![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Silver distance rules
In the recent past, a pilot could declare a remote start point some distance from the launch / release point. Then soar to the declared start point and cross a start line to begin the task. One example of this task would allow a glider pilot to release near the home gliderport, fly some distance (25 km) to the start line, then retrace the route back to the gliderport - overfly the gliderport and continue to a finish line 25 kilometers away before returning to the gliderport. The pilot would have soared some 100 km to achieve the declared 50 km task to fulfill the Silver badge distance requirement, however, never being more than 25 km away. This task required planning and soaring / navigating and judgment skills, but with reasonable judgment, avoided the risks associated with off field landings. The only thing the new FAI rules will create is the necessity for the tow plane to tow the glider some 25 kilometers to the release point incurring more expense and a higher risk of an off field landing. One of the principle purposes of the Silver Badge is to encourage pilots to discover the satisfaction of achieving goals. The new rules imposes unnecessary higher risks. Tom Knauff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 7:26:06 AM UTC-5, wrote:
Silver distance rules In the recent past, a pilot could declare a remote start point some distance from the launch / release point. Then soar to the declared start point and cross a start line to begin the task. One example of this task would allow a glider pilot to release near the home gliderport, fly some distance (25 km) to the start line, then retrace the route back to the gliderport - overfly the gliderport and continue to a finish line 25 kilometers away before returning to the gliderport. The pilot would have soared some 100 km to achieve the declared 50 km task to fulfill the Silver badge distance requirement, however, never being more than 25 km away. This task required planning and soaring / navigating and judgment skills, but with reasonable judgment, avoided the risks associated with off field landings. The only thing the new FAI rules will create is the necessity for the tow plane to tow the glider some 25 kilometers to the release point incurring more expense and a higher risk of an off field landing. One of the principle purposes of the Silver Badge is to encourage pilots to discover the satisfaction of achieving goals. The new rules imposes unnecessary higher risks. Tom Knauff staying within 25 km of the home field is a local flight for any modern glider. silver distance is supposed to be about flying cross country. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I achieved Silver Distance on the second leg of a triangle flown during
one of the TSA Labor Day contests. I'm with FAI on this. Let's not make it so easy that anyone can do it without any sort of risk. Part of the accomplishment is the planning and execution according to the same rules that our predecessors followed and in much less capable ships. If they could do it, why not us? A flight accomplished on the first try may really "wow" the current generation but it just makes me yawn. My badges don't impress me as much as, say, Steve DuPont's but I think they're a lot more impressive than those flown under today's rules, with today's instruments, and in today's gliders. On 10/13/2015 8:02 AM, Tony wrote: On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 7:26:06 AM UTC-5, wrote: Silver distance rules In the recent past, a pilot could declare a remote start point some distance from the launch / release point. Then soar to the declared start point and cross a start line to begin the task. One example of this task would allow a glider pilot to release near the home gliderport, fly some distance (25 km) to the start line, then retrace the route back to the gliderport - overfly the gliderport and continue to a finish line 25 kilometers away before returning to the gliderport. The pilot would have soared some 100 km to achieve the declared 50 km task to fulfill the Silver badge distance requirement, however, never being more than 25 km away. This task required planning and soaring / navigating and judgment skills, but with reasonable judgment, avoided the risks associated with off field landings. The only thing the new FAI rules will create is the necessity for the tow plane to tow the glider some 25 kilometers to the release point incurring more expense and a higher risk of an off field landing. One of the principle purposes of the Silver Badge is to encourage pilots to discover the satisfaction of achieving goals. The new rules imposes unnecessary higher risks. Tom Knauff staying within 25 km of the home field is a local flight for any modern glider. silver distance is supposed to be about flying cross country. -- Dan, 5J |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly as Tony said.
