![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am rebuilding the wings on my Merlin. My intent was to use the old
foam rib cores as templates but they differ from rib to rib, clearly some have been replaced, not to mention some really shoddy workmanship, warped ribs, broken ribs etc. So I search the web for the airfoil type and find that it is supposed to be a Clark Y. Simple enough I print out a Clark Y from Profili, not even close. So I measure the thickness and find that a Clark Y15 has the right thickness but still not even close to my ribs on the aft part of the upper camber. The upper part of my ribs are nearly straight from about 10% behind the spar back. My suspicion is either remarkably careless building or errors carried forward on the factory template. It is much easier to make the upper cap strips this way ie straight, no camber. So the question is, do I go with the Profili Clark Y, or perhaps the NACA 4412 or ? My only hesitation on the Clark Y is the affect of the trailing suspended ailerons on the Clark Y. Most of the Clark Y applications had the ailerons built into the wing. I called the Merlin Factory they said just use the old ribs. Thanks, Zac |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... I am rebuilding the wings on my Merlin. My intent was to use the old foam rib cores as templates but they differ from rib to rib, clearly some have been replaced, not to mention some really shoddy workmanship, warped ribs, broken ribs etc. So I search the web for the airfoil type and find that it is supposed to be a Clark Y. Simple enough I print out a Clark Y from Profili, not even close. So I measure the thickness and find that a Clark Y15 has the right thickness but still not even close to my ribs on the aft part of the upper camber. The upper part of my ribs are nearly straight from about 10% behind the spar back. My suspicion is either remarkably careless building or errors carried forward on the factory template. It is much easier to make the upper cap strips this way ie straight, no camber. So the question is, do I go with the Profili Clark Y, or perhaps the NACA 4412 or ? My only hesitation on the Clark Y is the affect of the trailing suspended ailerons on the Clark Y. Most of the Clark Y applications had the ailerons built into the wing. I called the Merlin Factory they said just use the old ribs. Wouldn't be the first time that a designer straightened out part of an airfoil to simplify construction. If you want it to fly the same, use the same modified Clark Y that, from your description, it seems to be. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:23:01 -0500, "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea
Hawk @See My Sig.com wrote: wrote in message ... I am rebuilding the wings on my Merlin. My intent was to use the old foam rib cores as templates but they differ from rib to rib, clearly some have been replaced, not to mention some really shoddy workmanship, warped ribs, broken ribs etc. So I search the web for the airfoil type and find that it is supposed to be a Clark Y. Simple enough I print out a Clark Y from Profili, not even close. So I measure the thickness and find that a Clark Y15 has the right thickness but still not even close to my ribs on the aft part of the upper camber. The upper part of my ribs are nearly straight from about 10% behind the spar back. My suspicion is either remarkably careless building or errors carried forward on the factory template. It is much easier to make the upper cap strips this way ie straight, no camber. So the question is, do I go with the Profili Clark Y, or perhaps the NACA 4412 or ? My only hesitation on the Clark Y is the affect of the trailing suspended ailerons on the Clark Y. Most of the Clark Y applications had the ailerons built into the wing. I called the Merlin Factory they said just use the old ribs. Wouldn't be the first time that a designer straightened out part of an airfoil to simplify construction. If you want it to fly the same, use the same modified Clark Y that, from your description, it seems to be. the 4417 is the clark Y with the ordinates from the chordline instead of the under surface. the whole 44xx family is the same clark Y aerofoil just thickened up or thinned down. pick the one you are happiest with. Stealth Pilot |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Key Figure in USS Liberty Inquiry Dies | NOMOREWARFORISRAEL[_2_] | Naval Aviation | 8 | June 24th 08 12:23 AM |
Explanation please; Figure 4-42, 43.14-1B | mhorowit | Home Built | 4 | August 29th 07 02:35 PM |
Wings, Wires, and Watercolors - Deperoussin Monoplane 1911 Type.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 1st 07 04:14 AM |
Wings, Wires, and Watercolors - Breguet Biplane 1910 Military type.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 1st 07 04:13 AM |
IFR training, figure B | Hannibal | Piloting | 9 | October 31st 03 12:25 AM |