![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesterday's instrument approach workout and it was a mental workout!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RChXbsb-gUc ILS approaches over at HKS Hawkins Jackson MS and VOR Alpha back to Madison. True workout which I only made it on top of the overcast for a blissful 30 seconds and the entire flight other then take off and landing was in solid IMC. Amazing when a little light turbulence is tossed in how much it adds to the workload. Winds at 2000 feet were running 20 knots, and on the surface was running 5 to 10 knots, which made for harder tracking of the localizer. I really can appreciate that need to be knocking out approaches once a week as it had been three weeks since I had done approaches and I really felt rusty. Again could have been conditions upping the anti while IMC but I was really whipped mentally. The approaches once I broke out in VMC, I went visual and didn't maintain glide slope down to the middle marker, as I needed the "break" of scanning at the gauges, so yes, my approaches will be below VASI / PAPI indications once I knew I had the runway made. I included times "edited out" so one can get a feel how much in gaps I cut out which in the full scheme of things wasn't that long on my descents.. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberma wrote:
Yesterday's instrument approach workout and it was a mental workout! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RChXbsb-gUc ILS approaches over at HKS Hawkins Jackson MS and VOR Alpha back to Madison. True workout which I only made it on top of the overcast for a blissful 30 seconds and the entire flight other then take off and landing was in solid IMC. Amazing when a little light turbulence is tossed in how much it adds to the workload. Winds at 2000 feet were running 20 knots, and on the surface was running 5 to 10 knots, which made for harder tracking of the localizer. I really can appreciate that need to be knocking out approaches once a week as it had been three weeks since I had done approaches and I really felt rusty. Again could have been conditions upping the anti while IMC but I was really whipped mentally. The approaches once I broke out in VMC, I went visual and didn't maintain glide slope down to the middle marker, as I needed the "break" of scanning at the gauges, so yes, my approaches will be below VASI / PAPI indications once I knew I had the runway made. I included times "edited out" so one can get a feel how much in gaps I cut out which in the full scheme of things wasn't that long on my descents.. What software did you use to edit the video and add titles, etc? -- Joe Chisolm Marble Falls, Tx. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Chisolm" wrote in message m... A Lieberma wrote: Yesterday's instrument approach workout and it was a mental workout! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RChXbsb-gUc ILS approaches over at HKS Hawkins Jackson MS and VOR Alpha back to Madison. True workout which I only made it on top of the overcast for a blissful 30 seconds and the entire flight other then take off and landing was in solid IMC. Amazing when a little light turbulence is tossed in how much it adds to the workload. Winds at 2000 feet were running 20 knots, and on the surface was running 5 to 10 knots, which made for harder tracking of the localizer. I really can appreciate that need to be knocking out approaches once a week as it had been three weeks since I had done approaches and I really felt rusty. Again could have been conditions upping the anti while IMC but I was really whipped mentally. The approaches once I broke out in VMC, I went visual and didn't maintain glide slope down to the middle marker, as I needed the "break" of scanning at the gauges, so yes, my approaches will be below VASI / PAPI indications once I knew I had the runway made. I included times "edited out" so one can get a feel how much in gaps I cut out which in the full scheme of things wasn't that long on my descents.. What software did you use to edit the video and add titles, etc? He uses MS Movie Maker that comes with Windows Kobra |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 4:36*pm, "Kobra" wrote:
What software did you use to edit the video and add titles, etc? He uses MS Movie Maker that comes with Windows Yep! Minimal learning curve. Hardest part (and probably with any video editing software) is learning the transitions and timing of the transitions. Hopefully this time next week, I will have my digital recording device along with a "patch cord" I ordered yesterday so my ATC comms will be included in future videos. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yesterday's instrument approaches - video | [email protected] | Piloting | 5 | October 17th 08 06:49 PM |
BFR yesterday; first instrument approaches! | Michael Ware | Piloting | 4 | May 15th 06 04:34 PM |
GUMPS/Instrument approaches | gatt | Piloting | 21 | February 2nd 05 08:53 PM |
Challenging instrument approaches? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | December 1st 03 06:04 PM |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |