![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is the latest flying car.
http://www.news-gazette.com/news/pri...y_taking _off If it used anti-gravity would probably be a winner. Big John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tech Support wrote in message ... Here is the latest flying car. http://www.news-gazette.com/news/pri...y_taking _off If it used anti-gravity would probably be a winner. Yet another proof that the idea results in a vehicle which is both a crappy car and a crappy airplane. I'm sure it won't be the last. -- Dan T182T at 4R4 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
-b- wrote: The latest flying car may indeed be both a crappy car and a crappy plane, but that's not the problem. Plenty of people drive crappy cars and get plenty of utility out of them without even being able to fly, and plenty of others fly crappy planes that are not roadable and still don't complain. Oh, I think that it's part of the problem, anyway. If it were a crappy car and a crappy plane *and cost as much as one*, that would be fine. The trouble is that you're spending enough to get a *good* car and a *good* plane and *another* good car at your destination, and the result is a crappy car and a crappy plane. Maybe I'm missing something, but I feel the utility of a flying car today is about comparable to that of a quick-release bathtub. This part is certainly a big problem as well, though! -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The latest flying car may indeed be both a crappy car and a crappy plane, but
that's not the problem. Plenty of people drive crappy cars and get plenty of utility out of them without even being able to fly, and plenty of others fly crappy planes that are not roadable and still don't complain. The main problem is that the car/plane will have to take off from airport runways and park in car parking spaces. Perhaps in the 1950's it was possible to imagine a car/plane that would take off from the local school baseball field with the whole community waving you off (holding balloons and licking ice-cream cones), but try mentioning today bringing a flying vehicle anywhere near a school, or any other populated area! So, you have to use airports. By the time you've driven your crappy car to the airport, gotten permissions, gotten the gate open and onto the airfield, gotten out and done your pre-flight you haven't really saved any time compared to getting a cab to the airport to get into a real airplane. And here's where the crappy plane scenario comes in, because now you're going to lose any time you may have gained because of your slow cruise speed. In other words, they've invented a cell phone that you have to go to a phone booth to use! On the other end of the equation, you land and get out of the airport - now what are you going to do? Drive into town? Park it at a meter? In a parking lot? What do you do when someone bumps into it, or even opens their door into your plane? Get it appraised? Have an A&P opinion before flying? What about when they break in to steal all the avionics? Happens every day to car owners who have nothing other than a radio, so it will obviously happen to a basket full of goodies like a flying car. Basically, anything you fly in has no business leaving the protected environment of the airport. Maybe I'm missing something, but I feel the utility of a flying car today is about comparable to that of a quick-release bathtub. In article , says... Tech Support wrote in message .. . Here is the latest flying car. http://www.news-gazette.com/news/pri...s_create_car_t hats_literally_taking_off If it used anti-gravity would probably be a winner. Yet another proof that the idea results in a vehicle which is both a crappy car and a crappy airplane. I'm sure it won't be the last. -- Dan T182T at 4R4 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "-b-" wrote: The latest flying car may indeed be both a crappy car and a crappy plane, but that's not the problem. Plenty of people drive crappy cars Not as crappy as the Terrafugia. plenty of others fly crappy planes Not as crappy as the Terrafugia. -- Dan "How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!" -Chief Inspector Dreyfus |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 10:44*pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"-b-" wrote: The latest flying car may indeed be both a crappy car and a crappy plane, but that's not the problem. Plenty of people drive crappy cars Not as crappy as the Terrafugia. *plenty of others fly *crappy planes Not as crappy as the Terrafugia. -- Dan "How can an idiot be a policeman? *Answer me that!" -Chief Inspector Dreyfus Speking of questionable design (aka "crappy"), take a look at the photo. It seems to me that is a LOT of up elevator for an airplane that''s just taken off. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Latest US E175 | Digital Voices | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 6th 07 06:43 PM |
Latest trip | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 26th 07 12:23 PM |
Latest take on Cunningham | Vox Populi | Naval Aviation | 4 | December 9th 05 01:28 AM |
Latest Blackhawks down | miso | Military Aviation | 7 | November 18th 03 08:26 AM |
Latest Newsletter | Michael Coates | Soaring | 3 | July 15th 03 10:04 PM |