![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We were always taught to refer to ourselves on the radio with our full
callsigns until ATC refers to us with a shortened callsign (i.e. the last three characters). However, I've noticed that the majority of the approach controllers refer to most of the GA aircraft as "November" followed by their numbers/letters. My question (to controllers in particular) is, do they prefer us to refer to ourselves thereafter as "November xxxxxx" as well or do they prefer us to keep with the "Cherokee/Cessna/Mooney..." moniker? Minor point--I know. I just like to try and improve at least one thing after each flight. Marco |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the Air Traffic Control Handbook:
"2-4-20. AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION Use the full identification in reply to aircraft with similar sounding identifications. For other aircraft, the same identification may be used in reply that the pilot used in his/her initial callup except use the correct identification after communications have been established. Identify aircraft as follows: a. U.S. registry aircraft. State one of the following: 1. Civil. State the prefix "November" when establishing initial communications with U.S. registered aircraft followed by the ICAO phonetic pronunciation of the numbers/letters of the aircraft registration. The controller may state the aircraft type, the model, the manufacturer's name, followed by the ICAO phonetic pronunciation of the numbers/letters of the aircraft registration if used by the pilot on the initial or subsequent call." From AIM 4-2-4(a)(3): "When the aircraft manufacturer's made or model is stated, the prefix 'N' is dropped." Take your choice. I personally never use November in communicating with ATC. Bob Gardner SAY AGAIN, PLEASE "Marco Leon" wrote in message ... We were always taught to refer to ourselves on the radio with our full callsigns until ATC refers to us with a shortened callsign (i.e. the last three characters). However, I've noticed that the majority of the approach controllers refer to most of the GA aircraft as "November" followed by their numbers/letters. My question (to controllers in particular) is, do they prefer us to refer to ourselves thereafter as "November xxxxxx" as well or do they prefer us to keep with the "Cherokee/Cessna/Mooney..." moniker? Minor point--I know. I just like to try and improve at least one thing after each flight. Marco |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marco Leon wrote:
My question (to controllers in particular) is, do they prefer us to refer to ourselves thereafter as "November xxxxxx" as well or do they prefer us to keep with the "Cherokee/Cessna/Mooney..." moniker? Technically, either way is correct, but I (and the few ATC guys I know) prefer to use the make/model, followed by the numbers. The main reason being that ATC will often point you out to others as traffic and in busy areas it helps with visual identification. I've found when a controller starts referring to me as "November xxx" it usually means he either didn't hear my aircraft type on the initial call, or he forgot it. A couple of times over the last few months when approach has been calling me "November xxx", they've later asked for my aircraft type before calling me out as traffic to another plane. This seems to be more common with Approach controllers than with towers. My biggest problem on initial call in is controllers admonishing me to use my full callsign, even though I am using it. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I've found when a controller starts referring to me as "November xxx" it usually means he either didn't hear my aircraft type on the initial call, or he forgot it. A couple of times over the last few months when approach has been calling me "November xxx", they've later asked for my aircraft type before calling me out as traffic to another plane. Generally, I hear a terse "NOVEMBER xxxxx" when I'm not paying attention and they've call me a coupla times. Sightseeing, BSing with pax, etc. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JGalban via AviationKB.com" wrote: I've found when a controller starts referring to me as "November xxx" it usually means he either didn't hear my aircraft type on the initial call, or he forgot it. Or he was unsure of what he heard. I used to fly a Cessna Cutlass. When I checked in using that type, controllers often came back with "November xxxxx" because they seldom heard that type, I suppose...or they said "Douglas xxxxx" or "Cardinal xxxxx" or some such. Now that I'm flying a Skylane, that sort of thing seldom happens. -- Dan T-182T at 4R4 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to fly a Cessna Cutlass. When I checked in using that type,
controllers often came back with "November xxxxx" because they seldom heard that type, I suppose...or they said "Douglas xxxxx" or "Cardinal xxxxx" or some such. Now that I'm flying a Skylane, that sort of thing seldom happens. We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-03-15, Jay Honeck wrote:
I used to fly a Cessna Cutlass. When I checked in using that type, controllers often came back with "November xxxxx" because they seldom heard that type, I suppose...or they said "Douglas xxxxx" or "Cardinal xxxxx" or some such. We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. I'm curious to see what the reactions to "Zodiac five five zulu charlie" will be. There's not much I can replace it with. What do I tell ATC when they ask what that is? (Aside from "my airplane", of course.) -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!) AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (getting ready to order) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:17:29 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. Try "Sundowner"... Then, you give them Bravo-Echo-2-3 as a type, and get "Why is your Bonanza going so slow?" several times, as BE33 was typed in to the ATC system. G |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-03-15, john smith wrote:
Jay Maynard wrote: I'm curious to see what the reactions to "Zodiac five five zulu charlie" will be. There's not much I can replace it with. What do I tell ATC when they ask what that is? (Aside from "my airplane", of course.) You say EXPERIMENTAL. Nope. It's not an experimental, but an SLSA. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!) AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (getting ready to order) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:J%PCj.23717$TT4.11472@attbi_s22: I used to fly a Cessna Cutlass. When I checked in using that type, controllers often came back with "November xxxxx" because they seldom heard that type, I suppose...or they said "Douglas xxxxx" or "Cardinal xxxxx" or some such. Now that I'm flying a Skylane, that sort of thing seldom happens. We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. It's a cherokee, moron. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fessing up time on callsigns | José Herculano | Naval Aviation | 26 | February 5th 05 08:31 AM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterous you have seen? | Giz | Naval Aviation | 27 | September 10th 03 04:58 AM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterous | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 6 | August 31st 03 02:51 PM |
Callsigns from hell... | José Herculano | Naval Aviation | 27 | August 30th 03 04:44 PM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterousyou have seen? | Doug \Woody\ and Erin Beal | Naval Aviation | 1 | August 26th 03 03:45 AM |