View Full Version : Piper Aztec - Alternator Conversion
Dean
July 25th 05, 01:16 PM
I have recently bought a 1960 Aztec with generators. Although these
have been overhauled recently, i'd rather have alternators installed.
I see InterAv have a generic kit. Has anyone installed this before?
What is the time to install, and any issues with particular brand?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Regards,
Dean
Jim Burns
July 25th 05, 08:47 PM
Sorry, I have no idea, but you may want to ask here:
http://piperchat.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=4
or here http://www.piperapacheclub.com/
Jim
Denny
July 26th 05, 12:32 PM
Is there a real need for the switch? The gennies have worked for 45
years... They are reliable... They don't go overvoltage and fry your
radios like an alternator can... Yes, they make less volts/current at
idle and low rpm, but you don't have to have everything turned on until
you roll onto the runway for take off... I have gennies still on Fat
Albert the Apache (1957) and looked hard at the alternator issue and
decided I was well off as is...
cheers ... denny
Dean
July 26th 05, 12:52 PM
Denny,
It's not that I particularly wanted to rid of the generators, just that
the existing maintenance company cant get them to work properly!! They
dont have a vested interest as i'm taking the a/c to another mtce
organisation.
The new mtce guy is like you and doesnt think I should be so quick to
dump them, but to troubleshoot the problems on the right generator
first.
Dean
Denny wrote:
> Is there a real need for the switch? The gennies have worked for 45
> years... They are reliable... They don't go overvoltage and fry your
> radios like an alternator can... Yes, they make less volts/current at
> idle and low rpm, but you don't have to have everything turned on until
> you roll onto the runway for take off... I have gennies still on Fat
> Albert the Apache (1957) and looked hard at the alternator issue and
> decided I was well off as is...
>
> cheers ... denny
Michael
July 26th 05, 07:07 PM
> They are reliable...
They are less reliable than alternators. Alternators have solid
commutators; generators have segmented ones - that's how a generator
makes DC. No diodes. Those segmented commutators cause arcing, and
that tends to foul them, get crap between the segments, etc. No big
deal to polish, but not fun either. This goes double if a bit of oil
that leaked from somewhere gets in there.
> They don't go overvoltage and fry your radios like an alternator can...
Not true. Your generator can indeed go overvoltage. All it takes is a
failure in the overvoltage cutout on the regulator, or a field short to
ground. If the latter, the field switch will not be able to take the
generator offline. In fact, NOTHING will take it offline short of
pulling the breaker.
On top of that, even pulling the breaker is not a solution when you're
dealing with paralelled generators (and you are). That paralelling
relay system was developed for tractors (so there would not be a need
to built a very few expensive custom oversize generators) not airplanes
(with redundancy in mind). The failure I described (field short to
ground) is one that will take down the entire systems (as the
paralelling relay attempts to balance loads) and really hurts the
redundancy aspects.
> Yes, they make less volts/current at
> idle and low rpm, but you don't have to have everything turned on until
> you roll onto the runway for take off...
Personally, I like to have all my avionics tunred on and set up when
launching into IMC, but that's just me.
In any case - I used to have all sorts of problems with my generator
system, to the point where I kept a spare generator on the shelf. Then
I replaced the 1930's-design vibrating point voltage regulators with a
Zeftronics set ($500 or so for the pair) and all the problems went
away, just like that. On top of that, the system is truly redundant
now - the regulators talk to each other and balance the laod based on
current, not voltage. If one is offline, it can't take down the other.
I suggest that as the real fix - I've had experience with the InterAv
conversion as well (friend had it on his PA-30) and was NOT impressed.
It too is a non-redundant system (master contactor failure takes down
the whole thing). The ideal soluteion would have been a truly
redundant alternator system. I understand Zeftronics was working on
that a couple of years ago - maybe they have it available now. I've
certainly been way more impressed by their stuff than anything InterAv
ever did.
Michael
Jim Burns
July 26th 05, 07:37 PM
>Then
> I replaced the 1930's-design vibrating point voltage regulators with a
> Zeftronics set ($500 or so for the pair) and all the problems went
> away, just like that. On top of that, the system is truly redundant
> now - the regulators talk to each other and balance the laod based on
> current, not voltage. If one is offline, it can't take down the other.
