Awaiting Natalie's "interpretation of what he meant

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Gig Giacona" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

So, Ron, wht did you mean by this post, other than what it clearly
says?

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


No, homebuilts are type certificated under Part 21 as
Experimental.

No John, they are not. They do not have type certificates. What
they
have are individual airworthiness certificates issued under
21.191.There
is no type certification of experimentals.

You had best get with the "experimental aircraft association" on that
one,
Ron.


With the exception of paragraph (b) which has nothing to do with
amateur-built aircraft where the hell is the word TYPE anywhere in
21.191?

Non-sequitur.


JTarver

You are without a doubt the most obnoxious poster in the rec.aviation.*
groups. I that is saying something.

You keep telling Ron that amateur-built aircraft have a type certificate.
Yet NO where in the FAR are the words "amateur-built" and "type" ever in the
same paragraph. What the regs clearly show is that amateur-built aircraft
are flown under an experimental AIRWORTHINESS certificate.

To when your side of the argument all you have to do is cut and paste the
damn reg you think you are quoting.