![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is Bush Doomed?
by Paul Craig Roberts Fear must be coursing through President Bush's veins as he realizes the Iraqi trap in which the neocons have placed him. Bush is caught between an Iraqi civil war and a wider insurgency. Desperate to extricate himself from the weekly carnage well before the November election, Bush can neither deliver on his promise of democracy via direct elections nor impose his plan for an Iraqi assembly elected indirectly by caucuses. If Bush delivers on his democracy promise, the Shi'ites with 60% of the population will be elected, and the country will break out in civil war. If he tries to water down Shi'ite representation with his plan for an assembly elected indirectly by caucuses, the so far peaceful Shi'ites are likely to join the violence. If the Shi'ites become violent, the insurgency would be too large to be contained by our present occupying force. Moreover, the outbreak of a general rebellion in Iraq would spill over throughout the Middle East where unpopular secular rulers are sitting on a smoldering Islam. Our puppet in Pakistan would likely bite the dust. Israel would then face countervailing Muslim nukes. If you think more US troops are needed now in Iraq, imagine how many more would be required to deal with a wider conflagration. Where would they come from? The US military is already so thinly stretched that soon 40% of the occupying troops will be drawn from the National Guard and reservists, resulting in tremendous disruption in the affairs of tens of thousands of families. Pilots and troops are shunning the cash bonuses offered for reenlistments. The troops recognize a quagmire even if their neocon overlords cannot. The only source of troops is the draft. A Shi'ite insurgency that brought back the draft would deprive Bush of reelection. A civil war with the prospect of a Kurdish state would bring in the Turks. On January 14 Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said that Turkey will intervene in the event of Iraq's disintegration. The Shi'ites and the Turks are forming an alliance as both have the same interest in maintaining the geographical integrity of the Iraqi state. The US could come dangerously close to military conflict with a NATO ally. All of this was perfectly clear well in advance of the ill-considered invasion. If Bush wasn't smart enough to see it, why didn't his National Security Advisor or his Secretary of State? How did a handful of neocon ideologues hijack US foreign policy? Bush did not campaign on a neocon policy of conquest in the Middle East. There was no public debate over this policy. The invasion of Iraq was the private agenda of the neocons. Why have the neocons not been held responsible for their treason in abusing their presidential appointments to substitute their personal agenda for America's agenda? Bush has been the neocon's puppet for so long that he is now stuck with responsibility for their horrible mistake. With no way of his own to get out of his trap, his arrogance toward the "irrelevant" UN and our doubting allies has disappeared. Come bail me out, he pleads. Bush, desperate to be extricated before doom strikes him is experiencing a reality totally different from the chest-thumping of neocon megalomaniacs, such as Charles Krauthammer, who declared the US so powerful as to be able to "reshape, indeed remake, reality on its own." Bush now knows that he lacks the power to deal with the reality of Iraq. Indeed, Bush cannot even deal with his own appointees. January 17, 2004 Dr. Roberts [send him mail] is John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy, Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute. He is a former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal and a former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury. He is the co-author of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. Copyright © 2004 Creators Syndicate Paul Craig Roberts Archives Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Galt" wrote
Is Bush Doomed? No one votes anymore. He's got just as much chance as any other loser in politics. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gene Storey" wrote in message news:gPjOb.495$ce2.323@okepread03...
"John Galt" wrote Is Bush Doomed? Carman wrote: Only in the sense that you, I, and everyone else is doomed. His political future is looking pretty good. You should get ready for four more years of lower taxes and robust economy. No one votes anymore. Carman wrote: You mean you can't be bothered. The world is run by those who show up. If you'd rather stay at home and watch events as interpreted for you by Disney and CNN that's fine. Just don't be too surprised when it fails to make sense. He's got just as much chance as any other loser in politics. Carman wrote: GWB a loser? Are you serious? I guess you do watch a lot of television. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jos.Carman" wrote
GWB a loser? Are you serious? I guess you do watch a lot of television. Loser = Credit Card Fanatic (GWB has no regard for either the deficit, the debt, or the balance of trade. His policies are to charge it). According to a former cabinet member, he is "like a blind man in room full of deaf people." That's another definition of a loser. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gene Storey" wrote in message
news:mkuOb.544$ce2.195@okepread03... "Jos.Carman" wrote GWB a loser? Are you serious? I guess you do watch a lot of television. Loser = Credit Card Fanatic (GWB has no regard for either the deficit, the debt, or the balance of trade. His policies are to charge it). Wars cost money? Want to cut and run because the deficit rises? It is still small when compared to the GNP. According to a former cabinet member, he is "like a blind man in room full of deaf people." Quoting a man with a mouthful of sour grapes is likely to get one splattered with purple juice. That's another definition of a loser. Go ahead and don't vote. I'll be more than happy to make decisions for you! -- Kent Finnell From the Music City USA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kent Finnell" wrote
"Gene Storey" wrote "Jos.Carman" wrote GWB a loser? Are you serious? I guess you do watch a lot of television. Loser = Credit Card Fanatic (GWB has no regard for either the deficit, the debt, or the balance of trade. His policies are to charge it). Wars cost money? Want to cut and run because the deficit rises? It is still small when compared to the GNP. The GNP is computed using the same auditors as Enron used. Wars cost money, but that's not where the revenue is going. We have so many nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, and reserve officers on active duty, that a pit has become ops-normal. If we would move the retirement age to 89, we would cut the deficit to zero in just a few years. War or no war. It's bad policy to pay people not to work. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article mkuOb.544$ce2.195@okepread03,
on Sun, 18 Jan 2004 05:44:16 -0600, Gene Storey attempted to say ..... According to a former cabinet member, he is "like a blind man in room full of deaf people." You meant to say a FIRED cabinet member ? That's another definition of a loser. Sour grapes of someone who got themselves fired ? Yes. -- When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gene Storey" wrote in message news:mkuOb.544$ce2.195@okepread03...
"Jos.Carman" wrote GWB a loser? Are you serious? I guess you do watch a lot of television. Loser = Credit Card Fanatic (GWB has no regard for either the deficit, the debt, or the balance of trade. His policies are to charge it). According to a former cabinet member, he is "like a blind man in room full of deaf people." That's another definition of a loser. Carman wrote: Definately too much television! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Galt" wrote in message om... Is Bush Doomed? He's doing very well in the polls for someone who is doomed! This is wishful thinking by the do-nothing left. Jarg |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So did his father at this time of the election . I think Bush SR had 70%
approval and still lost. To be fair I have to mention that Bush SR had Perot to deal with. More than likely Bush SR would have won reelection in 92 if Perot had not run. If the economy gets better Bush will probably win unless Iraq turns into a disastaer soon. "Jarg" wrote in message om... "John Galt" wrote in message om... Is Bush Doomed? He's doing very well in the polls for someone who is doomed! This is wishful thinking by the do-nothing left. Jarg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 28th 04 10:36 PM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 28th 04 11:30 AM |