![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories
are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. -robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
... I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. What workload permitting means is the controller doesn't have the option of denying traffic advisories so long as his/her workload permits. If you look at the practical side of it, a controller can be very busy one minute and mostly idle the next, so does that mean a controller must add more workload by cancelling FF for each and every aircraft when they may be soon idle? Most controllers aren't going to, and I can't say I would want them to anyway. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary writes:
I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. The controller is not required to call out all traffic, and may not be able to. The pilot should always assume that there may be traffic nearby that the controller cannot point out. This is mentioned in the pilot/controller glossary of the 7710 under Traffic Advisories: "Traffic advisory service will be provided to the extent possible depending on higher priority duties of the controller or other limitations; e.g., radar limitations, volume of traffic, frequency congestion, or controller workload. Radar/ nonradar traffic advisories do not relieve the pilot of his/her responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft. Pilots are cautioned that there are many times when the controller is not able to give traffic advisories concerning all traffic in the aircraft's proximity; in other words, when a pilot requests or is receiving traffic advisories, he/she should not assume that all traffic will be issued." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Robert M. Gary writes: I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. The controller is not required to call out all traffic, and may not be able to. The pilot should always assume that there may be traffic nearby that the controller cannot point out. This is mentioned in the pilot/controller glossary of the 7710 under Traffic Advisories: "Traffic advisory service will be provided to the extent possible depending on higher priority duties of the controller or other limitations; e.g., radar limitations, volume of traffic, frequency congestion, or controller workload. Radar/ nonradar traffic advisories do not relieve the pilot of his/her responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft. Pilots are cautioned that there are many times when the controller is not able to give traffic advisories concerning all traffic in the aircraft's proximity; in other words, when a pilot requests or is receiving traffic advisories, he/she should not assume that all traffic will be issued." It doesn't matter if your just flying a desk retard. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5 by 5 luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Robert M. Gary writes: I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. The controller is not required to call out all traffic, and may not be able to. The pilot should always assume that there may be traffic nearby that the controller cannot point out. This is mentioned in the pilot/controller glossary of the 7710 under Traffic Advisories: "Traffic advisory service will be provided to the extent possible depending on higher priority duties of the controller or other limitations; e.g., radar limitations, volume of traffic, frequency congestion, or controller workload. Radar/ nonradar traffic advisories do not relieve the pilot of his/her responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft. Pilots are cautioned that there are many times when the controller is not able to give traffic advisories concerning all traffic in the aircraft's proximity; in other words, when a pilot requests or is receiving traffic advisories, he/she should not assume that all traffic will be issued." It doesn't matter if your just flying a desk retard. Oh come on now. While not by any means a MX defender, if he answers a question with a valid reference, that should be that and the insults reserved for when he goes off into pontificate mode. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... 5 by 5 luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote: "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Robert M. Gary writes: I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. The controller is not required to call out all traffic, and may not be able to. The pilot should always assume that there may be traffic nearby that the controller cannot point out. This is mentioned in the pilot/controller glossary of the 7710 under Traffic Advisories: "Traffic advisory service will be provided to the extent possible depending on higher priority duties of the controller or other limitations; e.g., radar limitations, volume of traffic, frequency congestion, or controller workload. Radar/ nonradar traffic advisories do not relieve the pilot of his/her responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft. Pilots are cautioned that there are many times when the controller is not able to give traffic advisories concerning all traffic in the aircraft's proximity; in other words, when a pilot requests or is receiving traffic advisories, he/she should not assume that all traffic will be issued." It doesn't matter if your just flying a desk retard. Oh come on now. While not by any means a MX defender, if he answers a question with a valid reference, that should be that and the insults reserved for when he goes off into pontificate mode. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. Preemptive strike. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
: wrote in message ... 5 by 5 luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote: "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Robert M. Gary writes: I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. The controller is not required to call out all traffic, and may not be able to. The pilot should always assume that there may be traffic nearby that the controller cannot point out. This is mentioned in the pilot/controller glossary of the 7710 under Traffic Advisories: "Traffic advisory service will be provided to the extent possible depending on higher priority duties of the controller or other limitations; e.g., radar limitations, volume of traffic, frequency congestion, or controller workload. Radar/ nonradar traffic advisories do not relieve the pilot of his/her responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft. Pilots are cautioned that there are many times when the controller is not able to give traffic advisories concerning all traffic in the aircraft's proximity; in other words, when a pilot requests or is receiving traffic advisories, he/she should not assume that all traffic will be issued." It doesn't matter if your just flying a desk retard. Oh come on now. While not by any means a MX defender, if he answers a question with a valid reference, that should be that and the insults reserved for when he goes off into pontificate mode. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. Preemptive strike. Snort! bertie |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Bunyip Slayer luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote:
Preemptive strike. Is that they way you act towards your kids when they do something right? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
: wrote in message ... 5 by 5 luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote: "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Robert M. Gary writes: I know that the AIM tell us that class E airspace traffic advisories are given to VFR aircraft on a workload basis. However, I seem to recall some of our controller friends saying that as long as an aircraft is currently being given flight following the controller must either advise traffic or cancel the flight following. I'm looking for this type of language in the 7110 but I'm not seeing it. The controller is not required to call out all traffic, and may not be able to. The pilot should always assume that there may be traffic nearby that the controller cannot point out. This is mentioned in the pilot/controller glossary of the 7710 under Traffic Advisories: "Traffic advisory service will be provided to the extent possible depending on higher priority duties of the controller or other limitations; e.g., radar limitations, volume of traffic, frequency congestion, or controller workload. Radar/ nonradar traffic advisories do not relieve the pilot of his/her responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft. Pilots are cautioned that there are many times when the controller is not able to give traffic advisories concerning all traffic in the aircraft's proximity; in other words, when a pilot requests or is receiving traffic advisories, he/she should not assume that all traffic will be issued." It doesn't matter if your just flying a desk retard. Oh come on now. While not by any means a MX defender, if he answers a question with a valid reference, that should be that and the insults reserved for when he goes off into pontificate mode. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. Preemptive strike. And well justified in Anthony's case. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Traffic? | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 8 | October 19th 05 09:52 PM |
Traffic 2004 vs Ultimate Traffic | Tlewis95 | Simulators | 3 | August 13th 04 05:39 AM |
VFR Advisories Around DC | Scott Lowrey | Piloting | 4 | June 9th 04 04:41 PM |
Study pilot workload during approach and landing | Freshfighter | Piloting | 5 | December 7th 03 04:06 PM |
Traffic help | Steven P. McNicoll | Piloting | 0 | November 12th 03 07:56 PM |