|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#16
August 26th 04, 01:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:36:41 -0500, J Haggerty
wrote: then it would be up to ATC to indicate that the course reversal was not necessary by stating that to the pilot. By what authority can ATC do this, on this particular approach? Chip has already indicated that ATC could not issue vectors to final for this approach; and I am not aware of any authority given ATC to modify published SIAP's by eliminating required course reversals, absent VTF or timed approaches. --ron 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| where to ask question about approach? | J Haggerty | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 17th 04 07:30 AM |
| Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 05:03 PM |
| Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 05:19 AM |
| Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 12:13 PM |
| Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 05:36 PM |
Threaded Mode