A flight where you stay wishin glide of the airport is not a cross country flight, it is a local flight. Another way to look at it: a flight without any risk of landout is not a true cross country flight, regardless of distance. In some places you can easily score 500km OLC flight by climbing to 18K and yoyo around the airport without ever getting out of glide. This is still a local flight, not a cross country flight... Ramy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 10:03:01 AM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 7:26:06 AM UTC-5, wrote: Silver distance rules In the recent past, a pilot could declare a remote start point some distance from the launch / release point. Then soar to the declared start point and cross a start line to begin the task. One example of this task would allow a glider pilot to release near the home gliderport, fly some distance (25 km) to the start line, then retrace the route back to the gliderport - overfly the gliderport and continue to a finish line 25 kilometers away before returning to the gliderport. The pilot would have soared some 100 km to achieve the declared 50 km task to fulfill the Silver badge distance requirement, however, never being more than 25 km away. This task required planning and soaring / navigating and judgment skills, but with reasonable judgment, avoided the risks associated with off field landings. The only thing the new FAI rules will create is the necessity for the tow plane to tow the glider some 25 kilometers to the release point incurring more expense and a higher risk of an off field landing. One of the principle purposes of the Silver Badge is to encourage pilots to discover the satisfaction of achieving goals. The new rules imposes unnecessary higher risks. Tom Knauff staying within 25 km of the home field is a local flight for any modern glider. silver distance is supposed to be about flying cross country. We have sort of a local rule. Do a 50 k in a 1-26 any way you want. Most go straight out to Blairstown 45 miles away. If you have a glass ship, we expect more. Many have done it with a 140k triangle using the first turn as a remote start and the last turn as remote finish. When you do this on a 4000 foot day, common to us, it is a real cross country. Now the IGC has basically said that you have to commit to a landing away for Silver distance I think it is a poor decision, like Tom. UH |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:56:11 -0700, unclhank wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 10:03:01 AM UTC-4, Tony wrote: On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 7:26:06 AM UTC-5, wrote: Silver distance rules In the recent past, a pilot could declare a remote start point some distance from the launch / release point. Then soar to the declared start point and cross a start line to begin the task. One example of this task would allow a glider pilot to release near the home gliderport, fly some distance (25 km) to the start line, then retrace the route back to the gliderport - overfly the gliderport and continue to a finish line 25 kilometers away before returning to the gliderport. When I did mine (2001, SZD Junior, off the winch) the usual briefing was to fly to another glider field and land there. The reasoning is that landing on an airfield you've never seen before is useful XC training and I can't argue with that. Depending on wind direction our usual targets are Rattlesden (68km east) or Husbands Bosworth, (70 km west). Derigging and trailering the Junior home is also good experience for both pilot and crew, since very few of us have much rigging experience before we fly the Silver distance: bear in mind that this is almost always done in a club glider and that these are kept fully rigged in our hangar. The only difference these days is that people tend to use something with a bit more performance (Pegase, Discus, ASW24) for their Silver distance and to do it as an out and return to much the same remote fields. Some also do their C distance as one leg of a larger triangle if they're flying one of these gliders. I can't remember anybody using a remote start to stay within 25-30 km of home. We have sort of a local rule. Do a 50 k in a 1-26 any way you want. Most go straight out to Blairstown 45 miles away. If you have a glass ship, we expect more. Many have done it with a 140k triangle using the first turn as a remote start and the last turn as remote finish. When you do this on a 4000 foot day, common to us, it is a real cross country. Good one! That sounds like a proper C distance, and a most suitable glider to do it in. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 8:56:29 AM UTC-7, wrote:
Now the IGC has basically said that you have to commit to a landing away for Silver distance I think it is a poor decision, like Tom. No. The pilot may do a 100k+ O&R. There is no requirement to make a physical landing at the destination. A turn point just needs to be at least 50 km from the release point. But if the pilot can climb and stay above 2000M, then for a 40:1 sailplane it's definitely a local flight. This new rule only handicaps a few locations that may have low thermals and airspace / terrain that precludes safely going more than 25-30km from home... 5Z |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le mardi 13 octobre 2015 14:26:06 UTC+2, a écrit*:
Silver distance rules The only thing the new FAI rules will create is the necessity for the tow plane to tow the glider some 25 kilometers to the release point incurring more expense and a higher risk of an off field landing. Tom Knauff If they really wanted to force one to leave the vicinity of the home airfield, they should indeed have phrased it "50 km from the airfield of departure" instead of "from the release point"... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 6:00:06 AM UTC-4, Tim Newport-Peace wrote:
At 08:50 14 October 2015, wrote: Le mardi 13 octobre 2015 14:26:06 UTC+2, a =E9crit=A0: Silver distance rules =20 The only thing the new FAI rules will create is the necessity for the tow= plane to tow the glider some 25 kilometers to the release point incurring= more expense and a higher risk of an off field landing. =20 Tom Knauff If they really wanted to force one to leave the vicinity of the home airfie= ld, they should indeed have phrased it "50 km from the airfield of departur= e" instead of "from the release point"... The "Soaring Performance" begins at the Release Point, not the Home Airfield. So which is the better performance?: Tow to the start(release) point. Or soar to the start point. UH |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sporting Code Question | Peter von Tresckow | Soaring | 4 | June 27th 12 07:08 PM |
Sporting Code Question | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 6 | March 24th 08 06:46 PM |
Why does the Sporting code require "Goal" to be a finish point??? | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 31 | October 18th 04 10:31 PM |
Why does the Sporting code require | stephanevdv | Soaring | 2 | October 17th 04 06:38 PM |
FAI Sporting Code Section 3 experts wanted | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 28 | September 1st 04 05:58 PM |