Is 91.175 enforced in the USA?

Peter wrote:
This is the reg which prevents flying instrument approaches unless it
is a published one.

In the UK, this is not illegal (on G-reg aircraft). But then we don't
get the radar services here, etc. Pilots tend to fly descents using a
GPS, etc.

In the USA, there are GPS approaches, and there are many more
instrument approaches anyway.

At the *practical* level, I am curious to what extent the FAA enforces
this regulation. I suppose this question is relevant only in the
context of airports which don't have a published IAP - I don't know
what % this is in the USA.

I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.

-Robert, CFII

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...

I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.


That's all Capt. Jeppesen had.

"Robert M. Gary" wrote
I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.

I don't know why...I've flown homemade approaches all over the third
world using equipment far less accurate than GPS(Omega and INS) in big
jets. Sure as hell beat some of their ADFs in a thunderstorm.

Bob Moore

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert M. Gary ]
Posted At: Thursday, December 21, 2006 4:23 PM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: Is 91.175 enforced in the USA?
Subject: Is 91.175 enforced in the USA?


....

I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.

-Robert, CFII

Having never been forced into that corner -- before GPS came on the
scene -- I have to admit I once felt the same way Bob. After having been
there -- again before GPS came of age -- I have to agree with Bob Moore.
Homemade approaches can sometimes save your butt, but they can also get
you hurt.

I'm not advocating a non-pub'd approach by any means, but then I don't
advocate that people collect on their life insurance policies either.

I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.

Why?

Jose
--
"There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows
what they are." - (mike).
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Stan Prevost wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...

I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.



That's all Capt. Jeppesen had.



Naw, he had two GPSes. ;-)

"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...
Stan Prevost wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...

I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.



That's all Capt. Jeppesen had.



Naw, he had two GPSes. ;-)

With moving map, I'm sure!

Stan Prevost wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...
I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.


That's all Capt. Jeppesen had.


Darn, he was way ahead of his time.

Bob Moore wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.

I don't know why...I've flown homemade approaches all over the third
world using equipment far less accurate than GPS(Omega and INS) in big
jets. Sure as hell beat some of their ADFs in a thunderstorm.

I guess it depends on the situation. I've certainly done a few homemade
approaches in Mexico. However, that is in class G IFR where I don't
have to worry about running into someone's airspace. Baja is very easy
because you just put yourself off the coast, descend over the ocean
(which is pretty flat) and turn inbound.

-Robert

Bob Moore wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
I have a hard time imaging a pilot would want to fly a homemade GPS
approach.

I don't know why...I've flown homemade approaches all over the third
world using equipment far less accurate than GPS(Omega and INS) in big
jets. Sure as hell beat some of their ADFs in a thunderstorm.

BTW: Even in controlled airspace, Mexican controllers will not issue an
IFR clearance w/o asking you if you are instrument rated. Not sure what
purpose that serves though. I've gotten many IFR enroutes from Tijuana
control.

-Robert