really sucks is that they're using a federal grant to tear it down -- and applying for a new federal grant to build a new hangar of equal size! If they wanted to move the old hangar on the airport, it can be done for as little as $30K (not counting site prep and restoration costs, which could, admittedly, run several hundred thousand dollars) and they'd have a perfectly good -- and historic -- hangar. Apparently grants are available for new hangar construction, but not old hangar restoration. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" I am not ready to assume much of anything. A lot of federal grants are available for historic buildings of nearly all types and nearly all purposes; but it comes out of another "pocket" in the federal bureaucracy--other than the airport improvement fund. Peter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I remember you talking about this before. Have you contacted any of the historic preservation groups that aren't local? Yep. We've had people from all over the country come look at the hangar. They've all decided it's just too danged big to move across the country. Locally, no one cares -- not even our airport commissioners. It's criminal, but it's pretty much a done deal. What really sucks is that they're using a federal grant to tear it down -- and applying for a new federal grant to build a new hangar of equal size! If they wanted to move the old hangar on the airport, it can be done for as little as $30K (not counting site prep and restoration costs, which could, admittedly, run several hundred thousand dollars) and they'd have a perfectly good -- and historic -- hangar. Apparently grants are available for new hangar construction, but not old hangar restoration. I'm sure you've done this obvious step, but have you contacted your representatives/senators? Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote about losing an historic hangar.
Jay, are you certain you haven't seen a family of spotted owls living in it? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:33:00 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote in gOKqj.20266$9j6.9228@attbi_s22: What really sucks is that they're using a federal grant to tear it down -- and applying for a new federal grant to build a new hangar of equal size! If they wanted to move the old hangar on the airport, it can be done for as little as $30K (not counting site prep and restoration costs, which could, admittedly, run several hundred thousand dollars) and they'd have a perfectly good -- and historic -- hangar. Apparently grants are available for new hangar construction, but not old hangar restoration. Once you get the hangar listed, then all you have to do is write a grant proposal: http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/ The National Register of Historic Places is the Nation's official list of cultural resources worthy of preservation. Authorized under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the National Register is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect our historic and archeological resources. Properties listed in the Register include districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. The National Register is administered by the National Park Service, which is part of the U.S. Department of the Interior. What are the Listing Criteria? The National Register's standards for evaluating the significance of properties were developed to recognize the accomplishments of all peoples who have made a significant contribution to our country's history and heritage. The criteria are designed to guide State and local governments, Federal agencies, and others in evaluating potential entries in the National Register. http://www.nationalregisterofhistori...s.com/faq.html Criteria for Evaluation The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. The process varies from State to State depending on State workload, planning, and registration priorities, and the schedule of the review board. The process takes a minimum of 90 days to fulfill all of the review and notification requirements provided that a complete and fully documented nomination form has been completed for the property. Upon submission to the National Park Service, a decision on whether to list the property is made within 45 days. http://www.nationalregisterofhistori...com/forms.html Iowa Mr. Tom Morain State Historic Preservation Officer State Historical Society of Iowa 600 East Locust Street Des Moines, Iowa 50319-0290 515-281-8837 http://www.achp.gov/fpolist.html Contact Information for Federal Agency Historic Preservation Programs and Officers Department of Transportation (DOT) Ms. Linda Lawson Federal Preservation Officer Director Office of the Secretary Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Phone: 202.366.4835 Fax: 202.366.0263 E-mail: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Ms. Michon Washington Federal Preservation Officer Office of Environment and Energy, AEE-200 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Room 902 Washington, DC 20591 Phone: 202.267.9548 Fax: 202.267.5594 E-mail: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Once you get the hangar listed, then all you have to do is write a
grant proposal: Thanks for the ideas, Larry -- but no one wants the hangar put on the historic register and have it declared immovable. If this were to happen, our newly extended runway would be far less usable, because the new approach minimums will be set based on obstructions in the clear zone. Since the old hangar is right, smack in the new clear zone, right next to the runway, this would be catastrophic for the airport. We've waited since WWII for this new runway extension, and I'm not going to be part of anything that would jeopardize it. Now we can argue all day about the FAA's logic of declaring lower clear zones due to the removal of a hangar that has been sitting next to the runway for over 77 years -- but I think we both know that's a losing battle. Rules are rules. No, the only solution is to move it -- and no one wants to move it. Therefore, it's going to come down. What's truly sad is that we've got two major events in Iowa City this summer that would greatly benefit from the old airmail hangar. The "American Barnstormers Tour" is kicking off their summer tour in Iowa City in June, and the "Antique Aircraft Association" is going to be celebrating the 80th anniversary of airmail flights in America by reenacting the airmail flights that came through Iowa City -- in the authentic aircraft that did it originally! Both of these organizations have appealed to our airport commission, in hopes of using the original Boeing/United hangar during their visits -- to no avail. If the plans go forward, the hangar will be long gone before either of these events... :-( -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 7, 4:33*pm, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
I remember you talking about this before. Have you contacted any of the historic preservation groups that aren't local? Yep. * We've had people from all over the country come look at the hangar. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off to the Alexis Park Inn tomorrow | Peter R. | Piloting | 23 | July 2nd 06 03:53 AM |
Alexis Park Inn | Ron R | Piloting | 34 | February 6th 05 02:00 PM |
ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. | dlevy | Piloting | 13 | January 23rd 04 04:54 PM |
ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. | plumbus bobbus | Home Built | 0 | January 22nd 04 12:02 AM |
ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. | plumbus bobbus | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 22nd 04 12:02 AM |