![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Veedubber dont worry too much about vaughn. I dont know why he carries
on so much. the topic of this post is to make you aware of a set of free downloadable plans for a modern incarnation of the old primary glider. have a look at Mike Sandlin's pages on the "Goat" http://home.att.net/~mikesandlin/g4doc.htm this is a flight proven design judging by the details posted. at the bottom of the page are links to 4 other primary style gliders. from my google searching over the past few nights Mike Sandelin has achieved a unique status in all of the internet. His are the only glider plans available free and downloadable from the internet. Mike you're a champion. I salute your effort. Stealth Pilot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 22, 7:18*am, Stealth Pilot
wrote: Veedubber dont worry too much about vaughn. I dont know why he carries on so much. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Stealth, You appear to have misinterpreted something I've written. I worry about having cancer. I worry about a rattlesnake getting into the patio and being discovered by the grandkids. I worry about a government that is unresponsive to the voice of the people. But I don't worry about people on the internet. There's simply too many truly important things to worry about. Any proposal worthy of mention will garner some amount of negative comment, which is generally good since it usually serves to IMPROVE the proposal. But there's nothing to be gained by treating such comments as a PERSONAL attack. And even when it is, the most suitable response is none at all. This isn't a case of sugar vs vinegar -- we've all got enough flies in our lives. Acceptance of a proposal requires the proposal to stand on its own two feet -- to be accepted on its merits. The basic problem is the decline of general aviation in America, especially in the area of grass-roots aviation, where the people who want to fly simply can't afford to do so. A proposal involving Primary Gliders as a starting point, followed by a simple two-place trainer powered by an industrial engine has, in my opinion, enough merit to justify itself. Perhaps not immediately but at some point in the future. That's because the situation that gave rise to such a proposal to begin with is not only still with us, it is getting worse. The 'official' solution whipped up by the bureaucrats in the EAA is proving to be just another high-priced boon-doggle. The people who wanted to fly before the SLA debacle are still with us -- and still just as far from flying as they were before. Once people realize that an imported airplane costing over a hundred thousand dollars does not address the basic problem I'm sure the proposal for Primary Gliders and Pietenpol trainers will gain more support. When that support reaches a certain Critical Mass we will begin to see it being adopted by EAA Chapters. History shows that such a program was an effective means of training pilots. Once the modern version of such a program shows that it's capable of producing the same results, I've a hunch it will be adopted by the EAA. (Because if they don't get onboard they'll soon find themselves reduced to little more than an air-show organizer. But I don't worry about Vaughn. Nor about you :-) I see you both as allies in this effort. -R.S.Hoover |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:25:39 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: On Sep 22, 7:18*am, Stealth Pilot History shows that such a program was an effective means of training pilots. Once the modern version of such a program shows that it's capable of producing the same results, I've a hunch it will be adopted by the EAA. (Because if they don't get onboard they'll soon find themselves reduced to little more than an air-show organizer. But I don't worry about Vaughn. Nor about you :-) I see you both as allies in this effort. -R.S.Hoover ok so I'm the snake under the verandah here. I post with a nom de plume because the discussions arent about me (or any other ego) they are about aviation. if we kept it that way it'd be good. the GOAT ! ....remember the GOAT. that design uses modern materials. it appears to my eye to have overcome one of the faults of the original primary glider in that it isnt carrying surplus weight. this means that the thing can fly slow enough that momentum doesnt enter into the crash equation. it has full 3 axis control and can loaf along at 23 miles per hour. it strikes me that such a design *could* be built reasonably cheaply. if you had some built and you had a hill and a breeze and a bunch of kids you could be set up for an afternoon of really fun flying. personally if it cant do a hundred knots I'm usually not interested but when I was perusing the details it struck me that the guy has achieved something quite noteworthy. he has actually achieved a competent light weight minimal design. my engineering eye was quite impressed. the other thing that impressed me was that he had the balls to present usable sketches of his work as a free zip download. I really think that kids *would* be interested in this modern incarnation of the primary glider whereas they would probably turn their noses up at a vintage design. kids being kids. it is worth checking out! Stealth Pilot |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Howard aka "Stealth Pilot" wrote in message ... | On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:25:39 -0700 (PDT), " | wrote: | | | ok so I'm the snake under the verandah here. I post with a nom de | plume because the discussions arent about me (or any other ego) they | are about aviation. if we kept it that way it'd be good. | | the GOAT ! ....remember the GOAT. | | that design uses modern materials. it appears to my eye to have | overcome one of the faults of the original primary glider in that it | isnt carrying surplus weight. this means that the thing can fly slow | enough that momentum doesnt enter into the crash equation. it has full | 3 axis control and can loaf along at 23 miles per hour. | | it strikes me that such a design *could* be built reasonably cheaply. | if you had some built and you had a hill and a breeze and a bunch of | kids you could be set up for an afternoon of really fun flying. | | personally if it cant do a hundred knots I'm usually not interested | but when I was perusing the details it struck me that the guy has | achieved something quite noteworthy. he has actually achieved a | competent light weight minimal design. my engineering eye was quite | impressed. | | the other thing that impressed me was that he had the balls to present | usable sketches of his work as a free zip download. | | I really think that kids *would* be interested in this modern | incarnation of the primary glider whereas they would probably turn | their noses up at a vintage design. kids being kids. | | it is worth checking out! | Stealth Pilot | | | | Yeah, but you still think brakes are not designed to stop and aircraft. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PRIMARY GLIDERS | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | September 21st 08 08:40 PM |
primary flight instruments on partial panel | Greg | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 1st 06 04:18 AM |
Primary nav source | Wizard of Draws | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | December 21st 05 07:11 AM |
Need to rent an a/c for primary training | Briand200 | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 28th 04 04:40 PM |
IR written Primary/Secondary instrument questions | Jeremy | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | February 20th 04 11:02 PM |