>
Michael,
Could you elaborate more on the Zeftronics system and it's components? I
believe that the regulators on our Aztec need adjustment as our left
alternator has a larger draw on it than the right. I've been told that
adjusting them isn't particularly fun and would be interested in the
Zeftronics system should we find adjusting the regulators does not solve our
output imbalance.
Thanks as always,
Jim Burns
Michael
July 27th 05, 12:03 AM
Jim Burns wrote:
> Could you elaborate more on the Zeftronics system and it's components? I
> believe that the regulators on our Aztec need adjustment as our left
> alternator has a larger draw on it than the right.
Unfortunately, I know nothing about their alternator system - only the
generator system.
> I've been told that
> adjusting them isn't particularly fun and would be interested in the
> Zeftronics system should we find adjusting the regulators does not solve our
> output imbalance.
I'm familiar with the process. I've never seen anyone get it right
except by luck. The mechanical regulators don't act the same with the
caps on as they do with the caps off.
Michael
Jim Burns
July 27th 05, 03:08 AM
Thanks.... I'll hunt them up at OSH tomorrow (hopefully)
Jim
"Michael" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Jim Burns wrote:
> > Could you elaborate more on the Zeftronics system and it's components?
I
> > believe that the regulators on our Aztec need adjustment as our left
> > alternator has a larger draw on it than the right.
>
> Unfortunately, I know nothing about their alternator system - only the
> generator system.
>
> > I've been told that
> > adjusting them isn't particularly fun and would be interested in the
> > Zeftronics system should we find adjusting the regulators does not solve
our
> > output imbalance.
>
> I'm familiar with the process. I've never seen anyone get it right
> except by luck. The mechanical regulators don't act the same with the
> caps on as they do with the caps off.
>
> Michael
>
Denny
July 27th 05, 12:29 PM
OK Dean, well that's just my opinion... Nothing wrong with either
alternators or gennies, just different methods to convert AC to DC....
Changing the system over to alternators is going to be expensive, and I
personally would do it only if the generators and regulators were
totally shot and needed to be replaced, then I would consider spending
the money for switching... I have to say that all the chargingn
failures I have had in flight over the past 4 decades have been the
alternators... I recognize that is just happenstance... But,
generators tend to give you lots of warning that they are hurting and I
have been lucky enough to recognize the cry for help before failure...
Not so with the alternator failures... Having said that, the RV7 I am
building will have dual alternators...
My suggestion is for you to spend the money for Bob Nucholl's book...
You will be a bunch more aware of the pitfalls of charging systems
after reading it (emminently readable and not loaded down with calculus
equations, etc)... He likes alternators, BTW...
Now, someone made a comment that one generator puts out more than the
other... Let me comment that for the generators to have automatic
selection, one has to have the regulator voltage set higher than the
other, otherwise the selector relay will `hunt'.... As a result of the
higher voltage set point that one will usually show more charging
current than the other when tested separately... I have found that
during local flights, turning off the gennie that always takes the load
(port engine on mine) and allowing the other to work, keeps the
starboard commutator healthy and ready to go if the port gennie does
shut down for real... Also, forget the current meter - it's close to
worthless... What you want is a voltage meter... On my plane the port
engine regulator is adjusted to 14.1 volts and the starboard to 13.8
volts... I don't have problems with the selector relay hunting and the
system works fine...
cheers ... denny
: shut down for real... Also, forget the current meter - it's close to
: worthless... What you want is a voltage meter... On my plane the port
: engine regulator is adjusted to 14.1 volts and the starboard to 13.8
: volts...
Not sure if you're talking of an ammeter or a loadmeter. What one really
needs to know the health of the system is *both* a voltmeter and loadmeter. If I
could only have one or the other, however, I'd agree that a voltmeter is more useful.
Anything under 13 and the alternator is maxing out (for a given RPM). Anything
under 12.5 and the battery is discharging. Anything over 14.4-ish and the battery is
boiling.
-Cory
--
************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************
David Lesher
July 27th 05, 07:33 PM
writes:
>: shut down for real... Also, forget the current meter - it's close to
>: worthless... What you want is a voltage meter... On my plane the port
>: engine regulator is adjusted to 14.1 volts and the starboard to 13.8
>: volts...
