![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just noticed this today:
AIM 5-2-2. Taxi Clearance Pilots on IFR flight plans should communicate with the control tower on the appropriate ground control or clearance delivery frequency, prior to starting engines, to receive engine start time, taxi and/or clearance information. --------------------------------- In the Azores, Portugal, when I checked out at a local flying club, it was mandatory to contact the control tower prior to engine start, even when flying VFR. (And it was mandatory to receive a clearance to "start engines" before doing so). However, in the US, I was not taught, nor have I ever called in "prior to starting engines" unless that requirement was explicitly stated on the ATIS (as it has been occasionally at KBOS). Is this a holdover from former times? Or something else altogether? Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think this is aimed at the turbine crowd, not the piston pilots, although
the AIM does not make any distinction. Bob Gardner "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... I just noticed this today: AIM 5-2-2. Taxi Clearance Pilots on IFR flight plans should communicate with the control tower on the appropriate ground control or clearance delivery frequency, prior to starting engines, to receive engine start time, taxi and/or clearance information. --------------------------------- In the Azores, Portugal, when I checked out at a local flying club, it was mandatory to contact the control tower prior to engine start, even when flying VFR. (And it was mandatory to receive a clearance to "start engines" before doing so). However, in the US, I was not taught, nor have I ever called in "prior to starting engines" unless that requirement was explicitly stated on the ATIS (as it has been occasionally at KBOS). Is this a holdover from former times? Or something else altogether? Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Europe start up permission is always mandatory at controlled airfields.
Not just for turbines, also for piston... "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... I think this is aimed at the turbine crowd, not the piston pilots, although the AIM does not make any distinction. Bob Gardner "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... I just noticed this today: AIM 5-2-2. Taxi Clearance Pilots on IFR flight plans should communicate with the control tower on the appropriate ground control or clearance delivery frequency, prior to starting engines, to receive engine start time, taxi and/or clearance information. --------------------------------- In the Azores, Portugal, when I checked out at a local flying club, it was mandatory to contact the control tower prior to engine start, even when flying VFR. (And it was mandatory to receive a clearance to "start engines" before doing so). However, in the US, I was not taught, nor have I ever called in "prior to starting engines" unless that requirement was explicitly stated on the ATIS (as it has been occasionally at KBOS). Is this a holdover from former times? Or something else altogether? Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "TMG" wrote in message . .. In Europe start up permission is always mandatory at controlled airfields. Not just for turbines, also for piston... What's the reasoning behind that, if any? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() TMG wrote: In Europe start up permission is always mandatory at controlled airfields. Not just for turbines, also for piston... Poor souls. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was learning to fly at the Ramstein Aero Club, at Ramstein AB, West
Germany when this policy was started, sometime between 1984 and 1986. I don't know for certain why they started making everyone from our F-4E Phantom pilots on down to student pilots in Piper Tomahawks request permission to start engines from the tower, but I'd heard it was intended as a security measure to help prevent terrorists from attempting to steal an aircraft. That would be Red Army Faction, not Al Queda, way back then. I'd also thought back then that it was just a local policy at Ramstein, or perhaps throughout USAFE, but from the orginal posting in this thread I see that it was impemented all over Europe. Scott Wilson On 24-Sep-2005, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: In Europe start up permission is always mandatory at controlled airfields. Not just for turbines, also for piston... What's the reasoning behind that, if any? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm based in California, but I've flown from controlled fields in both
Ireland (EIWF) and Sweden (ESSB) and I never had to get an engine start clearance. So I'm not so sure that this is a pan European thing. -Brenor |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Europe uses a system of airport and airway slots to avoid delays. If your airway or airport slot has expired, a new one must be renegotiated. Once you taxi in Europe, you takeoff as soon as you get to the runway. So to avoid delays at the end of the runway, one must call pre-start for clearance and to permit ATC coordination. Lynne Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "TMG" wrote in message . .. In Europe start up permission is always mandatory at controlled airfields. Not just for turbines, also for piston... What's the reasoning behind that, if any? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "TMG" wrote in message . .. In Europe start up permission is always mandatory at controlled airfields. Not just for turbines, also for piston... What's the reasoning behind that, if any? They seem to have a rigid system of airways between city pairs so ground holds are fairly common. Mike MU-2 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I always call on the handheld to get my clearance prior to engine start.
That way, if there is a delay, I am not paying to keep the engine running while I wait. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Touch and Goes versus Full Stop Taxi Backs | Kevin Dunlevy | Piloting | 81 | September 18th 05 09:26 PM |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |