![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For those of you who haven't seen it, try my B-58 Hustler home page link
below. Make sure you click on the ANNEX link. That's 3 pages of pictures and data on the Hustler. Don't forget to sign the new Guest Book. -- B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article jin9c.9912$wl1.8157@fed1read06, Darrell
wrote: For those of you who haven't seen it, try my B-58 Hustler home page link below. Make sure you click on the ANNEX link. That's 3 pages of pictures and data on the Hustler. Don't forget to sign the new Guest Book. I have been keeping track of all of the retired B-58's that are still in existance. http://www.johnweeks.com/b58. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice links, John,
I'll mark that site for use. -- B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - "John A. Weeks III" wrote in message ... In article jin9c.9912$wl1.8157@fed1read06, Darrell wrote: For those of you who haven't seen it, try my B-58 Hustler home page link below. Make sure you click on the ANNEX link. That's 3 pages of pictures and data on the Hustler. Don't forget to sign the new Guest Book. I have been keeping track of all of the retired B-58's that are still in existance. http://www.johnweeks.com/b58. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Low level flight. Back then, in the early 60s, there were no
restrictions on VFR low level, other than stay out of airport control zones, towns, and obey the general altitude restrictions. We used to fly cross country low level - lead doing the nav and wing watching for traffic. Down at 500 AGL and (usually) 360KIAS (for time - miles per gallon was pretty much the same at 360/420) there was very seldom anybody to be seen. We used to go into base ops, look at the weather map for a nice big H, grab a stack of ONC charts, tear off a four inch wide strip along the route, tape them together, draw the course line, put time and mileage marks on them and off we'd go. BTW a clean 104A could go 400 nm on the deck with plenty of fuel left. Later on the USAF made us file IFR and that did away (mostly) with the informal low levels. Walt BJ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Poker Deck routes were low level VFR routes while Oil Burner (later Olive
Branch) routes were the IFR ones. Even the OB routes had VFR segments for terrain avoidance radar practice. I flew those in the B-52H. In the B-58 we also had high speed segments which we flew at 600 KIAS. -- B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - "WaltBJ" wrote in message m... Low level flight. Back then, in the early 60s, there were no restrictions on VFR low level, other than stay out of airport control zones, towns, and obey the general altitude restrictions. We used to fly cross country low level - lead doing the nav and wing watching for traffic. Down at 500 AGL and (usually) 360KIAS (for time - miles per gallon was pretty much the same at 360/420) there was very seldom anybody to be seen. We used to go into base ops, look at the weather map for a nice big H, grab a stack of ONC charts, tear off a four inch wide strip along the route, tape them together, draw the course line, put time and mileage marks on them and off we'd go. BTW a clean 104A could go 400 nm on the deck with plenty of fuel left. Later on the USAF made us file IFR and that did away (mostly) with the informal low levels. Walt BJ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darrell wrote:
B-58 we also had high speed segments which we flew at 600 KIAS. Darrell, how did the B-58 ride at 600KIAS down low? The B-57 would crack your head on the canopy bouncing along at 360 on a hot day, near 500' AGL At least we were going slow enough to read the names of the towns as we went by............. Rick Clark MFE |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/
Darrell wrote: B-58 we also had high speed segments which we flew at 600 KIAS. Darrell, how did the B-58 ride at 600KIAS down low? The B-57 would crack your head on the canopy bouncing along at 360 on a hot day, near 500' AGL At least we were going slow enough to read the names of the towns as we went by............. It flew pretty smooth, Rick. With the delta wing it seemed like it cut through the turbulence. Sort of like water skiing. With 2 skis you feel every ripple. With a single slalom ski it bites deeper into the water and dampens out lots of the surface turbulence. With moderate turbulence we'd get an occasional slap-bang but not very bad. This, at a time when B-52s were aborting the route due to turbulence. Rick Clark MFE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B-58 Hustler | Darrell | Military Aviation | 10 | February 23rd 04 06:14 PM |
B-58 Hustler site | Darrell | Military Aviation | 16 | November 8th 03 12:55 AM |
Aerofax B-58 Hustler volume signed by test pilots | Tim V | Military Aviation | 4 | September 8th 03 04:04 PM |