A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A tower-induced go-round



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 29th 07, 05:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 897
Default A tower-induced go-round

Further, if you actually read the AIM, you see the patterns in 4-3-3
are recomnended, not mandatory.


.... as is the "local procedure"

Not following the local procedure, while not illegal, is at the
minimum discourteous, and at the worst, dangerous.


Ditto AIM.

If you have a problem with the concept, you need to grow up and learn
to play nicely with others as this has been around since the beginning
of aviation.


I have no problem playing nicely with others. I have a problem with
others telling me deciding for me what I should do, rather than letting
me decide for myself how I want to play nicely with others.

Or not.

Jose
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #2  
Old March 29th 07, 06:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default A tower-induced go-round

Jose wrote:
Further, if you actually read the AIM, you see the patterns in 4-3-3
are recomnended, not mandatory.


... as is the "local procedure"


Not following the local procedure, while not illegal, is at the
minimum discourteous, and at the worst, dangerous.


Ditto AIM.


If you have a problem with the concept, you need to grow up and learn
to play nicely with others as this has been around since the beginning
of aviation.


I have no problem playing nicely with others. I have a problem with
others telling me deciding for me what I should do, rather than letting
me decide for myself how I want to play nicely with others.


Or not.


Doing what the rest of the world expects you to do if there is no
overriding reason not to is the definition of playing nicely with
others.

Doing what you want just because it isn't illegal without any regard
for how it effects others is the definition of arrogance.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #3  
Old March 29th 07, 06:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 897
Default A tower-induced go-round

Doing what the rest of the world expects you to do if there is no
overriding reason not to is the definition of playing nicely with
others.


Except that in this case "The rest of the world" is just you.

Jose
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #4  
Old March 29th 07, 06:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default A tower-induced go-round

Jose wrote:
Doing what the rest of the world expects you to do if there is no
overriding reason not to is the definition of playing nicely with
others.


Except that in this case "The rest of the world" is just you.


In this case, "the rest of the world" is thousands of other pilots
over several decades, and that is just at one, small, airport.

If you expand that radius to 50 KM, you are now talking about tens
of thousands of pilots and a cumulative time of centuries.

It appears most people don't have a problem with the concept.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #5  
Old March 29th 07, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 897
Default A tower-induced go-round

If you expand that radius to 50 KM, you are now talking about tens
of thousands of pilots and a cumulative time of centuries.


Tens of thousands of pilots have subscribed to your local noise
procedure? They also subscribe to the idea that everyone must follow it
or unsafe conditions result?

Jose
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #6  
Old March 29th 07, 07:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default A tower-induced go-round

Jose wrote:
If you expand that radius to 50 KM, you are now talking about tens
of thousands of pilots and a cumulative time of centuries.


Tens of thousands of pilots have subscribed to your local noise
procedure? They also subscribe to the idea that everyone must follow it
or unsafe conditions result?


They aren't "my" procedures, nor are they the procedures of some mob of
home owners, they are the procedures established by the airport
management.

Airport management is the person or group responsible for the operation
of an airport.

What part of that are you having trouble understanding?

And yes, the vast majority of pilots follow the local airport procedures
because most pilots aren't arrogant, pig-headed, assholes.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #7  
Old March 31st 07, 06:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default A tower-induced go-round


wrote in message
...

They aren't "my" procedures, nor are they the procedures of some mob of
home owners, they are the procedures established by the airport
management.

Airport management is the person or group responsible for the operation
of an airport.


Airport management has no authority over airspace.


  #8  
Old March 29th 07, 07:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default A tower-induced go-round


jimp@specsol. wrote

Doing what you want just because it isn't illegal without any regard
for how it effects others is the definition of arrogance.


Funny how that definition fits a few of the posters in this group... to a
"T."
--
Jim in NC


  #9  
Old March 31st 07, 06:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default A tower-induced go-round


wrote in message
...

Doing what the rest of the world expects you to do if there is no
overriding reason not to is the definition of playing nicely with
others.


The rest of the world? The local CCB procedures have had very limited
distribution. You should expect most of the worlds pilots would not be
following them.


  #10  
Old March 31st 07, 07:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default A tower-induced go-round

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

wrote in message
...

Doing what the rest of the world expects you to do if there is no
overriding reason not to is the definition of playing nicely with
others.


The rest of the world? The local CCB procedures have had very limited
distribution. You should expect most of the worlds pilots would not be
following them.


So now you are down to nit picking the symantics?

The above text is about life in general, not about any particular
procedure or airport, or even aviation in particular.

As for CCB in particular, better than 99% of the pilots using CCB
for the past several decades follow the CCB VFR procedures.

And of course, pilots don't follow the CCB VFR procedures at other
airports.

This is you most childish rebuttal to date.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Round Engines john smith Piloting 20 February 15th 07 04:31 AM
induced airflow buttman Piloting 3 February 19th 06 05:36 AM
Round Engines Voxpopuli Naval Aviation 16 May 31st 05 07:48 PM
Source of Induced Drag Ken Kochanski Soaring 2 January 10th 04 01:18 AM
Predicting ground effects on induced power Marc Shorten Soaring 0 October 28th 03 12:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.