![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The US had more than a thousand F-4s, along with scads more
A-4, F-101s and so on. Obviously some went to museums. But where are the rest? And if they are sitting in a desert somewhere, what's their condition. Basically, could someone with a lot of money build themselves an old airforce out of what's available, or has everything been scrapped? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ... The US had more than a thousand F-4s, along with scads more A-4, F-101s and so on. Obviously some went to museums. But where are the rest? And if they are sitting in a desert somewhere, what's their condition. The F-101's were scrapped or sent to museums long ago. Some of the A-4's recently (within the last three or four years) were sold off to the Brazilians, IIRC, after some rebuild and modification work. I'd guess a fair number of F-4's are still at AMARC, but a fair number have ended up as QF-4's, getting shot at by various fighters and air defense systems. As did a fair number of the F-102's before them (and some F-106's IIRC?). Basically, could someone with a lot of money build themselves an old airforce out of what's available, or has everything been scrapped? AMARC reutilizes what it can; they generate spares for aircraft still in service, and sometimes they regenerate the aircraft themselves for either domestic or foreign service. There are some law enforcement organizations that fly aircraft that went through AMARC; I believe the remaining C-130's flying in civilian hands in the firefighting role are also AMARC veterans. The USAF is, from what I have read, putting a few of the B-1B's that were sent into storage a year or two ago back into service. When their utility is at an end, AMARC disposes of the remains to the scrapdealers. Brooks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The F-101's were scrapped or sent to museums long ago. Some of the A-4's
recently (within the last three or four years) were sold off to the Brazilians, IIRC, after some rebuild and modification work. I'd guess a fair number of F-4's are still at AMARC, but a fair number have ended up as QF-4's, getting shot at by various fighters and air defense systems. As did a fair number of the F-102's before them (and some F-106's IIRC?). The F-4s that were in the best condition (last to be retired) were the first ones to be used as drones. They are about out of F-4Gs I think, and are probably onto the Es now. Ron PA-31T Cheyenne II Maharashtra Weather Modification Program Pune, India |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... AMARC reutilizes what it can; they generate spares for aircraft still in service, and sometimes they regenerate the aircraft themselves for either domestic or foreign service. Yes. Several sets of F-111 wings and other structural parts have been sold to the RAAF under the F-111 Sole Operator Program for some ridiculously low price, but are kept in the warm dry air of AMARC until we need them. They may be getting our TAP-3s to look after too, as they have been withdrawn from service. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Charles Talleyrand
wrote: Basically, could someone with a lot of money build themselves an old airforce out of what's available, or has everything been scrapped? The airframes of combat aircraft that are sent to storage are "de-mil'ed" prior to being allowed into civilian hands. It is getting more and more rare for former combat planes to be released given that people have tried to put them back into active flying condition. Non-combat aircraft are still regularly sold to the public. Common uses are as cargo transport and firefighting. Some folks have built flying fighter jets from spare parts. In these cases, they did not use US military airframes. Rather, they either got a hold of spare parts, tooling spares from the manufacture that were to be scrapped, or parts from jets sold to foriegn countries. The most famous of these is the F-104 that set the low level speed record that was built by Darryl Greenamyer. The problem with allowing combat aircraft into private hands began when an unqualified pilot attempted to fly a privately owned F-86 Saber Jet out of the Fresno airport. He botched the take-off, and crashed into an ice cream stand killing a number of children who were standing in line for ice cream on a hot California afternoon. Not good. Not good at all. While one should question why an ice cream stand was built at the end of a shared military/commercial runway, dead kids does not make good publicity. Even with all the now strict rules, funny stuff does still happen. Case in point is the F-18 Hornet that showed up on E-bay last year. It was a former Blue Angels aircraft that had not been demiled. In fact, with some standard maintenance work, it could have been put back into the air. I don't know if the full story was ever revealed on how that airplane ended up in private hands. The most likely speculation that I heard is that someone had a airplane that the National Museum Of Naval Aviation wanted badly enough, and they traded the Hornet in near working condition to get their museum piece. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron" wrote in message ... The F-101's were scrapped or sent to museums long ago. Some of the A-4's recently (within the last three or four years) were sold off to the Brazilians, IIRC, after some rebuild and modification work. I'd guess a fair number of F-4's are still at AMARC, but a fair number have ended up as QF-4's, getting shot at by various fighters and air defense systems. As did a fair number of the F-102's before them (and some F-106's IIRC?). The F-4s that were in the best condition (last to be retired) were the first ones to be used as drones. They are about out of F-4Gs I think, and are probably onto the Es now. Something I read recently pointed to a decline in QF-4 mods in the near term; wouldn't be surprised to start seeing some QF-16's from the early blocks (10 and 15) in the near future. Brooks Ron |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John A. Weeks III" wrote in message ... The problem with allowing combat aircraft into private hands began when an unqualified pilot attempted to fly a privately owned F-86 Saber Jet out of the Fresno airport. He botched the take-off, and crashed into an ice cream stand killing a number of children who were standing in line for ice cream on a hot California afternoon. Not good. Not good at all. The fact that it was a fighter is IMO irrelevant, as you said the pilot wasn't qualified to fly it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Old Planes...Where Are They Now
From: "Charles Talleyrand" Date: 6/21/04 9:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: The US had more than a thousand F-4s, along with scads more A-4, F-101s and so on. Obviously some went to museums. But where are the rest? And if they are sitting in a desert somewhere, what's their condition. Basically, could someone with a lot of money build themselves an old airforce out of what's available, or has everything been scrapped? To see one resting place of old planes go to my website and read, "In Remembrance of Willie the Wolf". Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Old Planes...Where Are They Now
From: "Neil Gerace" Date: 6/22/04 6:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: "John A. Weeks III" wrote in message ... The problem with allowing combat aircraft into private hands began when an unqualified pilot attempted to fly a privately owned F-86 Saber Jet out of the Fresno airport. He botched the take-off, and crashed into an ice cream stand killing a number of children who were standing in line for ice cream on a hot California afternoon. Not good. Not good at all. The fact that it was a fighter is IMO irrelevant, as you said the pilot wasn't qualified to fly it. The B-26 Martin Marauder is a case in point. Every one that has ever been rebuilt to date has crashed killing all aboard.incliding the one that the CAF rebuilt and flew. The pilot had heavy hours in Marauders. But not recently and for all prectical purposes was unqualifed because he wans't current. If I had a chance to fly in a Marauder today, would I? Not a chance in hell. Been there. Done that. And 1100 hours in that beast is more than enough. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:27:38 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote: "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ... The US had more than a thousand F-4s, along with scads more A-4, F-101s and so on. Obviously some went to museums. But where are the rest? And if they are sitting in a desert somewhere, what's their condition. The F-101's were scrapped or sent to museums long ago. Some of the A-4's recently (within the last three or four years) were sold off to the Brazilians, IIRC, after some rebuild and modification work. I'd guess a fair number of F-4's are still at AMARC, but a fair number have ended up as QF-4's, getting shot at by various fighters and air defense systems. As did a fair number of the F-102's before them (and some F-106's IIRC?). The drone program was remarkable to watch while I was at Holloman. During the four years I was doing Fighter Lead-In, I watched the F-102, the F-100, the F-106 and the beginnings of the F-4 programs. (My favorite was the F-100 which came with the call-sign "Attila"....think about it.) They even had a few F-86s when I started. The aircraft in Q configuration could be flown by a pilot on board, remotely with a pilot on board safety observer, and full remote (obviously the favored approach for target duty!) They were operated remotely from a ground station as well as from a chase aircraft. The ground operator was used for T/O and recovery and was in a mobile console, mounted on a truck chassis and positioned on the centerline of the runway to aid in approach and departure lineup. When flown remotely, they aircraft had an emergency destruct package which necessitated some minimum safe runway clearance procedures. If there were any possibilty of damage to a Q on a target mission the drone would be destroyed over the range, rather than attempting recovery. Saw lots of old bits and pieces out on the White Sands Missile Range around Mockingbird Gap when I used to go quail hunting out there. Got lots of chance to watch the operations from the tower or the Supervisor of Flying truck. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 30th 04 11:16 AM |
Red Alert: Terrorist build kamikaze planes for attacks | Hank Higgens | Home Built | 5 | April 16th 04 02:10 PM |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 15th 04 06:17 AM |
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 12:17 AM |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 03 04:43 AM |