![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The U.S. built and flew a few disc aircraft during WW2. The Chance Vought V-173
first flew 23 November 1942, which had excellent STOL capabilities and was apparently impossible to stall. The Navy ordered two XF5U-1 which didn't get their propellers until 1947 and were not proceded with since the Navy decided jets were the way to go. This brings 2 questions to mind. 1) if jets hadn't been successful that early would the aircraft have found a militarily justifiable purpuse? 2) as thin as the saucer was what kind of useful payload could be expected? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This brings 2 questions to mind. 1) if jets hadn't been successful that early would the aircraft have found a militarily justifiable purpuse? 2) as thin as the saucer was what kind of useful payload could be expected? Dan, by luck I happen to have my V-173 file out on my scanner to copy for a Brit making a 1/2 scale flying model. One thing to note is that the disc was NOT thin at all and there was a vast amount of internal space - plenty of room for a decent bomb-bay or weapons if a warplane variant was to be coaxed out of this technology study. What I always wondered is why this design wasn't altered to use Jumo 004s embedded in the wings like the Horten? Oh, yeah, thats because Jumos sucked ![]() v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Donate your memories - write a note on the back and send your old photos to a reputable museum, don't take them with you when you're gone. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Krztalizer)
Date: 2/20/2004 12:33 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: This brings 2 questions to mind. 1) if jets hadn't been successful that early would the aircraft have found a militarily justifiable purpuse? 2) as thin as the saucer was what kind of useful payload could be expected? Dan, by luck I happen to have my V-173 file out on my scanner to copy for a Brit making a 1/2 scale flying model. One thing to note is that the disc was NOT thin at all and there was a vast amount of internal space - plenty of room for a decent bomb-bay or weapons if a warplane variant was to be coaxed out of this technology study. What I always wondered is why this design wasn't altered to use Jumo 004s embedded in the wings like the Horten? Oh, yeah, thats because Jumos sucked ![]() v/r Gordon All jet engines do. Actually the prop wash was supposed to help its STOL characteristics. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Krztalizer" wrote in message ... Oh, yeah, thats because Jumos sucked ![]() Well, you're sorta right Gord. The problem with Jumos was that after about 5 hours or so they *stopped* sucking..... :^) The CO |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B2431" The U.S. built and flew a few disc aircraft during WW2. The Chance Vought V-173 first flew 23 November 1942, which had excellent STOL capabilities and was apparently impossible to stall. AVRO Canada experimented with a flying saucer type design in the 1950s. This was funded in part by the USAF. It was known as the Avrocar. It was abandoned as I guess technology had not been developed (i.e. computer flight control systems etc) for controlling successful flight. Do a search with 'google' for "AVRO Flying Saucer" if you want to read more about this project. Ed Majden |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"B2431"
The U.S. built and flew a few disc aircraft during WW2. The Chance Vought V-173 first flew 23 November 1942, which had excellent STOL capabilities and was apparently impossible to stall. Thats impossible, since WW2 had not ended yet, and therefore we had not had the chance to steal the Nazi Uber-technology, which was of course the only way us American simpletons could have ever had developed it. ![]() Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Majden" wrote in message news ![]() "B2431" The U.S. built and flew a few disc aircraft during WW2. The Chance Vought V-173 first flew 23 November 1942, which had excellent STOL capabilities and was apparently impossible to stall. AVRO Canada experimented with a flying saucer type design in the 1950s. This was funded in part by the USAF. It was known as the Avrocar. It was abandoned as I guess technology had not been developed (i.e. computer flight control systems etc) for controlling successful flight. Do a search with 'google' for "AVRO Flying Saucer" if you want to read more about this project. Ed Majden One of those is on display at the Ft. Eustis, Virginia, Transportation Museum. http://www.avroarrow.org/Avrocar/Avrocar3.html http://www.davidpride.com/Army/us_ft_eustis_04.htm Pete |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |