![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have been having a friendly discussion in aus.aviation as to whether or
not there was a model of DH Mossie that was fitted with counter rotating props. The time frame is not important ie: during war years or post war. If anyone has a pic of this beastie it would be appreciated With thanks Graham (Australia) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "TacAN" wrote in message ... We have been having a friendly discussion in aus.aviation as to whether or not there was a model of DH Mossie that was fitted with counter rotating props. The time frame is not important ie: during war years or post war. If anyone has a pic of this beastie it would be appreciated With thanks Graham (Australia) My bet is no. I have not seen a photo of such an animal. One such aircraft was proposed in November of 1941, to be numbered DH 101/102. Name change. This proposal came about with the advent of the Sabre engine availability. It was proposed that the a/c would be outfitted with Napier Sabre N.S. 19 SIM two-stage, three-speed (supercharger?) (32,000 ft.) engine with 15-ft counter-rotating airscrews, when this becomes available. The anticipated top speed 430 mph, cruise 328 mph. It never saw the light of day, but it was an idea. I hope you win your bet. Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From A.J. Jackson's book "De Havilland Aircraft since 1909":
D.H.99 TWIN SABRE BOMBER This type number covered proposals made to the Ministry of Aircraft Production in November 1941 for a scaled-up Mosquito night bomber with two high altitude Napier Sabre N.S.8SM engines cruising at 300 m.p.h. and having a range of 2,200 miles and operating at 27,000 ft. with a bomb load of 18,000 Ib. Development was envisaged with Sabre N.S.19 SIM two-stage, three speed engines driving 15 ft. diameter contra-rotating airscrews to increase the full load cruise to 328 m.p.h. at 32,000 ft. In December 1941 the twin Sabre project was renamed D.H.101 and D.H.99 was re-allotted to designs for a light, twin engined civil aircraft which J. P. Smith and the Moth Minor team had been working on at the outbreak of war, and which, due to military commitments, did not materialise. D.H.101 TWIN SABRE BOMBER The twin Napier Sabre bomber proposals, formerly designated D.H.99, were renumbered D.H.101 in December 1941. Air Ministry Specification B.11/41 was written round them but on April 4, 1942 de Havillands were informed that Sabre engines would not be available and that Rolls-Royce Griffons should be considered. In view of the expected reduction in performance with these engines, the project was immediately terminated. D.H.102 MOSQUITO REPLACEMENT This layout was similar to the projected D.H.101 but envisaged a lower powered night bomber to Specification B.4/42. Referred to as the Mosquito replacement, it was to have been fitted with two Rolls-Royce Griffon or Merlin engines and carry a 5,000 Ib. bomb load at a lower speed than its namesake. Construction began, but work ceased in December 1942 when de Havillands became preoccupied with the D.H.I03 Hornet. Bob "Robert Sveinson" wrote in message ... "TacAN" wrote in message ... We have been having a friendly discussion in aus.aviation as to whether or not there was a model of DH Mossie that was fitted with counter rotating props. The time frame is not important ie: during war years or post war. If anyone has a pic of this beastie it would be appreciated With thanks Graham (Australia) My bet is no. I have not seen a photo of such an animal. One such aircraft was proposed in November of 1941, to be numbered DH 101/102. Name change. This proposal came about with the advent of the Sabre engine availability. It was proposed that the a/c would be outfitted with Napier Sabre N.S. 19 SIM two-stage, three-speed (supercharger?) (32,000 ft.) engine with 15-ft counter-rotating airscrews, when this becomes available. The anticipated top speed 430 mph, cruise 328 mph. It never saw the light of day, but it was an idea. I hope you win your bet. Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you mean single-rotation props mounted on "handed" engines with opposite
rotation then, yes, there were Mossies with this feature. For instance, the Mark XVI. The engines were a Merlin 72 (starboard) and a Merlin 73(port). "TacAN" wrote in message ... We have been having a friendly discussion in aus.aviation as to whether or not there was a model of DH Mossie that was fitted with counter rotating props. The time frame is not important ie: during war years or post war. If anyone has a pic of this beastie it would be appreciated With thanks Graham (Australia) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message 9RCIj.4797$ie3.2010@trndny02, bob writes
If you mean single-rotation props mounted on "handed" engines with opposite rotation then, yes, there were Mossies with this feature. For instance, the Mark XVI. The engines were a Merlin 72 (starboard) and a Merlin 73(port). Can you give a source for that? I've never come across it before. The Mk XVI did have Merlin 72 and 73 engines, but they were both RH drive, as were all other Mosquito engines. The difference between the 72 and 73 was that the latter had a cabin supercharger. I would have thought that if paired handed Merlins had been available, DH would have used them in the Sea Mosquito. They weren't and they didn't. Paired handed Merlins were the 130 and 131 used in the Hornet I and Sea Hornet XX, and the 134 and 135, used in the Hornet F.III and Sea Hornet 21. Source: British Piston Aero-Engines and their Aircraft. "TacAN" wrote in message ... We have been having a friendly discussion in aus.aviation as to whether or not there was a model of DH Mossie that was fitted with counter rotating props. The time frame is not important ie: during war years or post war. If anyone has a pic of this beastie it would be appreciated With thanks Graham (Australia) Please don't top post, it makes it difficult to follow a thread. -- Peter Ying tong iddle-i po! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , TacAN
writes We have been having a friendly discussion in aus.aviation as to whether or not there was a model of DH Mossie that was fitted with counter rotating props. The time frame is not important ie: during war years or post war. If anyone has a pic of this beastie it would be appreciated With thanks Graham (Australia) Do you mean two props driven by one engine (like the Shackleton) or two props going in opposite directions (like the P-38 and the DH Hornet)? In either case the answer's No, AFAIK. I'll check the opposite handed case after I've had my dinner. SMBO has just summoned me... -- Peter Ying tong iddle-i po! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms? | buttman | Piloting | 10 | November 11th 06 03:47 PM |
Whats the deal with counter-rotating props? | Dico | Owning | 38 | February 2nd 06 09:04 PM |
Counter rotating propellers | Raoul | Military Aviation | 24 | September 21st 04 05:59 AM |
A Public Domain Disclosure- A Passive Counter-rotating Auxillary Propellor. | [email protected] | Piloting | 11 | March 26th 04 02:44 AM |
Tornado vs Mirage 2000 in offensive counter-air role | LoveBug | Military Aviation | 9 | July 26th 03 05:00 PM |