![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
§ 91.175 Takeoff and landing under IFR.
(a) Instrument approaches to civil airports. Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, when an instrument letdown to a civil airport is necessary, each person operating an aircraft, except a military aircraft of the United States, shall use a standard instrument approach procedure prescribed for the airport in part 97 of this chapter. Yes it is enforced, but note that "unless authorized by the Administrator" which means that private approaches can be created, flight tested and approved for use. A private airport can have an IAP approved for use only by authorized pilots. It has to meet approval standards and be flight tested at your expense. "Peter" wrote in message ... | This is the reg which prevents flying instrument approaches unless it | is a published one. | | In the UK, this is not illegal (on G-reg aircraft). But then we don't | get the radar services here, etc. Pilots tend to fly descents using a | GPS, etc. | | In the USA, there are GPS approaches, and there are many more | instrument approaches anyway. | | At the *practical* level, I am curious to what extent the FAA enforces | this regulation. I suppose this question is relevant only in the | context of airports which don't have a published IAP - I don't know | what % this is in the USA. | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|