![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't get the reason for the Cozy or the Velocity (which isn't selling
anyway) from the standpoint of speed, comfort, etc. The $$$ come out the same for the most part and you don't have composite issues or trouble getting things fixed. Pusher/tractor preferences aside, am I missing something that would or does make one of the canards a better purchase? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 May 2008 12:35:13 -0400, Linton Yarbrough
wrote: I don't get the reason for the Cozy or the Velocity (which isn't selling anyway) from the standpoint of speed, comfort, etc. The $$$ come out the same for the most part and you don't have composite issues or trouble getting things fixed. Pusher/tractor preferences aside, am I missing something that would or does make one of the canards a better purchase? not necessarily. you only get the performance figures *after* you've built the design and flown it. aviation is littered with designs that looked promising but werent. Stealth Pilot |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
test, can't seem to post as get error from Google
On May 3, 9:35 am, Linton Yarbrough wrote: I don't get the reason for the Cozy or the Velocity (which isn't selling anyway) from the standpoint of speed, comfort, etc. The $$$ come out the same for the most part and you don't have composite issues or trouble getting things fixed. Pusher/tractor preferences aside, am I missing something that would or does make one of the canards a better purchase? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet. We were unable to post your message If you believe this is an error, please contact Google Support. On May 12, 6:12 am, jsbougher wrote: test, can't seem to post as get error from Google On May 3, 9:35 am, Linton Yarbrough wrote: I don't get the reason for the Cozy or the Velocity (which isn't selling anyway) from the standpoint of speed, comfort, etc. The $$$ come out the same for the most part and you don't have composite issues or trouble getting things fixed. Pusher/tractor preferences aside, am I missing something that would or does make one of the canards a better purchase? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Comments from a Velocity owner and aeronautical engineer who also
didn't have time to build, so bought instead. Additional comment is that my Dad has a Mooney 201 that I've flown quite a bit so I think I'm fairly well placed to at least comment on your question. For me, there were a few big drivers for the Velocity. 1) Stall characteristics - I can pull the throttle, slow to stall speed, roll into a 45 degree bank and pull the stick to my stomach and nothing happens. I know this isn't an issue for "good" pilots, but the records are littered with stall/spins. I'm human and make mistakes. Whether rational or not, the stall/spin is one of my biggest fears. 2) Maintenance / avionics - with a homebuilt, I can do everything myself outside of the "annual". This has helped with the nuisance issues, but I still use the local A&P for a lot of work. Additionally, I have access to cutting edge development that is too expensive or simply not available to certified aircraft. Example is my Trutrak 2 axis autopilot / ADI. I absolutely love it and my Dad can't put it in his Mooney without a LOT of effort if at all. 3) Factory support / aircraft complexity - factory support may not be as good as Mooney, but in the experimental world the ability to get factory check out and factory annual is a big deal. Also note that the Velocity can perform extremely well as a VERY simple airplane. My plane is fixed prop, fixed gear and keeps us with a 201. My plane is more basic from a maintenance perspective than a Cessna 172 and was it a simple transition from that plane. 4) Useful load - I can put myself, my wife, both kids, the dog and a weekends worth of luggage into it and still easily cover 300-400 miles. Jeff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Google sucks and won't let me post remainder of story. If you're
interested, let me know and I can e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jsbougher wrote:
Google sucks and won't let me post remainder of story. If you're interested, let me know and I can e-mail. It let you post 4 times in 10 minutes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 12, 7:25 am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote: jsbougher wrote: Google sucks and won't let me post remainder of story. If you're interested, let me know and I can e-mail. It let you post 4 times in 10 minutes. Yup, and not a single one is what I had in the message window. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
canard flying boat | Darrel Toepfer | Home Built | 14 | October 19th 15 07:37 AM |
My first four flights on an RJ.03 IBIS canard | Hans | Home Built | 3 | August 25th 07 06:43 PM |
Aircraft ID? canard biz plane | Ron Hardin | General Aviation | 5 | October 1st 06 09:55 PM |
Canard nose pading | Paul Lee | Home Built | 6 | January 9th 04 07:36 AM |
Dumb Canard Question. | Russell Kent | Home Built | 39 | October 19th 03 03:25 PM |