![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know I should know this, but I just can't remember. If I lose comm on an
assigned arrival do I step down to the altitudes on the arrival segments? If it visual can I "assign myself" the visual approach? Thanks, Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most, if not all, stepdowns are based on terrain/obstacle clearance, so it
would make sense to follow the procedure. If you break out into VFR, just use your PIC authority to do whatever you think best. Bob Gardner "Michael 182" wrote in message news:xoTUa.159230$N7.21008@sccrnsc03... I know I should know this, but I just can't remember. If I lose comm on an assigned arrival do I step down to the altitudes on the arrival segments? If it visual can I "assign myself" the visual approach? Thanks, Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Gardner wrote:
Most, if not all, stepdowns are based on terrain/obstacle clearance, so it would make sense to follow the procedure. If you break out into VFR, just use your PIC authority to do whatever you think best. Bob, Respectfully, if the pilot breaks out into 'VFR', isn't he bound by 91.185(b) to "land as soon as practicable"? Clearly there is some PIC authority involved in deciding what is "practicable". My point is, I don't think we should forget ths part of the reg; if the pilot breaks into VMC, but continues a protracted IFR arrival procedure and a visual approach into a busy airport whilst overflying several airports of suitable landing length, it is possible he might have some explaining to do. Cheers, Sydney |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're right....I took that as a given.
Bob Gardner "Sydney Hoeltzli" wrote in message ... Bob Gardner wrote: Most, if not all, stepdowns are based on terrain/obstacle clearance, so it would make sense to follow the procedure. If you break out into VFR, just use your PIC authority to do whatever you think best. Bob, Respectfully, if the pilot breaks out into 'VFR', isn't he bound by 91.185(b) to "land as soon as practicable"? Clearly there is some PIC authority involved in deciding what is "practicable". My point is, I don't think we should forget ths part of the reg; if the pilot breaks into VMC, but continues a protracted IFR arrival procedure and a visual approach into a busy airport whilst overflying several airports of suitable landing length, it is possible he might have some explaining to do. Cheers, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how much money have you lost on the lottery? NOW GET THAT MONEY BACK! | shane | Home Built | 0 | February 5th 05 07:54 AM |
RST Engineering Comm attenna | Mike Scovel | Home Built | 3 | December 30th 04 05:30 PM |
Retractable Comm Antenna | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 11 | September 6th 04 06:59 PM |
I'm lost. Which compass? | Greg Burkhart | Home Built | 1 | August 12th 03 03:49 AM |
Hughes Racer Replica Lost | Wayne Sagar | Home Built | 9 | August 10th 03 01:45 PM |