![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This one brings back memories. I was in college at the time, Northrop
Institute of Technology, in Inglewood, CA. We had a class field trip to the Wing Aircraft Co., in nearby Torrance, and we saw two or three in the building. One was being converted to a test aircraft for a COIN venture. (COunter INsurgency). I believe it was going to be a display at Paris. They had already lost one in Florida, I think, during spin testing. They also gave the argument of why it was only a 2-seater.They said, studies were made that most 4+ place aircraft were only flown with 2 people, so why waste metal on a biggere aircraft? I think that philosophy killed them. The other aircraft that was flying at the time, that I was impressed with, was the Windecker Eagle. It just happened to be designed by a dentist who went to my school for engineering. I think it was the first all composite aircraft built. Unfortunately, that meant it was the first to try and go through FAA certification. I guess that ate up a lot of financing. A very nice looking single engine aircraft, though. Even the USAF bought one to check out. Ron "Dale Martin" wrote in message ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Ron Monroe" wrote: This one brings back memories. I was in college at the time, Northrop Institute of Technology, in Inglewood, CA. We had a class field trip to the Wing Aircraft Co., in nearby Torrance, and we saw two or three in the building. One was being converted to a test aircraft for a COIN venture. (COunter INsurgency). I believe it was going to be a display at Paris. They had already lost one in Florida, I think, during spin testing. They also gave the argument of why it was only a 2-seater.They said, studies were made that most 4+ place aircraft were only flown with 2 people, so why waste metal on a biggere aircraft? I think that philosophy killed them. That design philosophy was part of the problem. The rest was that they used an etch on the aluminum as part of the bonding process. Unfortunately, they did not sufficiently passivate the etch, so it continued to etch the aluminum after bonding. The result was a lot of airframes suitable only as planters. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wing Derringer at Chino (0/7) | Dale Martin | Aviation Photos | 2 | May 4th 11 05:23 PM |
Soft field landings - low wing vs high wing aircraft | Justin Gombos | Piloting | 19 | May 23rd 07 05:21 AM |
Books on Military Rotary Wing to Civilian Fixed Wing Transition? | Greg Copeland | Piloting | 5 | May 2nd 07 03:23 AM |
High wing to low wing converts...or, visa versa? | Jack Allison | Owning | 99 | January 27th 05 11:10 AM |
Mylar tape wing seals - effect on wing performance | Simon Waddell | Soaring | 8 | January 1st 04 03:46 PM |