> Not sure if you're talking of an ammeter or a loadmeter. What one really
>needs to know the health of the system is *both* a voltmeter and loadmeter. If I
>could only have one or the other, however, I'd agree that a voltmeter is more useful.
>Anything under 13 and the alternator is maxing out (for a given RPM). Anything
>under 12.5 and the battery is discharging. Anything over 14.4-ish and the battery is
>boiling.
But with dual generators/alternators; voltmeters alone will do you
little good diagnosing problems. You will need an ammeter on each
source, and a bus voltmeter. Someone should make a panel display
with LED's for all three, and a small digital meter that will cycle
between them.
--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Denny
July 28th 05, 01:00 PM
Someone should make a panel display
with LED's for all three, and a small digital meter that will cycle
between them.
************************************************** ***************
Well, that would be a nice gadget, but I do take exception with the
need for an amp meter in flight... All the amp meter tells me is which
is higher in voltage, and therefore pushing the current at that
instant, the battery or the charger - it does not tell me what the
state of the charge is... The battery can be at 11.8 volts and the
alternator on it's last living diode at 12.0 volts, and you will not
show a big discharge on the amp meter, but you are in for deep doo doo,
very soon... Give me a good volt meter any day...
Luckily, aircraft share the 12 volts with autos, and any auto store
will have an expanded scale DC voltmeter that you can plug into the
cigarette lighter... Have one of those in the plane and you can
quickly verify that the alternator is doing the job or not... None of
this waiting for the amp meter to go into discharge to tell you are in
trouble - which is way too late - the volt meter will warn you of
impending problems long before the battery goes toes up...
I have used the voltage reading in the GPS295 as my generator testor
for years now... Unfortunately, Garmin did not include that feature on
the 296 on my yoke, and now on run up I have to lean over and look at
the copilot yoke to check the gennies... There I am, leaning way over
to the right, one hand down on the floor flipping generator switches,
one eye on the tach, one eye on the GPS295, and if my passenger is
young and female, my head between her boobs... Life is tough I gotta
tell ya...
cheers ... denny
David Lesher
July 28th 05, 09:32 PM
"Denny" > writes:
>Someone should make a panel display
>with LED's for all three, and a small digital meter that will cycle
>between them.
>************************************************** ***************
>Well, that would be a nice gadget, but I do take exception with the
>need for an amp meter in flight
But it WILL tell you that both {*}ators are working; not just one.
Or than one is doing 90% of the work, and the other 10%, etc.
(You can force the issue, to be sure. On the ramp; load the system
-- all lamps, electric heat props, whatever. Run up #1 and see what
happens. Throttle back and repeat w/#2. You don't need matched
regulators to see that both sides charge -- but in flight, I'd rather
have..
>alternator on it's last living diode at 12.0 volts, and you will not
>show a big discharge on the amp meter, but you are in for deep doo doo,
>very soon... Give me a good volt meter any day...
On a twin; I'd want two single-ended ammeters, one on each {*}ator.
Not the zero center kind that tells you NET gain/loss re: the battery.
Then a good voltmeter on the bus/battery.
As for bad diodes; I trust my ears. But ammeters will tell you.
>Luckily, aircraft share the 12 volts with autos, and any auto store
>will have an expanded scale DC voltmeter that you can plug into the
>cigarette lighter... Have one of those in the plane and you can
>quickly verify that the alternator is doing the job or not... None of
With this proviso... that kind of crap [engineering term of art] is
notoriously uncalibrated.
<http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/fs-1037/dir-001/_0125.htm> But so what?
You just want REPEATABILITY. Borrow a DVM and calibrate it with your
car, if nothing else. Mark the face at oh say 14v, 12v and maybe 15.
Then gather experience as you fly.
Note, BTW, that even a cheapo DVM typically offers good accuracy;
all the magic is the chipset and oscillator. Buy one.
>this waiting for the amp meter to go into discharge to tell you are in
>trouble - which is way too late - the volt meter will warn you of
>impending problems long before the battery goes toes up...
Maybe....BUT one side could be all but dead and the other
coping just fine...until...
--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
John Clonts
July 28th 05, 09:48 PM
> As for bad diodes; I trust my ears....
