![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know why the Mansfield OH MFD ILS RWY 32 approach plate has ADF
or Radar Required written on it? There is speculation on another forum that ADF is required to establish the FAF for the localizer approach, but I argued that it is not required for the ILS approach, since intercept of the glideslope is the "FAF" for the ILS approach. The approaches we have in FL are similar but do not have ADF or Radar Required written on them. I can understand that without radar vectors, setting up for the ILS approach would require ADF so that one overflies the NDB outbound, stays within ten miles, and then comes back to intercept the glideslope; therefore, radar vectors or ADF would be required for this approach. But this is obvious on other approach plates without spelling it out. Why is this verbiage written on this approach plate? Thanks. Simon Ramirez |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Victor Airways on Approach Control Radar? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | February 26th 04 02:23 PM |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
Ham sandwich navigation and radar failure | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | December 31st 03 12:15 AM |
Marine Radar in a plane? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 31 | August 13th 03 06:56 PM |
Why is ADF required on ILS approach? | Rich Raine | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | August 1st 03 05:14 PM |