What do you mean by this? That you hear something distinctive when a
diode goes out? Do you hear it directly, or is it through your headset
or audio system? What does it sound like?
--
Thanks!
John Clonts
Temple, Texas
N7NZ
David Lesher
July 29th 05, 04:25 AM
"John Clonts" > writes:
>> As for bad diodes; I trust my ears....
>What do you mean by this? That you hear something distinctive when a
>diode goes out? Do you hear it directly, or is it through your headset
>or audio system? What does it sound like?
With all six diodes intact, the rectified DC from the 3-phase AC
waveform is reasonably low-ripple. Lose a diode and that takes a
chunk out. On a car, you can hear the whineeeeeee change pitch in
the radio, esp. AM, as you go through the gears.
See http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_3/4.html and look at
the "3-phase full wave bridge rectifier" and the waveform below. Now,
take away the blue and see what it looks like....
But as a pilot, you are far smarter than Fred Freeway. You can
usually tell a bad diode without listening, just by the ammeter
readings. Not directly, but rather from knowing your aircraft.
Make some tests: run landing lights before approach, and at X rpm,
you see Y amps. Make a note. And so forth...If one day, it makes
about 30% less current than it normally does, in similar circumstances
[i.e. climb-out from your home field, at X rpm, for n minutes..];
be suspicious....
One confort: You'd think that losing one diode would increase the
strain on the other 2 and THEY'd soon fail as well. But I've seen
'whiners' that lasted for months. I guess the diodes are usually
NOT the weakest link; the ones that fail are not from overheating
but other causes [bad bonds, vibration, etc.]
--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Denny
July 29th 05, 12:56 PM
Just a final comment to repeat my recommendation that every airplane
owner have a copy of Robert Nuckolls book THE AERO ELECTRIC CONNECTION
($33 and worth ten times that in what it will save you in mechanics
fees by identifying problems before they are problems)
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Catalog/AECcatalog.html
and scroll down...
It is aimed at the homebuilders, but tons of information any airplane
owner can use...
Denny
73 de k8do
AztecN867DC
October 6th 05, 04:30 PM
Have had a 1960 PA23-250 for almost 10 years now, love it. Two years
ago switched from the generators to the InterAv alternator kit. Feel
it was the right decision and am pleased with the results.
Reasons for switch:
1) Generators do NOT put out any charging current below a certain RPM,
in our case it took 1700 RPM to get any appreciable output, they were
calling us the AzJet because we were blowing over the 172s behind us in
order to keep the battery up.
2) My partner called me several times to come jump start the plane, he
would forget to turn off all unneeded lights and radios while taxiing
back and the battery would run down.
3) Went through the trouble about 5 years ago to get the generators
overhauled, new regulators and balancing relay, still had balance and
charging problems.
After the conversion:
1) alternators put out good current at idle, radios operate just fine
with engines idling.
2) End of dead battery problems, no more dead battery when opening up
the plane.
3) I can taxi around without blowing the 172s all over the place.
4) So far (find some wood) have not had a balancing or charging
problem.
5) Generator whine (feedback through intercom) is gone, radio sound is
noticeably cleaner.
Notes to pay attention to:
1) make sure the black ring (the diode holder) on the back of the
alternator does not contact anything, has plenty of clearance around
it, else it grounds out through the diode holder and will burn out the
alternator.
2) Use the old regulator mount on the aft side of the firewall to mount
the new regulator assembly to, stays cooler and cleaner, much neater
wiring installation.
3) Absolutely replace the output wires with a #4 guage wire up to the
fuselage juction block.
4) Use a #4 guage wire to fabricate the ground bonding wire, make
absolutely sure the bonding straps on each side of the engine case to
the engine mounts are clean and in good condition.
5) Add an additional ground wire from the regulator to the alternator
(solved a balance problem).
6) weigh and track all parts coming off and going on, including wires
pulled and installed for form 337 weight and balance changes. (Hint:
weigh the wire spool before and after you run it, in order to get
accurate weight of what was installed.)
I am an A&P in the D.C area, my I.A. and Balto FSDO were watching
over my shoulders, the more meticulous I was, the happier FSDO got, and
signed off the 337 on the spot.
Good Luck
--
AztecN867DC
Powered by www.flight.org
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.